Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:41 am
VOTE: frogsfrogs
Until I get some satisfactory answers to my questions.
Until I get some satisfactory answers to my questions.
Not entirely, I'm still suspicious of Greeting right now. And I also think you are the biggest candidate for who I think could be deepwolfing but that's just gut and very unfounded.In post 607, implosion wrote:Re: Greeting. At this point I think it's entirely possible that my townread on him has stemmed from confirmation bias on a couple things I was reading too strongly in to early. That said, I also do want to gut townread the self-hammer thing still; if someone threatens that and is brought to E-1 then they have to either go through with it (which ofc scum has not much reason to do) or back out of it (which looks very bad). The act of saying "well just bring me to e-1 so i can selfhammer then" has not much utility for scum to say. I think that kind of second-level "doing something explicitly negative utility for the town cred" play happens not that often.
StrangeMatter: am I right in reading that you haven't really indicated active suspicion on anyone other than possibly catboi (and even then I'm uncertain) at this point? You've given a lot of questions and commentary but I don't feel like I have a good sense of where you stand on things.
Obviously scum doesn't want to take the risk and be eliminated at this point, but it seems like you aren't really acknowledging what I've said, just saying that you wouldn't do it as scum is not a good argument, and I've done that before. Also, why are you trying to bluff saying you would do that? It's already been somewhat stated in another post that self voting is very anti town, and something you should never do.In post 597, Greeting wrote:There’s virtually no reason for me to hammer myself on Day One if I’m scum. ItIn post 595, StrangeMatter wrote:Okay, so then according to that logic couldn't your self vote also fall under "It's scumplay and its goal is to be brushed off as incompetence"?In post 594, Greeting wrote:They made a few statements which contradict one another. Expanding on what I said in 582, you don’t sound very believable if you change your version multiple times. It occurs to me that the lies were brushed off by catboi as newbie nonsense, but I don’t share that view. I think it’s scumplay and its goal is to be brushed off as incompetence.In post 468, StrangeMatter wrote:Here's a question for Greeting, why do you not trust igorsprite's tracker claim exactly? Because I feel like a lot of the logic makes it hard to assume that.couldmake sense late in the game - as a way to divert the blame from the other scum member, but there is absolutely nothing a scum could gain from being voted out Day One. Val has, however, made a point that pretending to put myself at risk could be a way for me to gain towncred, since I wasn’t really in danger of getting voted out at that time. I guess that if you want to find out if I’m a man of my word, you’ll have to put me at E-1 to find out.
Yes, they were opposite, but I think both were very internally consistent, seemed real, and are anchored in town logic. That's my point here. I consider the roleset strategizing to be probably a bad move, but implosion never thought it was an issue. He makes a post about this just after Val's entrance, 134, but then he's gone for the next few pages wherein greeting/val/mafmen argue. When he comments again, he says he still thinks the same way about the strategizing being fine, but that Val looks super townie for how he's reacted, 183 and 186, and he pushes back at greeting to try and convince him of this, too. I think 188 and 191 are both great examples-- he feels really strongly about this read and is trying to wrangle the both of them into stepping back and seeing what he sees. I think it's genuine and don't see why appealing to greeting is good for scum here, when it's a situation easily jumped on, either. Val I've spoken about before-- I really believe this is something he was irritated by after knowing it to have happened in a game already, given the depth of explanation he gives and the emotional progression as he and greeting argue. 156 as a specific example if you'd like.In post 623, catboi wrote:But their reactions to Greeting were entirely the opposite. How do they both come across as "making sense" when they have completely different reactions? What do you understand about what they're doing? It can't be that hard to point to a single thing, right?
In post 623, catboi wrote: - Why do you see val as a "viable train", when exactly three people have expressed suspicion of him, and you're scumleaning everyone doing it? Who do you think is going to make Val a potential elim here?
