Page 26 of 57
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:29 am
by SirCakez
In post 620, Shrek wrote: In post 619, Wisdom wrote:I wouldnt say your case makes him lockscum
Scummy, for sure
i mean refusing to give an actual reads list despite having supposedly caught up with everything is pretty scummy for me. maybe not 100% guaranteed scum but definitely enough for me to stake something on it
This game has been going for like two days why should I have to have a full readslist
This is stupid
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:30 am
by Not_Mafia
^ Scum caught for wrong reasons
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:31 am
by Wisdom
You don't need to have an elaborate full readlist, but placing people in tiers even if it is based on your gut can't be that hard.
@cakez
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:37 am
by Alchemist21
The pile on on Cakez is actually disgusting.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:37 am
by Wisdom
You townread him, Alch?
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:40 am
by Shrek
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:43 am
by Alchemist21
Yes, but besides that people are holding him to standards I haven’t seen anyone held to in years. “OMG NO FULL READSLIST IS SCUMMY” in 2 rl days is nothing, and
626 from Not Mafia is just a shitty jump-on.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:44 am
by Alchemist21
I’m not talking about the votes but the actual posts.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:45 am
by Shrek
In post 631, Alchemist21 wrote:Yes, but besides that people are holding him to standards I haven’t seen anyone held to in years. “OMG NO FULL READSLIST IS SCUMMY” in 2 rl days is nothing, and
626 from Not Mafia is just a shitty jump-on.
there are 25 pages and everyone has sufficiently contributed. i feel like thats enough to be able to gut read assuming hes caught up with everything
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:46 am
by Wisdom
Alchemist21 wrote:Yes, but besides that people are holding him to standards I haven’t seen anyone held to in years. “OMG NO FULL READSLIST IS SCUMMY” in 2 rl days is nothing, and
626 from Not Mafia is just a shitty jump-on.
As I said, he was not asked to provide a full elaborate list, just commit to some reads and share them
I'm sure you've played with n_m before...
I don't know why you're defending Cakez here
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:47 am
by Little Green Wheels
In post 625, SirCakez wrote: In post 620, Shrek wrote: In post 619, Wisdom wrote:I wouldnt say your case makes him lockscum
Scummy, for sure
i mean refusing to give an actual reads list despite having supposedly caught up with everything is pretty scummy for me. maybe not 100% guaranteed scum but definitely enough for me to stake something on it
This game has been going for like two days why should I have to have a full readslist
This is stupid
You shouldn't and you're right.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:48 am
by Wisdom
I mean, even if you disagree with the case, I don't get why you're against pressure on Cakez (which would help you read them better) unless you have a townread on them.
(still @alch)
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:49 am
by Alchemist21
In post 634, Wisdom wrote:Alchemist21 wrote:Yes, but besides that people are holding him to standards I haven’t seen anyone held to in years. “OMG NO FULL READSLIST IS SCUMMY” in 2 rl days is nothing, and
626 from Not Mafia is just a shitty jump-on.
As I said, he was not asked to provide a full elaborate list, just commit to some reads and share them
I'm sure you've played with n_m before...
I don't know why you're defending Cakez here
The fact that I played with NM before and know he does this shit is the only reason I didn’t vote him.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:49 am
by Wisdom
And there's LGW parroting Alch's defense
Don't you have bigger problems than that, LGW? You're effectively at E-1
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:50 am
by Alchemist21
I just told you I do, and this stupid pile on isn’t going to do anything to produce AI content, it’s just going to frustrate him.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:52 am
by Little Green Wheels
In post 627, Wisdom wrote:You don't need to have an elaborate full readlist, but placing people in tiers even if it is based on your gut can't be that hard.
@cakez
There's no reason for everyone to have to have a gut read on all the entire plist rn. I'm going to let this play out, but this is a dumb push when cakez has said they don't have what you're asking for.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:53 am
by Wisdom
Alchemist21 wrote:
I just told you I do, and this stupid pile on isn’t going to do anything to produce AI content, it’s just going to frustrate him.
Right.
How about the pile that actually matters? Do you like the reasons people have given for being on LGW?
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:53 am
by Shrek
@wisdom should we just get a flip here or what? ill defer to what you say
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:54 am
by Little Green Wheels
In post 638, Wisdom wrote:And there's LGW parroting Alch's defense
Don't you have bigger problems than that, LGW? You're effectively at E-1
I don't give a shit, when I see a bad push I'm going to call it out.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:55 am
by Little Green Wheels
In post 642, Shrek wrote:@wisdom should we just get a flip here or what? ill defer to what you say
Look at you.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:55 am
by Wisdom
In post 643, Little Green Wheels wrote: In post 638, Wisdom wrote:And there's LGW parroting Alch's defense
Don't you have bigger problems than that, LGW? You're effectively at E-1
I don't give a shit, when I see a bad push I'm going to call it out.
Is it a scummy push or just bad?
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:55 am
by Shrek
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:57 am
by Alchemist21
In post 641, Wisdom wrote:Alchemist21 wrote:
I just told you I do, and this stupid pile on isn’t going to do anything to produce AI content, it’s just going to frustrate him.
Right.
How about the pile that actually matters? Do you like the reasons people have given for being on LGW?
I didn’t even realize LGW had so many votes until you said something. Before people tried to tie LGW and Cakez I don’t remember any reason for LGW scum other than bad vibes.
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:57 am
by Shrek
this is scumteam scrambling
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 7:58 am
by Little Green Wheels
You wanna define your premise?
