Newbie 1687 (Game Over)


Forum rules
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #650 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:24 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

notachipmunk wrote:I wanna see what Reubus thinks atm, he is usually quite talkative...well not like Frogleveltalkative but still up there.

Soooo here's something: Drixx why the vote on me I am curious?


I want to hear this too
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #651 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:26 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Drixx wrote:I know it's completely crazy. I always note the game number if I get something that's not vanilla, and I wrote 1-shot BP for Newbie 1686 by mistake (that game is now over). So when the question arose during the day phase yesterday, it slipped my mind. It wasn't until I won 1686 and went to close out my notes for that game that I saw I had noted 1-shot BP there ... but I was a mafia goon in 1686 and that obviously couldn't be correct, so I went and looked and sure enough ... I'm the missing 1-shot BP.

I'm super duper embarrassed. I've never mixed up my notes or had any issue with keeping games separate. FrogSC2 is probably blowing his top in the dead thread ripping me to shreds right now.


Image

For the time being...

VOTE: Drixx
User avatar
Drixx
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6899
Joined: December 17, 2014

Post Post #652 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:39 pm

Post by Drixx »

Reubus Swagrid wrote:Just noting the only person who isn't confirmed town on the Phantom lynch is Drixx


The only confirmed town is Rufus. Nobody else is confirmed because I'm 1-shot BP which means the scum roleblocker knew about the Jailkeeper due to the blurt by Rufus, and therefore nobody is clear. Your attempt to claim that anyone alive other than Rufus is conftown is troubling, to say the least.
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!
User avatar
Drixx
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6899
Joined: December 17, 2014

Post Post #653 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 2:40 pm

Post by Drixx »

Reubus Swagrid wrote:
Drixx wrote:I know it's completely crazy. I always note the game number if I get something that's not vanilla, and I wrote 1-shot BP for Newbie 1686 by mistake (that game is now over). So when the question arose during the day phase yesterday, it slipped my mind. It wasn't until I won 1686 and went to close out my notes for that game that I saw I had noted 1-shot BP there ... but I was a mafia goon in 1686 and that obviously couldn't be correct, so I went and looked and sure enough ... I'm the missing 1-shot BP.

I'm super duper embarrassed. I've never mixed up my notes or had any issue with keeping games separate. FrogSC2 is probably blowing his top in the dead thread ripping me to shreds right now.


Image

For the time being...

VOTE: Drixx


I would appreciate it if you didn't mock me for making a mistake. Thanks.
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!
User avatar
kagesong
kagesong
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kagesong
Goon
Goon
Posts: 728
Joined: February 16, 2016

Post Post #654 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:13 pm

Post by kagesong »

notachipmunk wrote:

Kage: D1 I got a bad vibe off your posts mostly the focus on nightkills and discussion of scum strategy. The late pam vote didn't count and may have been an attempt to try to redeem yourself after it had happened - or possibly happened since the Frog vote would be the determining factor. D2 the logic was a bit odd. I was a little bit ok with the Frog isn't auto-town thing, but I also thought that maybe it was due to not claiming as I thought claiming wasn't always a good idea, but I suppose I was wrong on that. But Frog not being town and also not being a roleblocker required Rufus to either not be JK or lying about who he jailed - which would be a very anti-town thing to do if he was town, which at that point seemed like the only possibility due to lack of counterclaim on JK (since a counterclaim would mean a town win - one of them would HAVE to be scum and it would very untown to not claim JK there). On the plus side you are very much unafraid to put out opposing thoughts.

Like I said, anything that is off let me know what and why. This is pretty much just my thought process atm and not a super in-depth analysis.