I have the unfortunate, maybe emotional :/, reaction of feeling like some of this is attempting to make me doubt my own understanding of the game state. Genuinely, this and my own life schedule are why I did not respond fully before. It's not questioning that's the issue, but these two questions seem like no matter what I answer, you can jump on me for it. You know already I don't trust your motivations in this game, here, but apologies anyways if I can't fully see these as 100% good faith.In post 623, catboi wrote:Is MafMen an option? No one's voting him.Ihaven't voted him. I already said I thought his response was town-leaning. And, again, he's your second highest scumread, so how does that make any sense at all?
Majorly, his suspicion of Igor. :T I truly think it's a silly opinion, especially that he's still holding it now, even if you disagree with his plays.In post 623, catboi wrote:- What about Greeting's posting is "weird", and why do you find that to be potentially scum-indicative?
Implosion has frequently contributed to discussions in ways that moves discussion along and he does it in ways I think are good for town and agree with. Obviously this is subjective, but like, the inverse of saying x player is scummy for going down distracting rabbit holes and saying things just for saying them. 438, 344, getting back to questioning Maf in 69 are good imo. I think it's less plausible that this is a brilliant scum performance than just being townie.In post 623, catboi wrote:- What questions of implosion's are "incisive"? What about "making his own thoughts clear" is a towntell exactly? Why don't scum want to make their thoughts clear?
See above x2. Honestly I think your own outspoken-ness has been mostly reactive and I disagree that it hasn't been something scum could do. Val's way of making enemies and scum hunting is, again, less plausible to me as a scum move than him just actually being town.In post 623, catboi wrote:- Has it placed a target on him, though? He's not even come close to being an elimination. Wouldn't "being outspoken" and "placing a massive target on his back" equally describe me? What do you think he's done that's "placed correctly" and "good for town"?
Okay, this at least makesIn post 630, frogsfrogs wrote:Yes, they were opposite, but I think both were very internally consistent, seemed real, and are anchored in town logic. That's my point here. I consider the roleset strategizing to be probably a bad move, but implosion never thought it was an issue. He makes a post about this just after Val's entrance, 134, but then he's gone for the next few pages wherein greeting/val/mafmen argue. When he comments again, he says he still thinks the same way about the strategizing being fine, but that Val looks super townie for how he's reacted, 183 and 186, and he pushes back at greeting to try and convince him of this, too. I think 188 and 191 are both great examples-- he feels really strongly about this read and is trying to wrangle the both of them into stepping back and seeing what he sees. I think it's genuine and don't see why appealing to greeting is good for scum here, when it's a situation easily jumped on, either. Val I've spoken about before-- I really believe this is something he was irritated by after knowing it to have happened in a game already, given the depth of explanation he gives and the emotional progression as he and greeting argue. 156 as a specific example if you'd like.
Shrug, I'm trying to make you JUSTIFY your understand of this because I need to grasp your perspective. It feels like you are quite literally only looking at this from possible angles where I am scum, and have put basically no consideration into worlds where I am town, so I don't really care for the emotional appeal at the start of this. Anyway, I'm not evenIn post 630, frogsfrogs wrote:I have the unfortunate, maybe emotional :/, reaction of feeling like some of this is attempting to make me doubt my own understanding of the game state. Genuinely, this and my own life schedule are why I did not respond fully before. It's not questioning that's the issue, but these two questions seem like no matter what I answer, you can jump on me for it. You know already I don't trust your motivations in this game, here, but apologies anyways if I can't fully see these as 100% good faith.
Going into this day I totally thought there could have been a push for Val. As you mention, there are three pretty strong scum reads of him, we had no idea of StrangeMatter's reads (plus they gave an ambivalent one of him shortly before Maf voted), I didn't realize implosion's townread was as strong as it actually is upon re-read (Guess I had the impression it faded a bit over time?), and igor has, a few times, voted very quickly for someone after a case is made for them being scum. It's not as viable currently as I thought it was, sure. As for MafMen, I absolutely think he's still an option? I'm of the impression he's the second-most widely scumread. I'm aware thinking that you two could be the maf team and that you want to vote out MafMen is odd, but I fully believe either could be true. Thus PoE.
