Mafiascum.net

In post 81, Wake1 wrote:Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.

stop tutoring start scumhunting. at least i wasn't even pretending to be pro-town

i remember why i took a nap now ow

In post 645, Marquis wrote:really don't like ns's first two posts. not gonna say why

death

In post 646, Marquis wrote:ok so start is town first two pages and latest two pages so ok

Death

In post 647, Marquis wrote:or maybe i just really like him. idk who is he again

DEATH

In post 648, Marquis wrote:oooooh

somebody

is crumbing really hard

In post 649, Marquis wrote:

In post 36, bubbajack8 wrote:I'm quite disappointed in this Nacho wagon... Well more disappointed there's no counter wagon. ):

In post 39, notscience wrote:hm.

In post 43, Wake1 wrote:

In post 35, BROseidon wrote:

The thirteen men stand around

, eyeing each other down. There were clearly three among them who did not belong, but in the drunken stupor, none could recognize the OTP brothers. Thus, they sized each other up...

I don't think Sakura's a dude.

For the purposes of game flavor, everyone is a sweet bro.

In post 44, Wake1 wrote:

In post 31, Wake1 wrote:I remember Sakura shooting me.

In post 32, Sakura Hana wrote:

@Mod: V/LA Until Monday

She's guilty. She's plotting something. Take that gun away from her!

In post 49, Wake1 wrote:Come on guys, what're your reads?

I want my free nachos. Let's get him.

In post 50, Wake1 wrote:

In post 43, Wake1 wrote:

For the purposes of game flavor, everyone is a sweet bro.

Hellzorz, I think not.

I cannot bear to think of my sweet, sweet Sakura with a manly bro-stache.

O Death, I shall welcome thee!

In post 53, notscience wrote:VOTE: Wake

You're asking for reads without trying to stimulate conversation. That whole 49 looks forced.

In post 54, Wake1 wrote:Not at all. I just want reads, and free nachos.

If you want stimulating conversation, what sort of mental laxative do you have in mind?

We're only within the first 60 posts, so it's not as though we have a cornucopia of intel to pick apart right now.

In post 55, notscience wrote:You say you want reads but you aren't doing anything to question people, pressure them to get the reads.

In post 57, Wake1 wrote:HEY, people love nachos!

...what? If we keep him alive, he can provide us with... free nachos? Kinda like a chicken providing us with eggs, eh?

I suppose I could leave him alive as long as he provides us with the goods, then.

In post 58, notscience wrote:Why are you trying to keep us in RVS?

In post 59, Wake1 wrote:

In post 58, notscience wrote:Why are you trying to keep us in RVS?

This is my normal playstyle, guy.

Aloof, crazy,

or not crazy

, bored, etc.

In post 60, notscience wrote:Yeah, wake drew scum this game.

Lets get a wagon on this.

In post 61, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't think so.

I'm juggling four other games right now.

Gimme some time to contribute.

holy crap everything is scum

(scum: wake > notsci > bubba)

In post 650, Marquis wrote:

In post 81, Wake1 wrote:Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.

stop tutoring start scumhunting. at least i wasn't even pretending to be pro-town

In post 651, Marquis wrote:i remember why i took a nap now ow

In post 614, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 608, bubbajack8 wrote:But if he flips town, I'm going after Nachomama.

Why?

Who started the Mario wagon with no reason even though I asked?

In post 585, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Mario4

omfg this read is gold gold gold

I even asked.

In post 598, bubbajack8 wrote: What read?

In post 616, BoroPhil wrote: You are stating obvious things here or being deliberately obtuse. The hydra thing has already been explained. regina's vote was linked to your smileys, which I know were directed at me, we've discussed it.

1. I post replies as I read. As of current this is all I've read. When I post, I usually read through everything. And usually things that have been resolved I strikeout.

2. regina's vote, and my smileys had nothing in common. My smilies had nothing in common with being questioned either. at the beginning of the line it says "@Boro" Everything in that line is directed towards you.

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

Hey look we agree on something.

In post 620, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

There's 5 votes on him according to what SoS said, if that's what scum would do then at least 2 of those votes are guaranteed town, which makes it null. If anything im thinking scum would be more keen to be away from it.

Uh I said he had 5 votes. Why would scum pass up an easy chance at a ml under the guise of "Deadline"

In post 628, BoroPhil wrote:too scummy to be scum doesn't exist. if I'm scummy, vote for me. again start, this is just noise.

