Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2021 2:34 pm
We have a universally agreed upon pool don't let it get torn up
In post 6320, Taly wrote:Point 5- Do you have the post of Dunn discouraging you from looking into Gamma?
In post 2262, Dunnstral wrote:Putting my thoughts on gamma aside:In post 2255, ulyana wrote:so you'd default to gamma being exempt from duel to determine after if we've received benefit?In post 2244, Dunnstral wrote:I think it will be more clear whether we've received a benefit when we know more about the event.
hm, i think this makes some sense, though if gamma is a scums that leaves only 3 for us to hit 2 within with other choices
If we wanted to eliminate him, we had a chance to do so. We didn't take it. It's nonsense to try to eliminate him again using a seperate game mechanic, it would mean we wasted power
,In post 6322, ulyana wrote:i thought way they reacted to pooky dieing without missing a beat or factoring into further decisions was ??? like I said at the timeIn post 6320, Taly wrote:Point 1- What do you make of their kingmaker choice then?
trying to weigh gammagooey alignment off of unsure gamma emerald alignment for all of this feels not a good task to try to undertake because could easily see reasoning for choosing town or scum
I'd agree with this but I have no clue where to begin to trying to decipher what the benefit was. It was not meant to be clear to town. Do you have ideas?In post 6323, ulyana wrote:if gamma emerald is town, we were supposed to get benefit from sparing them, so if we can identify very likely benefit, then gamma emerald likely town, if no benefit, then scum, so trying to find benefit worthwhile though pretty defeating process because like, it’s meant to be somewhat hidden but the ones i can find aren’t even really benefits so probably aren’t itIn post 6320, Taly wrote:Point 4- I'm failing to see the significance of Toog-town being part of the duel relates to Gamma's alignment.
I've got thoughts onIn post 6325, SirCakez wrote:We have a universally agreed upon pool don't let it get torn up
In post 6326, ulyana wrote:In post 6320, Taly wrote:Point 5- Do you have the post of Dunn discouraging you from looking into Gamma?In post 2262, Dunnstral wrote:Putting my thoughts on gamma aside:In post 2255, ulyana wrote:so you'd default to gamma being exempt from duel to determine after if we've received benefit?In post 2244, Dunnstral wrote:I think it will be more clear whether we've received a benefit when we know more about the event.
hm, i think this makes some sense, though if gamma is a scums that leaves only 3 for us to hit 2 within with other choices
If we wanted to eliminate him, we had a chance to do so. We didn't take it. It's nonsense to try to eliminate him again using a seperate game mechanic, it would mean we wasted power
I want to hear your thoughts on the
Not really, I was highly averse to just picking something I thought was shady but hadn’t had a chance to examine through questioning and the leads that pulled up were not ones that felt worth acting on without that due process. And I think Ulyana is twisting things a bit because her questioning back when that was all happening did not feel organic at all, honestly it felt like she was in on the kill and used that to browbeat me for being slow to come to the conclusion I did.In post 6329, Taly wrote:Gamma, did Pooky's death factor in your Ceph shot?
……………..In post 6338, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not really, I was highly averse to just picking something I thought was shady but hadn’t had a chance to examine through questioning and the leads that pulled up were not ones that felt worth acting on without that due process. And I think Ulyana is twisting things a bit because her questioning back when that was all happening did not feel organic at all, honestly it felt like she was in on the kill and used that to browbeat me for being slow to come to the conclusion I did.In post 6329, Taly wrote:Gamma, did Pooky's death factor in your Ceph shot?
like why would i be looking to kill pooky there…In post 6339, ulyana wrote:……………..In post 6338, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not really, I was highly averse to just picking something I thought was shady but hadn’t had a chance to examine through questioning and the leads that pulled up were not ones that felt worth acting on without that due process. And I think Ulyana is twisting things a bit because her questioning back when that was all happening did not feel organic at all, honestly it felt like she was in on the kill and used that to browbeat me for being slow to come to the conclusion I did.In post 6329, Taly wrote:Gamma, did Pooky's death factor in your Ceph shot?
……………………………..
as if my team killing pooky there wouldn’t have always been because i was outvoted on the choice
because pooky likes to muse about setup speculation and share music and is familiar with me and was townreading me and generally makes the game far more enjoyable for me to play regardless of alignmentIn post 6342, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why wouldn’t you
He was townread, he was active, he was seemingly quite savvy to scum’s tactics
Who wouldyouhave voted to kill?
I concur on both points.In post 6346, Gammagooey wrote:Gonna be voting peta into heaven as the final one there
Ulyana no matter what two town players have to go into hell because math - if you have a specific opinion/case you want to state on who you think is most likely scum I think that'd be a lot more helpful at this point than towncasing yourself.
i think i’ve been pretty open about this -In post 6346, Gammagooey wrote:Ulyana no matter what two town players have to go into hell because math - if you have a specific opinion/case you want to state on who you think is most likely scum I think that'd be a lot more helpful at this point than towncasing yourself.