Mafiascum.net

Bell why do you even scumread me?

I really doubt Pooky is town. But you do you. I probably won't try further though until I have a reason to reconsider. Pooky's statements so far have made my scum read deeper red. Pooky thrives on engagement.

In post 6350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Bell why do you even scumread me?

You're scum reading me. You're not bad enough to misread me. Ergo, you're scum.

In post 6352, Bell wrote:

In post 6350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Bell why do you even scumread me?

You're scum reading me. You're not bad enough to misread me. Ergo, you're scum.

You scumread me before I ever scumread you so try again

Too late to change your mind, no take backs.

What was your original reason for scumreading me

In post 6349, Dwlee99 wrote:I mean I care more about Enchant actually doing things than Andante.

Why have you been limiting engagement? I'm convinced it's in a group of 3 so if one of you town tells enough it's a dub

I doubt Enchant is going to do much even if you wait forever.
Because of Pokemon' the last time I 1v1'd Pooky I lost. I need to step up my game and change my approach so I've tried my best to kill him by trying to save GL so we have more space to mess up.

In post 6352, Bell wrote:

In post 6350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Bell why do you even scumread me?

You're scum reading me. You're not bad enough to misread me. Ergo, you're scum.

I have misread you when I'm town in previous games

In post 6355, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:What was your original reason for scumreading me

Overwhelming negativity.

In post 6358, Bell wrote:

In post 6355, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:What was your original reason for scumreading me

Overwhelming negativity.

that's not a feature of my scum game

Then CSF posted a thing, I acknowledged it and backed up a bit. Since you were super duper negative in that game.
Also, I'm perfectly happy to sheep Mena. My pet hypothesis is that the reason Misty slipped by their awareness/focus was simply because he found scum you instead.

my scum game esp in large themes tends to be jokey and happy and mostly banter and memes

my negativity is mostly confined to my town game when I get fustrated

In post 6360, Bell wrote:Then CSF posted a thing, I acknowledged it and backed up a bit. Since you were super duper negative in that game.
Also, I'm perfectly happy to sheep Mena. My pet hypothesis is that the reason Misty slipped by their awareness/focus was simply because he found scum you instead.

Mena's literally been wrong about every read he's made this game so why would you be happy to sheep him?

Sure, but given Pokemon, you couldn't have been much more negative without eating a ban. The floor for scum and town you is the same.

In post 6363, Bell wrote:Sure, but given Pokemon, you couldn't have been much more negative without eating a ban. The floor for scum and town you is the same.

I was negative in pokemon because you called me a trumpist gaslighter

In post 6362, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6360, Bell wrote:Then CSF posted a thing, I acknowledged it and backed up a bit. Since you were super duper negative in that game.
Also, I'm perfectly happy to sheep Mena. My pet hypothesis is that the reason Misty slipped by their awareness/focus was simply because he found scum you instead.

Mena's literally been wrong about every read he's made this game so why would you be happy to sheep him?

You said the same thing about Koba and the same thing about me.
and you're not a new player, you know this isn't scummy. You know it's not a reason to scum read someone. It's just you being a sophist. Which is a type of scum.

In post 6363, Bell wrote:Sure, but given Pokemon, you couldn't have been much more negative without eating a ban. The floor for scum and town you is the same.

negativity is minus survival in almost all games because negative people tend to get elimmed

I usually do not use negativity when I am scum because it is useless except when you are at 1v1 elo and you need to flood the thread enough to neutralize opposing ate.

In post 6365, Bell wrote:

In post 6362, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6360, Bell wrote:Then CSF posted a thing, I acknowledged it and backed up a bit. Since you were super duper negative in that game.
Also, I'm perfectly happy to sheep Mena. My pet hypothesis is that the reason Misty slipped by their awareness/focus was simply because he found scum you instead.

Mena's literally been wrong about every read he's made this game so why would you be happy to sheep him?

You said the same thing about Koba and the same thing about me.
and you're not a new player, you know this isn't scummy. You know it's not a reason to scum read someone. It's just you being a sophist. Which is a type of scum.

I am asking why you would bet the game on sheeping the reads of someone who has been wrong all game.

I can understand betting the game on sheeping Cabd's reads or RC's reads when they are on the ball and limming scum left and right

I do not understand why you are ok with betting the game on Mena's read when he hasn't been right about anything so far this game.

In post 6364, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6363, Bell wrote:Sure, but given Pokemon, you couldn't have been much more negative without eating a ban. The floor for scum and town you is the same.

I was negative in pokemon because you called me a trumpist gaslighter

It's been too long since I played that game to remember when the negativity started but I'm pretty sure it started with Koba/wen people started pushing you and we both escalated from there. In general, people tend to remember things as they'd like to remember it rather than how things were. People includes me.

Well, I'm not betting the game on his read.
I'm betting the game on my read. Obviously and recently I've ignored players that cased people I thought were town. There are a lot of players I think are town this game, you're the least townie of them. It's never just one reason.

In post 6368, Bell wrote:

In post 6364, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6363, Bell wrote:Sure, but given Pokemon, you couldn't have been much more negative without eating a ban. The floor for scum and town you is the same.

I was negative in pokemon because you called me a trumpist gaslighter

It's been too long since I played that game to remember when the negativity started but I'm pretty sure it started with Koba/wen people started pushing you and we both escalated from there. In general, people tend to remember things as they'd like to remember it rather than how things were. People includes me.

Koba pushed me solo and I matched Koba's tone/loudness because it was necessary to avoid the thread being controlled by them.

I'd rather not re-litigate how the negativity started spiraling but I have a distinct memory in my mind of mostly just trolling with you and having fun until you said that about me and I was offended and started actually rageposting because I am upset about being called something like that when I am simply playing a role that I am forced to play because that is the randomization I was dealt.

Obviously, GL being town and Andante and Enchant letting them live with Dwlee's interactions being anti-associative and CSF probably having a deep polarity between their alignments points directly to you being scum.
Cause I'm not.

In post 6369, Bell wrote:Well, I'm not betting the game on his read.
I'm betting the game on my read. Obviously and recently I've ignored players that cased people I thought were town. There are a lot of players I think are town this game, you're the least townie of them. It's never just one reason.

ok so explain your scum-read of me?

I don't want to religitate it either.

In post 6372, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 6369, Bell wrote:Well, I'm not betting the game on his read.
I'm betting the game on my read. Obviously and recently I've ignored players that cased people I thought were town. There are a lot of players I think are town this game, you're the least townie of them. It's never just one reason.

ok so explain your scum-read of me?

You're scum by POE.