For anyone that uses my late vote as lynch evidence, it's ok, I'll feel better once you realize my stuff was really stolen. So, I forgive you.
User avatar
notachipmunk
notachipmunk
she
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
notachipmunk
she
Goon
Goon
Posts: 204
Joined: June 21, 2015
Pronoun: she

Post Post #655 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Post by notachipmunk »

kagesong wrote:
notachipmunk wrote:

Kage: D1 I got a bad vibe off your posts mostly the focus on nightkills and discussion of scum strategy. The late pam vote didn't count and may have been an attempt to try to redeem yourself after it had happened - or possibly happened since the Frog vote would be the determining factor. D2 the logic was a bit odd. I was a little bit ok with the Frog isn't auto-town thing, but I also thought that maybe it was due to not claiming as I thought claiming wasn't always a good idea, but I suppose I was wrong on that. But Frog not being town and also not being a roleblocker required Rufus to either not be JK or lying about who he jailed - which would be a very anti-town thing to do if he was town, which at that point seemed like the only possibility due to lack of counterclaim on JK (since a counterclaim would mean a town win - one of them would HAVE to be scum and it would very untown to not claim JK there). On the plus side you are very much unafraid to put out opposing thoughts.

Like I said, anything that is off let me know what and why. This is pretty much just my thought process atm and not a super in-depth analysis.


For anyone that uses my late vote as lynch evidence, it's ok, I'll feel better once you realize my stuff was really stolen. So, I forgive you.


It's impossible to tell what is true and what is not for things like this, so sorry if that did happen to you. =(
It's unfortunate timing, though up till then your votes were for Rufus, and then Rufus again. (not including the RVS vote on kirroha)
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #656 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:28 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Drixx wrote:
Reubus Swagrid wrote:Just noting the only person who isn't confirmed town on the Phantom lynch is Drixx


The only confirmed town is Rufus. Nobody else is confirmed because I'm 1-shot BP which means the scum roleblocker knew about the Jailkeeper due to the blurt by Rufus, and therefore nobody is clear. Your attempt to claim that anyone alive other than Rufus is conftown is troubling, to say the least.


Sorry I self confirmed myself in that post
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #657 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:29 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Drixx wrote:
Reubus Swagrid wrote:
Drixx wrote:I know it's completely crazy. I always note the game number if I get something that's not vanilla, and I wrote 1-shot BP for Newbie 1686 by mistake (that game is now over). So when the question arose during the day phase yesterday, it slipped my mind. It wasn't until I won 1686 and went to close out my notes for that game that I saw I had noted 1-shot BP there ... but I was a mafia goon in 1686 and that obviously couldn't be correct, so I went and looked and sure enough ... I'm the missing 1-shot BP.

I'm super duper embarrassed. I've never mixed up my notes or had any issue with keeping games separate. FrogSC2 is probably blowing his top in the dead thread ripping me to shreds right now.


Image

For the time being...

VOTE: Drixx


I would appreciate it if you didn't mock me for making a mistake. Thanks.


I'm not mocking you Drixx, I just find it very suprising
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #658 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:30 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

*surprising

I need more sleep
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #659 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:33 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Reubus Swagrid wrote:
kagesong wrote:
Rufus Delorian wrote:We kinda already pursued the Frog = Scum line of thinking. Without a Bulletproof Townie, it doesn't work out.

Reubus did the Rufus = Scum line of thinking but without any other power role claim, it doesn't work out.

We're currently on PhantomCobalt = Scum with a hint of Kagesong = scum in the mix.

Drixx, Reubus & Notachipmunk haven't had much suspicion pointed at them but they all voted on a scum lynch D1, if you can think of any reason to suspect one of them more than PhantomCobalt...we've got time I guess.

Personally I'd rather string up PhantomCobalt and be done with it.


Also, I read 'That other guy' as Kagesong.

kagesong wrote:For everyone who mentioned me as a no show. I had a personal emergency, which included my laptop getting stolen and hours with cops. I honestly thought it was still monday. IF THE MOD WILL HONOR IT my official vote is VOTE: literallypam

If not, I apologize for my absence and hope you all understand.


SO PLEASE QUIT EXCLUDING ME FROM THE PAM VOTE.


So late tho. Legit the credibility this late a vote gives is next to nothing


kagesong wrote:
notachipmunk wrote:

Kage: D1 I got a bad vibe off your posts mostly the focus on nightkills and discussion of scum strategy. The late pam vote didn't count and may have been an attempt to try to redeem yourself after it had happened - or possibly happened since the Frog vote would be the determining factor. D2 the logic was a bit odd. I was a little bit ok with the Frog isn't auto-town thing, but I also thought that maybe it was due to not claiming as I thought claiming wasn't always a good idea, but I suppose I was wrong on that. But Frog not being town and also not being a roleblocker required Rufus to either not be JK or lying about who he jailed - which would be a very anti-town thing to do if he was town, which at that point seemed like the only possibility due to lack of counterclaim on JK (since a counterclaim would mean a town win - one of them would HAVE to be scum and it would very untown to not claim JK there). On the plus side you are very much unafraid to put out opposing thoughts.

