Mafiascum.net

In post 6274, Galron wrote:

In post 6266, T3 wrote:

In post 6255, Galron wrote:T3 did you receive anything Night 2?

Yeah
I got beets, and something else.

How did the beets taste?

My reputation is on the line here.

In post 6314, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 3581, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 3570, GrandpaMo wrote:jjh might be town for this shitty push

I Think If Jjh Is A Traitor It Is More Likely With Victorine

What Better Way To Distance From A Flailing Partner Than To Accuse Someone Else Of Distancing From A Flailing Partner

I Think His Contributions Have Been Pretty Nice So Far However

In post 4080, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 4078, Taly wrote:SS where should my vote go right now?

I Know I Am The Decisive Queen And I Should Be Leading My Subjects But I Want To At Least See A Vote Count First

Victorine Ircher Ratmans Come To Mind As Reasonable Wagons

I Inherited My Predecessor's Vote On Gamma Emerald But I Should Probably Take That Off Because I Haven't Minded His Content So Far

Let's Go Here For Now VOTE: Ratmans

I see you SS. You can run, but you can't hide bb
~C

In post 6321, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 6314, Cheeky Wings wrote:I see you SS. You can run, but you can't hide bb

I Didn't Start The Ratmans Wagon If That's What You're Implying

In post 6329, Cheeky Wings wrote:I'm trying to say that you knew Vic and GMo were scum when you tried to chainsaw JJH and you voted ratmans and Ircher over Vic when Vic was in your poe D1. It all looks pretty obvious in hindsight since we know some alignments now.
~C

In post 6312, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6310, Loftwing wrote:Unrelated: I find Titus to be suspicious here.

She’s dead and flipped tpr. Thenks for your extremely helpful input.

In post 6335, Loftwing wrote:

In post 6312, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6310, Loftwing wrote:Unrelated: I find Titus to be suspicious here.

She’s dead and flipped tpr. Thenks for your extremely helpful input.

Really? Who flipped them? I didn't see them flip

In post 6336, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Loftwing

In post 6329, Cheeky Wings wrote:I'm trying to say that you knew Vic and GMo were scum when you tried to chainsaw JJH and you voted ratmans and Ircher over Vic when Vic was in your poe D1. It all looks pretty obvious in hindsight since we know some alignments now.
~C

In post 6338, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6336, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Loftwing

Dats’ NK I think proves at least one scum in WB because Titus was confirmed tpr in main thread but Dats was only confitowned by NK15 in ours.

In post 6340, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 6338, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6336, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Loftwing

Dats’ NK I think proves at least one scum in WB because Titus was confirmed tpr in main thread but Dats was only confitowned by NK15 in ours.

I dont understand this logic?
Are you implying there's no scum in EB? Also didnt you guys say GMo flipped scum? He was in WB no?
All this split that happened on day 3 is confusing me.

In post 6341, Cheeky Wings wrote:No of course I’m not saying no scum in EB but NK15 contowned Dats in WB and he was the NK flip posted in that pt, so logic suggests that scum likely had some way to have found out about this, because he wasn’t confitowned anywhere else but in WB.

In post 6339, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 6329, Cheeky Wings wrote:I'm trying to say that you knew Vic and GMo were scum when you tried to chainsaw JJH and you voted ratmans and Ircher over Vic when Vic was in your poe D1. It all looks pretty obvious in hindsight since we know some alignments now.
~C

Yeah Totally That's Why I Switched To Victorine Three Pages Later And Never Voted Ircher

Did You Even Read My Iso Before Posting This

In post 6342, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 6341, Cheeky Wings wrote:No of course I’m not saying no scum in EB but NK15 contowned Dats in WB and he was the NK flip posted in that pt, so logic suggests that scum likely had some way to have found out about this, because he wasn’t confitowned anywhere else but in WB.

So, you're saying we should focus on WB today then?

In post 6244, Deimos27 wrote:Actually yeah probably T3 does need to die

In post 6245, Deimos27 wrote:Actually idk I was thinking it makes more sense that Mo wanted T3 to help clear him and made the hood claim before T3 was on board with the plan and T3 backed out than that Mo was trying to take a townie down with him. But idk how confirming the hood claim would actually help Mo clear himself at all