Mafiascum.net

In post 553, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 552, Dunnstral wrote:UNVOTE:

What is this?

In post 554, VFP wrote:If Dragons ever flips red, we should suspect Dunn for taking pressure of his buddy!

In post 555, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Dunn wasn't voting RLotus, RLotus is still L-1... But I think Dunn forgot who he was voting for which is concerning.

In post 556, VFP wrote:Thats why I say if Dragons flips red.
Also, I feel like Scum Dunn says a word or 2 if the unvote was from a Lotus mindset.

There's a votecount right above my post

In post 622, Andresvmb wrote:What I call “Executions for information” type arguments are so common around here for some reason.

I don't like these arguments but from experience it's a pretty even spread of town giving bad reasoning/scum giving excuses to eliminate

Ask them what information you'll be getting before or after the elimination and they almost never can bring forth anything comprehensible

In post 626, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 622, Andresvmb wrote:What I call “Executions for information” type arguments are so common around here for some reason.

I don't like these arguments but from experience it's a pretty even spread of town giving bad reasoning/scum giving excuses to eliminate

Ask them what information you'll be getting before or after the elimination and they almost never can bring forth anything comprehensible

Really? Oy. So far, I’ve mostly seen Scum do it. But you’re right, Town do it too. If I’m not wrong, Gamma fell prey to this exact same argument literally the last finished game we had hahaha so fair enough.

From the way that people are talking about my Kyouko read is very clear that no one in the thread except Kyouko read posts 247 - 259



But I have also completely surrendered on this push. Currently sheeping instead.

In post 627, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 626, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 622, Andresvmb wrote:What I call “Executions for information” type arguments are so common around here for some reason.

I don't like these arguments but from experience it's a pretty even spread of town giving bad reasoning/scum giving excuses to eliminate

Ask them what information you'll be getting before or after the elimination and they almost never can bring forth anything comprehensible

Really? Oy. So far, I’ve mostly seen Scum do it. But you’re right, Town do it too. If I’m not wrong, Gamma fell prey to this exact same argument literally the last finished game we had hahaha so fair enough.

Actually I went back, and no it wasn’t Gamma at all. But one interesting thing I did end up doing is reading most of their ISO in a different game we played together. There was a lot of fire behind Gamma’s posts, and a lot of excellent points. Let me re-read them here, see how I feel.

Hi Andre

In post 618, RLotus wrote:

In post 580, Noraa wrote:UNVOTE:
Lotus please claim. I don't want a lolhammer and that's the only reason I'm unvoting

In post 603, Noraa wrote:I want a claim from lotus but unless he claims pr, he's dying today

In post 611, Noraa wrote:Gamma, Lotus, and Andres are going to need prods soon

I thought you said you

don't

want to be the town leader

its the end of the day. we need to come to a consensus...
please claim. ur the largest wagon rn and for very valid reasons. You make it sound like there are no reasons to SR you when the content you've been providing looks big but is actually nothing. Your tone this game has been extremely deflated and I think there are a lot of very valid reasons to be voting you here. Like the only reason I can think of is if ur a pr but even if that's the case, so? Ur run up. We have less than 24 hours. You should claim. Isn't that how this works?

VOTE: Rlotus

I think Gamma is Town. I see some of that some style posting I’ve seen before, some contrasting to play they’ve observed in the past, and some good observations. Don’t SR it at present.

In post 630, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hi Andre

You don’t have any thoughts on my vote on you? Just saying hi? Haha

In post 632, Andresvmb wrote:I think Gamma is Town. I see some of that some style posting I’ve seen before, some contrasting to play they’ve observed in the past, and some good observations. Don’t SR it at present.

What does this even mean

That's E-1 again and VFP still has intent to hammer I believe

In post 60, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 39, Noraa wrote:How interesting. UC voyager reminds me of unwnd and he's posted what like 3 posts?

I haven’t played with UCV in quite a while but he never struck me as the incisive mind type

This for example. Bringing up your prior experience with a player to form a read I thought was Town positive. I saw you do the same thing here: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12484340.

Lotus, claim. we don't have the time for this. Claim and I'll unvote so we can get some discussion in to either start a new wagon or get the most out of your flip.

Ah Andre unvoted nm, E-2

also I've come to a conclusion. I believe Dunn is town. 99% accuracy

In post 140, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 135, Noraa wrote:at least I have never met someone who could trick me once I got their meta nailed down >.<

Not to be rude, but I do feel like you've at least had false starts in this regard, times you thought you had it figured out but found your body of work to be off. As such, I'd like some examples of who you've managed to figure out over time.

Same here. And I have seen the same thing your pointing too. So I thought this was a good observation. And asking for someone to refine a view point I thought was Town positive.

^you’re* pointing to*.

I don’t know my summary came all convoluted but I wanted to make the point that you’ve given me good vibes. I guess you could summarize it that way.

^@Gamma

@Dunn, I believe you have a vote in RVS, an Unvote, some consensus reads, and not much else. Is there anyone you would like to push right now?

In post 633, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 630, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Hi Andre

You don’t have any thoughts on my vote on you? Just saying hi? Haha

Is boring. You're probably not scum with Lotus. If Lotus flips town I'll reevaluate

In post 637, Noraa wrote:Lotus, claim. we don't have the time for this. Claim and I'll unvote so we can get some discussion in to either start a new wagon or get the most out of your flip.

Bargaining to get me to claim like that is hella weird

And please enlighten me on the valid reasons I am scum read

RLotus wrote:

In post 637, Noraa wrote:Lotus, claim. we don't have the time for this. Claim and I'll unvote so we can get some discussion in to either start a new wagon or get the most out of your flip.

Bargaining to get me to claim like that is hella weird

It really is. I keep reading it like what

I don't think its weird. we need a claim. we have less than a day. no shit we need a claim!!