Mafiascum.net

pagetop

In post 6475, Skygazer wrote:pagetop

Hello, betting for 2078: Any Non-Dead Person Can Post In This Mafia Game is now starting.

The question is:



Please quote this and indicate "Yes" or "No".

This is limited to only spectators. If you're playing this game, no one cares about your bet.

no

i dont care about your bet

shut up this is important

In post 6474, Bitmap wrote:Are non-players who are allowed to participate in a mafia game via posting in it allowed to take bets to whether or not town or scum wins?

yes but it has to be an avatar bet

I'm not doing an avatar bet rn

In post 6484, Ankamius wrote:

In post 6464, the worst wrote:Dannflor I'm your biggest fan

In post 6482, xyzzy wrote:

In post 6474, Bitmap wrote:Are non-players who are allowed to participate in a mafia game via posting in it allowed to take bets to whether or not town or scum wins?

yes but it has to be an avatar bet

sounds.... tempting

I feel like RC really appreciates my presence in this game.

In post 6371, RadiantCowbells wrote:unless ofrhz is traitor and mastina flipped out about the implausibility of that because it was true.

Alternatively: I follow occam's razor and literally wrote a fucking article about following probabilities instead of possibilities.

But yaknow.
You decide.

In post 6383, chennisden wrote:"ofrhz is governor, ausuka can't do that!"

Actually given that ofhrz claimed,
1: That his role doesn't work right now, and
2: That even if it did it'd result in a no lynch, Ausuka could in fact hammer and have it end the game because of no govern...and even if there were one, via my hated not going away in lylo, a forced no lynch to prevent a lynch (i.e., a successful use of a govern) = town loses.

Which means:

In post 6422, Ausuka wrote:Not hammering

This is in fact proof Ausuka is town--100%, undeniable, infallible, cannot-be-false, is-completely-inarguable, final evidence beyond any shadow of a doubt that Ausuka is town.

VOTE: ofhrz.

Now, granted.
I still maintain my stance. While this is in fact the proof/evidence of Ausuka being town, it was also the most extreme. RC was fucking stupid to have risked the game on it--yes, it worked; yes, it's undeniable once it did work; yes nothing's stronger than it when it did work, but the simple fact of the matter was, he didn't need to go to that extreme, he didn't need to take a "dangerous shortcut" as it were to the final product and he have fucking convinced me with logic.

Not convinced me with risking the game and pulling it off.

On that note:

In post 6429, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh yeah I have a question mastina
Why were you not okay to vote Ofrhz but okay with having Ausuka hammer tested?

I don't recall ever saying I was okay with having Ausuka hammertested. Please point out where I indicate that; I'll wait.

In fact.

Quite the opposite.

I clearly remember saying that you voting me--which, by proxy, INCLUDES hammertesting--, in my exact words, would be "fucking gamethrowing". Want me to quote that post(s)? Because I was pretty unambiguous here in saying why you shouldn't be voting me for any reason and if you did the loss was on you not me.

It happened to work out, sure. But it was still fucking stupid to do.

In post 6431, RadiantCowbells wrote:Didn't do anything to stop it either

Oh what can I do to stop you from voting me, pray tell?

Do I have any magical power to prevent it?

Your vote is yours. Not mine. There's nothing I could do to fucking stop it; what I could do was voice how it'd be entirely on you which is exactly what I did.

In post 6434, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like if she'd rather lose than see Ofrhz lynched supposedly you would think she would deal with this situation differently

No I want to win.

I made that unambiguous.

I thought that voting ofhrz was a loss.

That doesn't mean "I'd rather lose than see ofhrz be lynched", it means that I fucking think "I think that lynching ofhrz is a loss". I was VERY unambiguous about that.

hi I'm here

what's the easiest way to scumside this game

In post 6436, chennisden wrote:I would've conceded by now

As a rule I don't concede as scum because conceding as scum is fucking stupid; it's not a loss until the mod declares it to be one and almost any situation is, theoretically, winnable--this game especially so given that SOME idiot fuck thinks that the game could be fucking 9:4 with a hated scum roleblocker and traitor in spite of the overwhelming evidence against that stupid-ass theory, and thus could easily vote for the hated townie, resulting in a chance for scum to hammer.

In post 6491, Ankamius wrote:hi I'm here
what's the easiest way to scumside this game

Convince people that the idea of 9:4 with a hated roleblocker-traitor remaining scumteam in 4p is in any way possible and that you should vote for the fucking hated townie.

In post 6485, Creature wrote:

In post 6484, Ankamius wrote:

In post 6464, the worst wrote:Dannflor I'm your biggest fan

that is a tiny fan
but I appreciate the pun

VOTE: Mastina

on it!

In post 6495, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Mastina

on it!

No Ank, what you do is try to piss off RC as much as possible.

VOTE: RC

But that's immoral

In post 6496, Bitmap wrote: No Ank, what you do is try to piss off RC as much as possible.

uhh

higazer