I agree too scummy to be scum doesn't make sense. But I think he voted you before, to which you gave him a goold ole pile of OMGUS. (If my memory's correct....)

In post 630, BoroPhil wrote:eh, has marquis replaced regina?

Marquis in 649 wrote: (scum: wake > notsci > bubba)

Are the quotes in this post indicative of why you find these players as scum? Or what? And what a post spam.

In post 614, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 608, bubbajack8 wrote:But if he flips town, I'm going after Nachomama.

Why?

Who started the Mario wagon with no reason even though I asked?

In post 585, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Mario4

omfg this read is gold gold gold

I even asked.

In post 598, bubbajack8 wrote: What read?

In post 616, BoroPhil wrote: You are stating obvious things here or being deliberately obtuse. The hydra thing has already been explained. regina's vote was linked to your smileys, which I know were directed at me, we've discussed it.

1. I post replies as I read. As of current this is all I've read. When I post, I usually read through everything. And usually things that have been resolved I strikeout.

2. regina's vote, and my smileys had nothing in common. My smilies had nothing in common with being questioned either. at the beginning of the line it says "@Boro" Everything in that line is directed towards you.

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

Hey look we agree on something.

In post 620, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

There's 5 votes on him according to what SoS said, if that's what scum would do then at least 2 of those votes are guaranteed town, which makes it null. If anything im thinking scum would be more keen to be away from it.

Uh I said he had 5 votes. Why would scum pass up an easy chance at a ml under the guise of "Deadline"

In post 628, BoroPhil wrote:too scummy to be scum doesn't exist. if I'm scummy, vote for me. again start, this is just noise.

I agree too scummy to be scum doesn't make sense. But I think he voted you before, to which you gave him a goold ole pile of OMGUS. (If my memory's correct....)

In post 630, BoroPhil wrote:eh, has marquis replaced regina?

Marquis in 649 wrote: (scum: wake > notsci > bubba)

Are the quotes in this post indicative of why you find these players as scum? Or what? And what a post spam.

In post 614, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 608, bubbajack8 wrote:But if he flips town, I'm going after Nachomama.

Why?

Who started the Mario wagon with no reason even though I asked?

In post 585, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Mario4

omfg this read is gold gold gold

I even asked.

In post 598, bubbajack8 wrote: What read?

In post 616, BoroPhil wrote: You are stating obvious things here or being deliberately obtuse. The hydra thing has already been explained. regina's vote was linked to your smileys, which I know were directed at me, we've discussed it.

1. I post replies as I read. As of current this is all I've read. When I post, I usually read through everything. And usually things that have been resolved I strikeout.

2. regina's vote, and my smileys had nothing in common. My smilies had nothing in common with being questioned either. at the beginning of the line it says "@Boro" Everything in that line is directed towards you.

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

Hey look we agree on something.

In post 620, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.

There's 5 votes on him according to what SoS said, if that's what scum would do then at least 2 of those votes are guaranteed town, which makes it null. If anything im thinking scum would be more keen to be away from it.

Uh I said he had 5 votes. Why would scum pass up an easy chance at a ml under the guise of "Deadline"

In post 628, BoroPhil wrote:too scummy to be scum doesn't exist. if I'm scummy, vote for me. again start, this is just noise.

I agree too scummy to be scum doesn't make sense. But I think he voted you before, to which you gave him a goold ole pile of OMGUS. (If my memory's correct....)

In post 630, BoroPhil wrote:eh, has marquis replaced regina?

Marquis in 649 wrote: (scum: wake > notsci > bubba)

Are the quotes in this post indicative of why you find these players as scum? Or what? And what a post spam.

In post 130, REGINA+ wrote:

In post 100, bubbajack8 wrote:

In post 92, Nachomamma8 wrote:oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm voting

In post 94, notscience wrote: You're voting Wake and he has a scum role pm and needs to die

In post 98, Ms Marangal wrote:Nacho isn't even voting anyone.

Just went to check. MM is correct. Which would explain how Nacho "forgot who he was voting". the question is why is notscience pushing Wake? And saying that Nacho is voting him when he's not.

@Boro: You want to give reasons besides just saying it's "interesting?" -_-

I don't quite like this post at all

UNVOTE:
VOTE: bubbajack8

this vote is surely linked to your smileys?

having said that, I quite like your last post.

and I think you emphasise my point on startfromtheheart. he did vote for me earlier, but there was no sound reasoning behind it and now he flipflops around. why not stick on me if he is so sure?