Does weird = scum? What benefit does Greeting-scum get from suspecting igorsprite here? Do you think that is a play scum is likely to make?In post 630, frogsfrogs wrote:Majorly, his suspicion of Igor. :T I truly think it's a silly opinion, especially that he's still holding it now, even if you disagree with his plays.
All of the questions cited are really unconvincing, asking igorsprite what his tracker report was is super easy for scum to do, as is asking MafMen why he thought greeting was probtown, especially seeing as multiple people jumped on him for that post, so I see that question as not super original or incisive at all? Which leaves only the question to thynhith, which, sure, could be plausibly scumhunting-ish but ultimately we know for a fact it's just attacking a townie for being incorrect n something.In post 630, frogsfrogs wrote:Implosion has frequently contributed to discussions in ways that moves discussion along and he does it in ways I think are good for town and agree with. Obviously this is subjective, but like, the inverse of saying x player is scummy for going down distracting rabbit holes and saying things just for saying them. 438, 344, getting back to questioning Maf in 69 are good imo. I think it's less plausible that this is a brilliant scum performance than just being townie.
This is, again, super vague and unsatisfactory. I've been reactive because I got fake guiltied by a troll who isn't trying to play the game and people are using my response as justification for my own guilt. None of that is explicitly clearing, I'd be righteously pissed off as scum too, but if my response is to just sling mud at everyone voting me that just gets me killed. I've beenIn post 630, frogsfrogs wrote:See above x2. Honestly I think your own outspoken-ness has been mostly reactive and I disagree that it hasn't been something scum could do. Val's way of making enemies and scum hunting is, again, less plausible to me as a scum move than him just actually being town.
I'm not really interested in forcing a particular perspective, my own view of the game right now is extremely unsettled and my goal here is to readIn post 636, implosion wrote:I've known you were someone from EM but I was never quite sure exactly who/I perennially confuse which account from each site corresponds in what way.
I can re-evaluate frogs (and catch up generally) tomorrow but don't have the energy/focus to right now; who else do you think should be in my scum pool that isn't?
Can you please explain more to this?In post 619, Greeting wrote:And regarding catboi... I admit that I skimmed through the posts which built up their wagon but nothing really picked my interest. It was intense enough to make them mad, and that’s all I gathered from it. Perhaps there is some bias involved on my part, but catboi wouldn’t be my pick for an eliminating vote today.
don't be pessimisticIn post 635, catboi wrote: If both are town here then I suspect the game is as good as lost so I really have to hope that isn't the case here, don't know what else I can do.
you've shown basically no desire to take the game seriously, you claim you're here to learn but there's basically no attempts to engage with meaningful dialogue with other players, any attempts to discuss your own reasoning have you barely giving any effort in response, your actions ingame come across as someone who's bored more than anything. you strike me as someone who just isn't interested in the style of game here, period, and are basically impossible to work with. Maybe I'm wrong and have misjudged you but you've shown basically no concern for what anyone else thinks so far. Instead you just treat the game as your own sandbox to screw around in.In post 642, igorsprite wrote:don't be pessimisticIn post 635, catboi wrote: If both are town here then I suspect the game is as good as lost so I really have to hope that isn't the case here, don't know what else I can do.
that always happens when i'm town, especially when i'm a PR ;.;In post 643, catboi wrote: you've shown basically no desire to take the game seriously, you claim you're here to learn but there's basically no attempts to engage with meaningful dialogue with other players, any attempts to discuss your own reasoning have you barely giving any effort in response, your actions ingame come across as someone who's bored more than anything. you strike me as someone who just isn't interested in the style of game here, period, and are basically impossible to work with. Maybe I'm wrong and have misjudged you but you've shown basically no concern for what anyone else thinks so far. Instead you just treat the game as your own sandbox to screw around in.
Lol, ironic, just said I was holding off on rereading him. I have a vague townlean based on him looking like he's dealing with legitimate indecision in his read on me (although that kind of thing can be an excuse to hold back for a bit only to vote me later), but that's a shaky foundation for a read, I want to look back more in depth sometime today.In post 646, StrangeMatter wrote:I have a question, Catboi what are your current thoughts on MafMen?