See 1214 for why I originally scumlocked you. See 1534 for why I thought Dann could be town.In post 6274, NanceFloor wrote:eh TL you could be town
I just need you to be honest with how your reads are progressing
don't try to make it seem more natural than it is
Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.In post 6271, NanceFloor wrote:I will always take Creature over Chemist as scum in that pair. Chemist is town.
the strategy for scum!creature is to:
divert the protect onto Titus > try to flip Chemist > push to lynch RC as a deep wolf or otherwise somehow get rid of him after Chemist flips town > nightkill Nancefloor > scum victory
- d
your vote says otherwise.In post 6286, Skygazer wrote:im town
I don’t know if he is but compared with Creature, he has been as laid back and anti-agenday about everything. Creature “worrying” so much about Chemist flipping town, pings me as a bit as TMI, where as Chemist doesn’t seem to be hedging his bets like that.In post 6277, Skygazer wrote:nanceeeee why is chemist town
That and if Creature wants to drive the protect on anyone, it would probably be himself or Moon, is what I’m guessing but I think it’s pretty clear he he wants scum to be able to kill RC. Creature has been setting up everyone in the first failed coalition as scum save PB before the veto. So, it reads to me, that if/when Chemist flips town, he can then shift the blame for 1st coalition failing on RC, me or Sky and I don’t view that as a townie mindset.In post 6279, Titus wrote:Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.In post 6271, NanceFloor wrote:I will always take Creature over Chemist as scum in that pair. Chemist is town.
the strategy for scum!creature is to:
divert the protect onto Titus > try to flip Chemist > push to lynch RC as a deep wolf or otherwise somehow get rid of him after Chemist flips town > nightkill Nancefloor > scum victory
- d
Right now, Creature has acknowledged he and Chemist need to die. Once Creature or Chemist flips scum, then we turn to lynching in my group as it is the only place with confirmed scum (and why I wanted to confirm scum in my coalition).
I put my money on scum killing me, since I have an autowin plan.In post 6291, NanceFloor wrote:That and if Creature wants to drive the protect on anyone, it would probably be himself or Moon, is what I’m guessing but I think it’s pretty clear he he wants scum to be able to kill RC. Creature has been setting up everyone in the first failed coalition as scum save PB before the veto. So, it reads to me, that if/when Chemist flips town, he can then shift the blame for 1st coalition failing on RC, me or Sky and I don’t view that as a townie mindset.In post 6279, Titus wrote:Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.In post 6271, NanceFloor wrote:I will always take Creature over Chemist as scum in that pair. Chemist is town.
the strategy for scum!creature is to:
divert the protect onto Titus > try to flip Chemist > push to lynch RC as a deep wolf or otherwise somehow get rid of him after Chemist flips town > nightkill Nancefloor > scum victory
- d
Right now, Creature has acknowledged he and Chemist need to die. Once Creature or Chemist flips scum, then we turn to lynching in my group as it is the only place with confirmed scum (and why I wanted to confirm scum in my coalition).
Because there is an NK after Arena and guardamnteed, scum will target RC or us, maybe Sky or Succinct but RC and us are the biggest threats to scum in this game, so no protect is inherently anttown, imo.
I'm sorry I don't think highly of your play based off only this gameIn post 6279, Titus wrote:Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.
- DannIn post 6294, NanceFloor wrote:I'm sorry I don't think highly of your play based off only this gameIn post 6279, Titus wrote:Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.
Dann, I am afraid you and Nancy don't think using inductive and deductive logic simultaneously. I am rather brutal in that I think more with stone cold logic as town unless something feels off.In post 6295, NanceFloor wrote:- DannIn post 6294, NanceFloor wrote:I'm sorry I don't think highly of your play based off only this gameIn post 6279, Titus wrote:Plot hole. That strategy doesn't work with a town Titus.
???In post 6290, RadiantCowbells wrote:Ur not helping my posting thoughts right now
And I'm afraid your logic isn't as air tight as you think it is. But it's really no use discussing this now, what's done is done.In post 6297, Titus wrote:Dann, I am afraid you and Nancy don't think using inductive and deductive logic simultaneously. I am rather brutal in that I think more with stone cold logic as town unless something feels off.