Page 27 of 52
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:17 pm
by Pine
Let's go, Soda lynch ahoy.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:30 pm
by SleepyKrew
Pine, Grimm called someone out for being fluffy and useless but he's fluffy and useless.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:36 pm
by Pine
He's also been V/LA, asshat. I don't lurkerhunt until at least D2, because I've been there and gotten lynched on D1 as Town for being V/LA and having difficulty catching up. I find it nauseating that you predicate your entire case on that.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:37 pm
by SleepyKrew
He wasn't V/LA when this happened, fucktwat.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:30 pm
by xRECKONERx
Didn't SK just bitch at me like two pages ago for lurkerhunting when I threatened to vote Soda, but now he's essentially lurkerhunting Grimmjow?
Doesn't SK think Pine's scum, but now he's trying to talk to him and negotiate with him?
Vote: SleepyKrew
Flash wagon go
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:32 pm
by Pine
Unvote
Vote: SleepyKrew
Freaking finally.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:36 pm
by xRECKONERx
We have 48 hours for this to work. I'm getting cold feet on triangle due to the VT claim but SK's terribad tunneling on Pine is too much to ignore coupled with the complete dissonance in the past few pages
He's desperate for a mislynch and when he couldn't get Pine (who he supposedly thought was scum) lynched, he started aiming for Grimmjow, who is fairly inactive ATM.
This is a powerlynch if I've ever seen one.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:46 pm
by Pine
68 hours or so by my reckoning. We've got time. It irks me that you're better able to articulate the case on SKrew than I am, though I've been wrestling with him for most of the game.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:14 pm
by Uphill
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:Didn't SK just bitch at me like two pages ago for lurkerhunting
I looked all the way back to page 20 and didn't see this anywhere
quote it or I lynch you for lying
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:19 pm
by xRECKONERx
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Reck is defscum. No way town Reck would vote a lurker after tunneling on triangle so hard.
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:29 pm
by Nachomamma8
Hello, all. My plan is to catch up and take notes today, and start all of the good stuff tomorrow when I'll have a little more time.
I have to admit, I'm not quite sure what to make of Grimmjow's first interaction with Reck. Reck comes out and says that he's Grimm's boyfriend, and then he responds with a "yeah, and I don't really know what to make of Reck, yet". It comes out of nowhere and seems like nothing more than a response to Reck's mention of him. Otherwise, I see no reason why he should feel obligated to put out a null read on Reck on page 2.
I have no problem with Soda's late RVS post. I do, however, have a problem with his unvote. It's pretty clearly a way to placate his aggressors before the "wagon" becomes any bigger, but I could definitely see townSoda doing this based on past experienced. Net read suggests town.
@Pine's #81: You note that Soda is minimizing certain events. What obviously important events were Soda skipping over on page #4?
SK's "claim at L-3" post followed with a subsequent "oh whoops wrong game" post just reads wrong to me. SK wasn't in any other games with Soda at the time, and so there's not really a reason for the confusion to happen. Either way, it shows that SK really isn't that invested in the wagon he's pushing.
Triangle attacking a townread because of how sure it was while ignoring a scumread because of how sure it is scummy.
@implosion: And you might not recognize it because you have played with Reck/SDC before, but Reck's point of triangle ignoring his certitude is a valid one as well.
@implosion's #110: I got it, and I appreciated it.
Sleepy's posts on page 5 are in general pretty scummy. He has an overreaction to an accusation of his fluffposting, fluffposts, pushes poor pressure on Grimm, and gets mad at Grimm for ignoring a question... after ignoring a question.
And, in closing, Yates is probably town and I am sleepy as shit. Will be on full mode tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:29 am
by SleepyKrew
Excuse me for catching all the scum in one day. I'll be sure to only do one at a time from now on.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:40 am
by Yates
Again, I'm just posting to show that I am reading and active but will not be changing my vote off of Triangle.
I am rereading to see how I fell about Soda and SKrew.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:22 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Excuse me for catching all the scum in one day. I'll be sure to only do one at a time from now on.
You're not that good at this game, and you know you're not that good at this game.
So why the pretense?
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:35 am
by Force of Nature
How many explicit prod dodge posts from Yates is that?
Come on man. If you want to play the game, play the game.
What are your reads on players other than Triangle?
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:39 am
by Pine
@Nacho:
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:Well? Most 'keyword most' of the people haven't posted enough info to gather much info. The only things eventful that happened were Furcowgon, Grimmjow saying he would quit if Pine was scum, and now this wagon. None of the former 2 were scum-tells.
Soda was being dismissive of everything except Furc's claim, Grimm's claim, and the Soda wagon. Things of note that spring to mind are the discussion of FoN's attitude and Implosions mini-wall in 61.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:29 am
by implosion
skrew is a bad lynch.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:32 am
by Pine
Why?
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:32 pm
by SleepyKrew
↑ xRECKONERx wrote: ↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Excuse me for catching all the scum in one day. I'll be sure to only do one at a time from now on.
You're not that good at this game, and you know you're not that good at this game.
So why the pretense?
Because my play's been up recently and normally I'm not too confident in my reads, but I feel sooper confident right now. Expect my normal postgame apology if I'm wrong.
Now please, WHY is triangle scum?
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:33 pm
by xRECKONERx
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:I'm getting cold feet on triangle due to the VT claim
clearly I'm not too keen on triangle scum anymore so maybe you just aren't reading
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:37 pm
by SleepyKrew
I apologize. Why DID you think he was scum? Because a VT claim certainly shouldn't derail the level of certainty you were displaying ps vote pine
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:52 pm
by xRECKONERx
Triangle decided Grimm was scum for saying Pine looked obvtown and yet completely ignored me and FoN saying Furcolow looked like obvscum. The conviction wasn't real, a sign of scumminess.
However, triangle has apparently only completed two games, making me think the VT claim is something newbscum wouldn't do. I know in my first few games as scum, I was at the ready with a PR claim. It wasn't until much later in my scum career that I started whipping out VT claims.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:10 pm
by implosion
Because he's playing like he did the other two games that I played with him where he was town. I thought he was scummy too in one of them (I was admittedly third party, but i still thought he was scum for
most
of the game) but I think it's just the way he plays.
I'd lynch triangle over SK, but soda is still better.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:37 pm
by SleepyKrew
Oh God Execution. I was shit that game, even by my standards.
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:43 pm
by implosion
The same standards that led you to catch every scum day one this game?