Like I said, anything that is off let me know what and why. This is pretty much just my thought process atm and not a super in-depth analysis.


For anyone that uses my late vote as lynch evidence, it's ok, I'll feel better once you realize my stuff was really stolen. So, I forgive you.


I really don't think your vote is indicative of alignment, anyone could've hopped on late so it's barely worth classing as evidence in cases for and against
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #660 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:39 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Drixx wrote:You all realize I could have just "confessed" I was the 1-shot and said I hoped that I would draw night fire since the scum must know I exist, instead of telling you the truth that I mixed up games and literally didn't realize until Phantom was lynched and the thread was locked, right? If I were scum and this was a fake claim, it would not be "Oops I forgot" but "Damn ... I wish I had successfully drawn fire" and it probably wouldn't have happened today right at the day start.

Look at day one and tell me why I would have been the architect of my partner's demise when given every opportunity to go get a mislynch somewhere instead, if I were scum.

This isn't even difficult at all. I would have to be holding the most gigantic idiot ball ever made to be scum and have acted as I have.

VOTE: notachipmunk


With this in mind

UNVOTE: Drixx
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #661 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 4:42 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Could you tell me why you're convinced its more likely chipmunk than kage?
User avatar
Drixx
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6899
Joined: December 17, 2014

Post Post #662 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:18 pm

Post by Drixx »

Reubus Swagrid wrote:Could you tell me why you're convinced its more likely chipmunk than kage?


I compared the lynch pool in ISO together. The confirmed are me and Rufus. That leaves You, Kage and Notachipmunk. Out of the three of you, notachipmunk's ISO looks more like a fabrication to me, while you are low on content but it seems to be legitimately involved with the game, and I can't find anything that smells wrong about Kage. I can do a spoiler wall on each of you tomorrow if you like. I need to finish some writing that is overdue and get it submitted. It's the only reason I'm up so late.

Thanks for thinking through things. I totally get the shock that I would so royally screw up. I really wish I hadn't. We could have put together a much better plan had town known what scum knew.

I still think we have this. We know it wasn't the replacements paired with pam, because they've been killed. Evaluating what they said and who they threatened or cleared will be helpful. Frog and I had a bit of a difference of opinion obviously and there was some friction. I'm wondering if those two (who are obviously friends prior to here) were killed to put me in a frame?

Anyway ... we need significant content from You, Kage and Chipmunk today so that Rufus and I can read you now and read you earlier and see if we can finish the game today.
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!
User avatar
kagesong
kagesong
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kagesong
Goon
Goon
Posts: 728
Joined: February 16, 2016

Post Post #663 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:57 pm

Post by kagesong »

Drixx wrote:
Reubus Swagrid wrote:Could you tell me why you're convinced its more likely chipmunk than kage?


I compared the lynch pool in ISO together. The confirmed are me and Rufus. That leaves You, Kage and Notachipmunk. Out of the three of you, notachipmunk's ISO looks more like a fabrication to me, while you are low on content but it seems to be legitimately involved with the game, and I can't find anything that smells wrong about Kage. I can do a spoiler wall on each of you tomorrow if you like. I need to finish some writing that is overdue and get it submitted. It's the only reason I'm up so late.

Thanks for thinking through things. I totally get the shock that I would so royally screw up. I really wish I hadn't. We could have put together a much better plan had town known what scum knew.

I still think we have this. We know it wasn't the replacements paired with pam, because they've been killed. Evaluating what they said and who they threatened or cleared will be helpful. Frog and I had a bit of a difference of opinion obviously and there was some friction. I'm wondering if those two (who are obviously friends prior to here) were killed to put me in a frame?

Anyway ... we need significant content from You, Kage and Chipmunk today so that Rufus and I can read you now and read you earlier and see if we can finish the game today.


