Mafiascum.net

Shit.

In post 202, TwoFace wrote:Oh yeah that's bad. The over explanation about scum being can be lynch baity makes it bad. Scum can't be lynch bait

This needs a flip. Should I vote?

Heads

VOTE: copper

He's referring to this. Which is wrong.

@Wobuffet

In post 651, Drone wrote:He's referring to this. Which is wrong.

yes that's one of the reasons. I think mort later asked me about it and we had a discussion on why I found it scummy. You can disagree with me and say it's wrong, but I don't think it is.

add in the fact that all he has basically done is OMGUS people and he lied about TB's activity

none of that looks like town to me.

In post 646, TwoFace wrote:

In post 644, Drone wrote:You can, ISO'ing yourself?

no I can't

In post 637, TwoFace wrote:I'm on a mobile device

In post 642, TwoFace wrote:I'm certainly not going to go out of my way to help out the person I'm trying to lynch.

I'm on a mobile device myself. All the time.
It's not helping, it's clarifying yourself.

Personally, I don't buy the vig claim too much, if he is indeed claiming it. I'm fine with letting him live until day 2 though. Although that means I'm dead tonight.

It's you or me.

That claim puzzles me.

TwoFace, please confirm, are you claiming vig?

why do I need to clarify myself to my scum read though? I don't care what my scum read thinks of me, tbh i don't care what anyone thinks of me. I just care about lynching my scum reads and that is all anyone should care about.

In post 653, TwoFace wrote:

In post 651, Drone wrote:He's referring to this. Which is wrong.

yes that's one of the reasons. I think mort later asked me about it and we had a discussion on why I found it scummy. You can disagree with me and say it's wrong, but I don't think it is.

add in the fact that all he has basically done is OMGUS people and he lied about TB's activity

none of that looks like town to me.

Look through all of copper's posts on site, and search for the word "lynchbait". You might not agree with his position on it, but it's consistent with what he's posted elsewhere.

And I don't think he lied about TB's activity, the game-avoiding he was referring to seemed to be about how TB had posted elsewhere recently but not in this game.

Granted, I don't like Wobbuffet's entrance here much at all, so maybe they're scum. But those points you keep pushing aren't really convincing.

In post 656, Human Sequencer wrote:It's you or me.

That claim puzzles me.

TwoFace, please confirm, are you claiming vig?

role fishing noted

Are you fucking joking me?

You don't have to claim, but considering you'll be lynched if you don't, it might be a good idea...

In post 658, ChaosOmega wrote:Look through all of copper's posts on site, and search for the word "lynchbait". You might not agree with his position on it, but it's consistent with what he's posted elsewhere.

And I don't think he lied about TB's activity, the game-avoiding he was referring to seemed to be about how TB had posted elsewhere recently but not in this game.

Granted, I don't like Wobbuffet's entrance here much at all, so maybe they're scum. But those points you keep pushing aren't really convincing.

why is everyone hung up on the word lynchbait. that definition is like the least of the things I am scum reading him for.

TB made 14 posts in 1 day before Copper accused him of game avoiding. He made 5 the day before. The game had only been open 2 days, so in those 2 days he made 19 posts and one of them had a list of reads.

THAT IS NOT GAME AVOIDING.

He did lie about TB's activity, 100% bold face blatnat lie.

Twoface, if I was scum, I wouldn't even be considering nightkilling you as a vig. I'd be doing all I could to keep you in the game because you would be the WORST VIG EVER.

Fuck his activity in this game, look at all of TB's posts and see where he had most recently posted and the lag time from this game to anywhere else. It's not about activity, he explicitly said game-avoiding.

Copper didn't throw votes that much actually.
Creeps, justified.
Mort, not as OMGUS as your everyday OMGUS. it's a good vote the phase we were in.
And TB, with a very justified claim on TB's activity. I'll say it again, not the first time he creates this impression.

In post 657, TwoFace wrote:why do I need to clarify myself to my scum read though? I don't care what my scum read thinks of me, tbh i don't care what anyone thinks of me. I just care about lynching my scum reads and that is all anyone should care about.

It's a group game. Mental game. You need to care what others think of you.
You're in the wrong game mate.

In post 661, DeathByWobbuffet wrote:You don't have to claim, but considering you'll be lynched if you don't, it might be a good idea...

do I look like I care if I am lynched or not? Town wants to be fucking stupid and mislynch me while I am trying to lynch scum, I don't really give a shit.

I have asked to be given a stay until day 2, if town chooses no to, that's their fault not mine.

I am not claiming because I shouldn't have to. I shouldn't be policy lynched for trying to lynch my scum reads.

Naomi, I need more tea.

Yeah, you should be policy lynched for being a toxic distraction to the game.

In post 643, TwoFace wrote:

In post 641, Naomi-Tan wrote:This would be fine by TF said he has no intentions of replacing out :s and is still got all the focus..

Why should I? The people I'm scum reading are insulting me. Why would I let them win when I can just get rid of them and show they were scum all along. It's more enjoyable that way

Because you refuse to explain your reads to people replacing in and build a negative environment where multiple players have replaced out because of you. Your kinda ruining this game.

In post 653, TwoFace wrote:

In post 651, Drone wrote:He's referring to this. Which is wrong.

yes that's one of the reasons. I think mort later asked me about it and we had a discussion on why I found it scummy. You can disagree with me and say it's wrong, but I don't think it is.

add in the fact that all he has basically done is OMGUS people and he lied about TB's activity

none of that looks like town to me.

hehehe this guy mentioned OMGUS XD

In post 665, Drone wrote:It's a group game. Mental game. You need to care what others think of you

well I don't care. nobody should care what people think of them really.

All I care about is finding scum and getting them lynched. That is what all townies should care about.

The only people who need to care what people think of them are scum. Scum need people to think they are town. I let my actions speak for themselves. My actions show me looking for scum and pushing on my scum reads. If people want to lynch me because I didn't appreciate being called a VI so be it. That's the dumbest reason to lynch and everyone who is on it who is town is actively playing against their win condition by doing so.

In post 668, ChaosOmega wrote:Yeah, you should be policy lynched for being a toxic distraction to the game.

how am I distracting the game really? I am trying to lynch scum. I am pointing out scum lying and doing suspicious things.

that's actually called playing the game

So what do you think is more scummy? Lynching someone because you personally believe they're scum after they just happened to lynch you? Or lynching someone and refusing to give reasons for doing so? Because personally, I think the latter.