In post 657, BoroPhil wrote:and I think you emphasise my point on startfromtheheart. he did vote for me earlier, but there was no sound reasoning behind it and now he flipflops around. why not stick on me if he is so sure?

Agree. As to the smileys. You'd have to ask Marquis. I thought you were saying my reaction to being questioned was to respond with smileys.

lol post spam

i initially found bj scummy just for the post in general. didn't like the tone and how it sounded like it was hinting at a scumread rather than actually being outright with it, like trying to subtly sway opinion without committing to it.

i didn't really focus on the smileys but yes they look forced in hindsight

rereading a few early pages (which were filled with player insistence on rvs btw) slightly reinforced that read and i think i'm seeing something different from ns's town meta. like... he's thinking too hard or something and not being defensive enough

as for wake i can't tell if he was being scummy on purpose as a part of an extended rvs but it annoys me how it's going to be hard to hold him accountable for that later on

In post 628, BoroPhil wrote:too scummy to be scum doesn't exist. if I'm scummy, vote for me. again start, this is just noise.

Yes, it does.

Do you really not understand how you OMGUS'd me and then didn't explain? You called my vote a lazy vote, and then you told us "you can lynch me for being lazy if you want"

also how was there no sound reasoning behind my vote on you? I voted you after you blatantly asked us to end the day quickly by lynching Bubba. Then you voted someone who was making noise (notscience), and right afterwards asked us if we think most of the time people being this active/noisy are town... (paraphrase)

EBWOP: Boro, what is the town motivation behind asking us to end the day quickly by lynching Bubba??

i /think/ start's flipflopping is town and really that's my only townread atm

pedit start is also right about too much posturing and pseudophilosophy

i /think/ start's flipflopping is town and really that's my only townread atm

pedit start is also right about too much posturing and pseudophilosophy

tbqh there was a bit of humour behind my omgus. Surely stating it was an omgus at that stage makes that apparent?

I've been disinterested for most of this day, I'm not alone in that. It's been very quiet, I was also amazed that the deadline was now.

Your vote on me was basically based on 3 random statements with zero analysis.

I wanted bubba lynched. so why not a quick one?

notscience was acting anti-town. so why not scum, why not a lynch?

and the third one was a genuine question - why would you have a problem with that exactly?

you are basically just trying to sound town

If I think bubba is scum, it doesn't really matter whether the day ends after 1 hour or 1 month. not wanting a quick lynch is a MASSIVE cliche round here. a good lynch is a good lynch, regardless of the time it takes

and anyone spouting cliches should be placed on a massive SCUMwatch

15 hours left

VOTE: notscience

get it in

In post 664, BoroPhil wrote:I wanted bubba lynched. so why not a quick one?

lol

In post 664, BoroPhil wrote:tbqh there was a bit of humour behind my omgus. Surely stating it was an omgus at that stage makes that apparent?

You parked that OMGUS for days, and an OMGUS is an OMGUS is an OMGUS

In post 664, BoroPhil wrote:It's been very quiet

are you kidding because there was a huge ugly fight between ETL and ns for a good part of this day phase...

I think an omgus stated as an omgus makes it a negative omgus multiplied by a negative omgus equals a nonomgus

it was really quiet up until then, I will assume you realised I meant that and just wanted clarification rather than trying to misrep me

the more i look at it the more unappealing the mario lynch looks

let's vote notscience

oh lol SoS is wake

~mixed feelings~

In post 665, BoroPhil wrote:

If I think bubba is scum, it doesn't really matter whether the day ends after 1 hour or 1 month.

not wanting a quick lynch is a MASSIVE cliche round here.

a good lynch is a good lynch, regardless of the time it takes

In post 666, BoroPhil wrote:and anyone spouting cliches should be placed on a massive SCUMwatch

this feels incredibly wrong, that's where it's at man. I don't even know where to start

I have done some of the dumbest impulsive quickhammers, or early votes in LYLO, more times than I wanna admit to people. Kicked myself for that. hammered nacho early on on page 3, he flipped town, no info, nothing.

and it has screwed the town over, big-time, more often than not. The list goes on

In post 669, BoroPhil wrote:I think an omgus stated as an omgus makes it a negative omgus multiplied by a negative omgus equals a nonomgus

I'm going to assume you aren't being serious and you're pulling my leg