I don't know about adding significant content. But your point is both true and troubling. If you are not scum, targeting the people you disliked would be ideal. The same target could cause FOS on me however. As far as you conftown, that is assuming that you are indeed 1SBP. If there's a RB no one clear. The rest gets into some obvious WIFOM that is probably going through everyone's head. What it comes down to, is how can we prove you are BP without scum targeting you?
User avatar
Zaicon
Zaicon
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zaicon
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2716
Joined: September 1, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:04 am

Post by Zaicon »

Vote Count 3.1


kagesong (1):
Rufus Delorian
notachipmunk (1):
Drixx

No Vote (3):
kagesong, notachipmunk, Reubus Swagrid

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch!

Deadline is Monday, April 4, 2016 at 8:00 AM CDT, which is in (expired on 2016-04-04 08:00:00).
User avatar
notachipmunk
notachipmunk
she
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
notachipmunk
she
Goon
Goon
Posts: 204
Joined: June 21, 2015
Pronoun: she

Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:41 am

Post by notachipmunk »

@Drixx - yeah if you can do a spoiler wall thing at some point that would be cool, since I'm not sure what you mean

@Kage - The only way I can think to confirm Drixx is BP is to lynch him pretty much, and that would be bad idea if it turned out he wasn't lying because then it's a wasted lynch. If he is lying, then great, he is scum. I don't think there is a way to confirm it at this point, which is also why it would be pretty safe to fakeclaim it.
User avatar
kagesong
kagesong
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kagesong
Goon
Goon
Posts: 728
Joined: February 16, 2016

Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:44 am

Post by kagesong »

notachipmunk wrote:@Drixx - yeah if you can do a spoiler wall thing at some point that would be cool, since I'm not sure what you mean

@Kage - The only way I can think to confirm Drixx is BP is to lynch him pretty much, and that would be bad idea if it turned out he wasn't lying because then it's a wasted lynch. If he is lying, then great, he is scum. I don't think there is a way to confirm it at this point, which is also why it would be pretty safe to fakeclaim it.


precisely
User avatar
Drixx
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6899
Joined: December 17, 2014

Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:47 am

Post by Drixx »

Seriously? You guys can clear me using logic alone.

1.) If I were scum, I would not have claimed BP without any pressure on me, nor would it have been claimed anywhere near the way I did. People actually outright said in BOLD for the BP not to claim and hope to draw night fire. I could have said "I hoped the scum would shoot me, but they didn't and I feel like it's time to claim so the town knows nobody is clear" or some blather like that. Instead I told you guys the honest truth of what happened. It's embarrassing and it doesn't do anything at all to help a scum agenda; it in fact brings negative attention to me. It makes no logical sense to take this approach when a much nicer and elegant story was available to me... unless it's the truth. It's the truth.

2.) If I were scum, that would mean that I went after my partner on day one relentlessly, even when I was urged to look elsewhere and even when FrogSC2 was slinging insults at me because I stuck to my guns and said "I find one scum, and I make sure it dies; THEN I worry about the partner." (paraphrased obviously). I not only had the opportunity to go to a wagon on someone else, I was being actively insulted that I wasn't doing so. Please explain to me what rational motive could possibly lead me to do that on day one, if I were scum.

When you take just those two points together, it becomes obvious that I'm not scum. The two of you avoiding looking at context makes it seem likely that one of you is scum and the other is erm ... bad at logic.
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!
User avatar
notachipmunk
notachipmunk
she
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
notachipmunk
she
Goon
Goon
Posts: 204
Joined: June 21, 2015
Pronoun: she

Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:14 am

Post by notachipmunk »

Neither of us is voting for you right now or straight up saying YOU ARE SCUM. I think it is just silly to completely disregard it.

I get that with the 2 points you mentioned it is less likely, but that doesn't make it impossible - the only 100% logical clear is Rufus.
Are you saying that that combination of things
never
happens and that scum
always
follow a series of planned steps that make sense to everyone else?
If so, then kage makes logical sense to me. But I am not a fan of jumping to conclusions that quickly.
User avatar
kagesong
kagesong
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kagesong
Goon
Goon
Posts: 728
Joined: February 16, 2016

Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:55 am

Post by kagesong »

Drixx wrote:Seriously? You guys can clear me using logic alone.

