Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2022 3:20 am
Marci please claim, I want to bring down the hammer
Why'd you say this originally? Without reasons it just looks like your chickening out.In post 571, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:However I'm not certain She's scum anymore.
I find marcistar's posts the least helpful. So no, I'm not opposed. I guess statistics still say marcistar is more likely town, but that doesn't matter.In post 633, TTTT wrote:PPP are you opposed to a marci elim here?
Are those reads independant though? If furtiveglance and marcistar are both mafia, that would mean marcistar made "the most well thought-out case in the game" against the other mafia player. Do you think that is something marcistar would do?In post 564, Mr Turtle wrote:The furtiveglance read and the marcistar read are largely independent. I thought marcistar's post on furtiveglance was the townies thing she had done up to that point and I agreed with some of the reasonings in the post. I don't see the need to do associative reads before we have a concrete alignment flip. With that being said, I'd like to revisit my scum and town leans (including furtiveglance) soon.In post 542, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Mr Turtle could you expand on why you scum-read furtiveglance after #1 scum-reading marcistar, who you said made the most well thought out case against furtiveglance?
If marcistar flips town, I'd be more cautious of Luke. Scum!Luke benefits from not committing on a read on marcistar. At the same time Luke has been towny in areas not pertaining marci. So to answer your question, yes I'd move Luke down to a town lean or null range if marcistar flips town.
When I say independent, I mean that I read them independently. Yes, if marcistar flips mafia, I think that makes furtiveglance look much better. I don't think marcistar makes her first case on her scum buddy.In post 636, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Will just say this though.Are those reads independant though? If furtiveglance and marcistar are both mafia, that would mean marcistar made "the most well thought-out case in the game" against the other mafia player. Do you think that is something marcistar would do?In post 564, Mr Turtle wrote:The furtiveglance read and the marcistar read are largely independent. I thought marcistar's post on furtiveglance was the townies thing she had done up to that point and I agreed with some of the reasonings in the post. I don't see the need to do associative reads before we have a concrete alignment flip. With that being said, I'd like to revisit my scum and town leans (including furtiveglance) soon.In post 542, PlmPestPlaY wrote:Mr Turtle could you expand on why you scum-read furtiveglance after #1 scum-reading marcistar, who you said made the most well thought out case against furtiveglance?
That's a good point that honestly didn't occur to me because as I said in 590, the busing thing is what I would have done.In post 607, Lukewarm wrote:Why do you jump to him being desperate to bus his partner vs desperate to save his partner (Marci) vs wanting to look like he was trying to stop a town miselimin (Marci) depending on how she flips?In post 571, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:PPP: something is very off about their posting, they seem desperate to get somnus voted off, I wonder if it is a bus.
TTTT accused me of possibly being scum with Marcistar and I freaked out.In post 610, Lukewarm wrote:@Goldie, what changed in the like 20 mins between these posts?
So firstly I originally unvoted Marcistar because I wasn't ready for the day to end since I only just joined and I wanted to interact more with some players and get reads. NOT because I didn't think she was scum.In post 610, Lukewarm wrote:Lots of questions.
Why were you certain to begin with?
What changed your mind to being uncertain?
What prodded you towards putting it back?
I said this because I realised I had 3 different people who I thought were scum and there can only be 2 mafia which means that one of those people is actually town.In post 626, marcistar wrote:Why'd you say this originally? Without reasons it just looks like your chickening out.In post 571, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:However I'm not certain She's scum anymore.
This is an unexpectedly candid answer. Thank you.In post 638, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:TTTT accused me of possibly being scum with Marcistar and I freaked out.In post 610, Lukewarm wrote:@Goldie, what changed in the like 20 mins between these posts?
To pull the pin back out of this - Furtive, this is basically why.In post 623, Lukewarm wrote:Putting a pin in this.In post 622, furtiveglance wrote:Well I'm not informed, it's just the most obvious scumteam right now, which is never usually the case.
Have a response, but think it bad to express right this second
Not sure I know how to feel about it with her being this open with it though. Definitely something to think about over the night phase.In post 639, Lukewarm wrote:This is an unexpectedly candid answer. Thank you.In post 638, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:TTTT accused me of possibly being scum with Marcistar and I freaked out.In post 610, Lukewarm wrote:@Goldie, what changed in the like 20 mins between these posts?
In post 640, Lukewarm wrote:Not sure I know how to feel about it with her being this open with it though. Definitely something to think about over the night phase.In post 639, Lukewarm wrote:This is an unexpectedly candid answer. Thank you.In post 638, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:TTTT accused me of possibly being scum with Marcistar and I freaked out.In post 610, Lukewarm wrote:@Goldie, what changed in the like 20 mins between these posts?
It seems that Marci has chosen not to claim
VOTE: Marci
Spoiler: @furtive
Can you give us some reads?????In post 644, marcistar wrote: Bet you they'll ignore my reads too!
you posted after intent to hammer was givenIn post 643, marcistar wrote:"chosen not to claim"
bruh i literally just got home from work what
But anyways its fine yall wouldnt get off my ass no matter what I say so this is needed.
The fact that Marcistar isn't giving any is very suspicious