Page 26 of 111

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:02 am
by Save The Dragons
In post 585, Save The Dragons wrote:hate 312 just seems like fluff
comes off as forced. being null on mom isn't controversial, and while being pro RR might be, i really dislike the DOTW vote justification (floating) when see .

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:41 am
by Radical Rat
VOTE: Aristophanes

I have no objections here, and deadline anxiety

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:46 am
by Gamma Emerald
VOTE: aristophanes
I don't feel too great about this but I'm not confidently TRing Ari at all

also unless dwlee wants to step off for it meg has to be hammer

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:47 am
by Dwlee99
UNVOTE:

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:58 am
by MegAzumarill
I will hammer almost any DL wagon if it comes too close, but I'd like a Kop elim today if possible.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:15 pm
by Radical Rat
Meg should not be allowed to hammer.
Investigation immunity is a unique and verifiable property, and overriding that with Miller makes that claim unverifiable.

In Dwlee's case, however, if they're lying, they're scum anyway, so becoming a Miller would change nothing.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:28 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 630, Radical Rat wrote:Meg should not be allowed to hammer.
Investigation immunity is a unique and verifiable property, and overriding that with Miller makes that claim unverifiable.

In Dwlee's case, however, if they're lying, they're scum anyway, so becoming a Miller would change nothing.

It wouldn't overide as far as I'm aware. The invest actions would still fail.

If I get investigated successfully as anything I should be limmed anyway.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 12:42 pm
by Gamma Emerald
What does investigation immunity mean? Are investigative actions on you treated as if they are roleblocked or do they return to most favorable outcome?

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:02 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 632, Gamma Emerald wrote:What does investigation immunity mean? Are investigative actions on you treated as if they are roleblocked or do they return to most favorable outcome?

Investigative actions on me fail. (I.e. as if roleblocked)

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:08 pm
by Gamma Emerald
okay yeah in that case being miller would change nothing unless the investigative was strongwilled

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:29 pm
by NDMath
In post 625, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 585, Save The Dragons wrote:hate 312 just seems like fluff
comes off as forced. being null on mom isn't controversial, and while being pro RR might be, i really dislike the DOTW vote justification (floating) when see .
I don't really townread ari currently, but to me 383 is his best post so it's weird that that's the one he's getting voted for. I also just don't get why the dotw vote and 312 are contradictory? Like 312 is saying no results are occurring from people tryna get the game moving and the vote is for a particular player barely trying to make stuff happen at that point in time.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:32 pm
by NDMath
In post 630, Radical Rat wrote:Meg should not be allowed to hammer.
Investigation immunity is a unique and verifiable property, and overriding that with Miller makes that claim unverifiable.

In Dwlee's case, however, if they're lying, they're scum anyway, so becoming a Miller would change nothing.
RR's beliefs towards dwlee's and Mega's claims are still rather eerie to me.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:45 pm
by NDMath
I'm struggling with that Kop's posts are more, philosophical(?) than direct thoughts. I have to assume it's primarily a posting style thing, but it makes him seem fencesitty in most of his opinions.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:07 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 637, NDMath wrote:I'm struggling with that Kop's posts are more, philosophical(?) than direct thoughts. I have to assume it's primarily a posting style thing, but it makes him seem fencesitty in most of his opinions.
It feels to me almost completely noncommittal. Reeks of scum trying to add "content" by adding squat

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:11 pm
by the 2 mastinas
2mDuring DAY, only 1 100-letter'r
2m
T

A50
GE
Ari
Tits
D99
Meg

LT

Yu
ki

S
ky

sb
9


N

Taro
ND
unw
R
R


S

KT/K
STD
DotW

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:13 pm
by MegAzumarill
Welcome back from the grave, if only for a moment

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:43 pm
by Dragon of the West
I'm assuming that's a type of tree stump? So each day they can only post 100 letters?

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:45 pm
by Dragon of the West
StD is prob town for scum reading Gamma alone. I guess he could just be aware that's how he always feels and it's mimicking that town!StD play, but I'll say it's town for now

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:48 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 641, Dragon of the West wrote:I'm assuming that's a type of tree stump? So each day they can only post 100 letters?
seems so
looks like I was right all along :cool:

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:49 pm
by Dragon of the West
I don't think either of Ari's or ND's reasons for voting me are any good. Doubt partners would double up like that right away though so probably only one of them is scum at most.

Also @ND - it wasn't why me, it was "this is a dumb thing to nitpick given the state of the game". And as StD pointed out, Ari had literally JUST said how nothing at all happened over the course of multiple pages. Some real good "floating by" by Ari there

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 3:54 pm
by NDMath
Alright, I'm understanding.
VOTE: Kop


"DAY"
I'm hypothesizing they can post indefinitely at night.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 3:57 pm
by MegAzumarill
IC post restricted treestump

This game is weird

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 3:59 pm
by Aristophanes
In post 600, Dragon of the West wrote:
In post 392, Dragon of the West wrote:
In post 198, Aristophanes wrote:Post restrictions seem likely
What are "post restrictions"?
In post 393, Dragon of the West wrote:I'm fine with unwnd's interactions with me after my vote there. Probably town.

I'll vote back at Ari here. Your complaint about me could be made about at least half of the people in the game and I think focusing on me "floating along" right after I go VLA is creating a test that you know I'll probably fail so you can keep pushing a fake scumread on me
VOTE: Ari
@Ari - at least acknowledge me if you're gonna let your vote sit idly on me
The "floating along" criticism was about your posts in general, not your activity. Your v/la had no part in it. That's not how I roll.

Yes, the whole thread was floating at certain points but your body of posts contained almost nothing but. That was why I voted you.

Also I saw a question I forgot to addrsss as to whether my vote on you was OMGUS and no. It wasn't. I don't even remember if you were voting me at the time I made it.

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 4:00 pm
by Aristophanes
I saw a lot of votes on me. Let me know if I need to claim

Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2021 4:15 pm
by Dragon of the West
In post 647, Aristophanes wrote:Also I saw a question I forgot to addrsss as to whether my vote on you was OMGUS and no. It wasn't. I don't even remember if you were voting me at the time I made it.
You voted me first. I voted you for your read of me seeming fake and disjointed from game state