1.) If I were scum, I would not have claimed BP without any pressure on me, nor would it have been claimed anywhere near the way I did. People actually outright said in BOLD for the BP not to claim and hope to draw night fire. I could have said "I hoped the scum would shoot me, but they didn't and I feel like it's time to claim so the town knows nobody is clear" or some blather like that. Instead I told you guys the honest truth of what happened. It's embarrassing and it doesn't do anything at all to help a scum agenda; it in fact brings negative attention to me. It makes no logical sense to take this approach when a much nicer and elegant story was available to me... unless it's the truth. It's the truth.

2.) If I were scum, that would mean that I went after my partner on day one relentlessly, even when I was urged to look elsewhere and even when FrogSC2 was slinging insults at me because I stuck to my guns and said "I find one scum, and I make sure it dies; THEN I worry about the partner." (paraphrased obviously). I not only had the opportunity to go to a wagon on someone else, I was being actively insulted that I wasn't doing so. Please explain to me what rational motive could possibly lead me to do that on day one, if I were scum.

When you take just those two points together, it becomes obvious that I'm not scum. The two of you avoiding looking at context makes it seem likely that one of you is scum and the other is erm ... bad at logic.

I'm just saying that there are reasons it could make you seem more and less suspicious. It depends on how much wine there is.
User avatar
Rufus Delorian
Rufus Delorian
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rufus Delorian
Townie
Townie
Posts: 77
Joined: February 18, 2016

Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:23 am

Post by Rufus Delorian »

Drixx wrote:The deadline is the deadline and FroGSC2 caused a no lynch, and I believe it's intentional. I believe he's scum and have strong reasons for that belief. He called out what I have reason to believe was a VT attempting to draw fire by claiming. If I'm dead in the morning you will see my role and it will make sense. If I'm know, I'll say more.


It's a bit of an old post but I'm quoting it here because I was sure Drixx was the bulletproof after it, which was why I was initially reluctant to accept Frog as cleared and kept asking the BP to step forwards.

Also, if there isn't a Roleblocker, I should have been NKd. If there is, it's useful to keep me around as long as BP doesn't claim because it could lead to scum getting cleared...such as if I "jailed" scum last night.

@Kagesong, on D2 you kept arguing that Frog was wrong & not cleared because there could be a Roleblocker, today Drixx has confirmed that there is one but you're not convinced, what changed?
User avatar
Drixx
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Drixx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6899
Joined: December 17, 2014

Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:55 am

Post by Drixx »

At the time of post #321 I did believe Frog was potentially scum, and I thought you had claimed to draw fire Rufus. I was trying to save you and draw fire myself by implying that I knew you couldn't actually be jailkeeper (which would make scum fear I could be cop or tracker and kill me). I legit thought I was a VT and was going for utility. In my mind, me showing up dead as a VT the next morning would have made it obvious to people that I was trying to save you.

Good question for Kagesong.
Get to know a Drixx - Recently Updated!
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:55 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Drixx what do you think of Frogs analysis of Kagesong?
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reubus Swagrid
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 12, 2015
Location: Australia

Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:58 pm

Post by Reubus Swagrid »

Prior to Phantoms Derp Lynch that is
User avatar
kagesong
kagesong
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kagesong
Goon
Goon
Posts: 728
Joined: February 16, 2016

Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:20 pm

Post by kagesong »

Rufus Delorian wrote:
Drixx wrote:The deadline is the deadline and FroGSC2 caused a no lynch, and I believe it's intentional. I believe he's scum and have strong reasons for that belief. He called out what I have reason to believe was a VT attempting to draw fire by claiming. If I'm dead in the morning you will see my role and it will make sense. If I'm know, I'll say more.


It's a bit of an old post but I'm quoting it here because I was sure Drixx was the bulletproof after it, which was why I was initially reluctant to accept Frog as cleared and kept asking the BP to step forwards.

Also, if there isn't a Roleblocker, I should have been NKd. If there is, it's useful to keep me around as long as BP doesn't claim because it could lead to scum getting cleared...such as if I "jailed" scum last night.

@Kagesong, on D2 you kept arguing that Frog was wrong & not cleared because there could be a Roleblocker, today Drixx has confirmed that there is one but you're not convinced, what changed?


He claimed BP day 3. I see no reason to wait that long. By the way, who did you jail last night?
Locked