Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 7:53 am
like this is 625. i dont wanna be thinking about 178 at this point.
Did you ever stop avoiding every chance to talk about my slot in yourIn post 623, Eiralox wrote:@Gandhi current stuff please
The past doesn't get invalidated, not for me at least.In post 625, Eiralox wrote:like this is 625. i dont wanna be thinking about 178 at this point.
I don't even know it.In post 627, Eiralox wrote:uggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh let me repeat myself for a third time: what are your thoughts on current game state?
I think what Eiralox is trying to say is that it's difficult to read you when you are only engaging with things that happened early on in the dayIn post 628, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:The past doesn't get invalidated, not for me at least.In post 625, Eiralox wrote:like this is 625. i dont wanna be thinking about 178 at this point.
Hmm.. did you sin something in the past?
I already answered you about the current affairs.In post 633, Eiralox wrote:we almost had a hammer. we had two replaces. i don;t want your opinions on past shit. i'm asking you to give your thoughts on current stuff, current actions. regardless of whether ur what, gandhi, if u only retro-engage i see less value in your slot. be in the moment while also erecting your walls. cos right now I don;t have a feel of exactly where u at cos u in the past.
Why
I really wanted to make/give my full thoughts for 1 game, but clearly I'm a bit lacking on the time commitment part.In post 636, Ausuka wrote:I think what Eiralox is trying to say is that it's difficult to read you when you are only engaging with things that happened early on in the dayIn post 628, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:The past doesn't get invalidated, not for me at least.In post 625, Eiralox wrote:like this is 625. i dont wanna be thinking about 178 at this point.
Hmm.. did you sin something in the past?
fuck me this is the last time i talk with u in a long while. if you want to type walls about inutile and juice go ahead. if this is how you are going to be all game i'd vote for you on simple principle. you're lucky that we're both on greeting rn. if you don't have any currently relevant content soon i might consider building an actual case on you. please don't engage with me for a while because i can see i'm going to become toxic. now imma scrap some space stations.In post 640, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:I already answered you about the current affairs.In post 633, Eiralox wrote:we almost had a hammer. we had two replaces. i don;t want your opinions on past shit. i'm asking you to give your thoughts on current stuff, current actions. regardless of whether ur what, gandhi, if u only retro-engage i see less value in your slot. be in the moment while also erecting your walls. cos right now I don;t have a feel of exactly where u at cos u in the past.
If you want to know where I am, you can try reading my posts. Shocker, I know.
You might want to answer my question btw.
Now, to be perfectly honest, you feel like you're trying to look productive while trying incriminate me and invalidate the past. That's coming from a slot who said they'lllook for my partnersbut then avoiding every and any chance to talk about my slot? Don't lecture me about productivity, k, thx, bye.
And, no, I don't believe any thought I post about the past has been made by someone already. That's ludicrous. I do believe the value of my obserations.
Fine then, so be it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯In post 638, Nero Cain wrote:You might be our default elimination mostly b/c you aren't really helping yourself. thoughts?
3rd time I've asked thisIn post 619, Nero Cain wrote:I still want to know why Frog unvoted Gandi to join a smaller Juice wagon while still scum reading Gandhi.
341, 342
You would build a case on me?In post 645, Eiralox wrote:fuck me this is the last time i talk with u in a long while. if you want to type walls about inutile and juice go ahead. if this is how you are going to be all game i'd vote for you on simple principle. you're lucky that we're both on greeting rn. if you don't have any currently relevant content soon i might consider building an actual case on you. please don't engage with me for a while because i can see i'm going to become toxic. now imma scrap some space stations.In post 640, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:I already answered you about the current affairs.In post 633, Eiralox wrote:we almost had a hammer. we had two replaces. i don;t want your opinions on past shit. i'm asking you to give your thoughts on current stuff, current actions. regardless of whether ur what, gandhi, if u only retro-engage i see less value in your slot. be in the moment while also erecting your walls. cos right now I don;t have a feel of exactly where u at cos u in the past.
If you want to know where I am, you can try reading my posts. Shocker, I know.
You might want to answer my question btw.
Now, to be perfectly honest, you feel like you're trying to look productive while trying incriminate me and invalidate the past. That's coming from a slot who said they'lllook for my partnersbut then avoiding every and any chance to talk about my slot? Don't lecture me about productivity, k, thx, bye.
And, no, I don't believe any thought I post about the past has been made by someone already. That's ludicrous. I do believe the value of my obserations.
They're playing like Newb!Scum. I would know.