If I was scum I wouldn't be sitting on Dunn the whole fucking time. I would have joined any of my CWs.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:42 am
by borkjerfkin
i think i'm going back into retirement after this game
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:51 am
by Foxbird
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:21 am
by Syryana
@Mod: you have 2 entries for Persivul in your vc
In other news I feel like I'm sitting in a corner blowing raspberries for all the good I'm doing here. I'm going to throw the contents of my brain at a wall and see what you lot make of it.
UNVOTE: for now.
Let's consolidate some shit here. People that aren't getting lynched today because of role reasons (not necessarily the only reason but etc):
Dunn - voted Seiko which will do good things tomorrow
S_S - claimed Medivh: bodyguard
Persivul - Will become obviously town tomorrow
Charloux - wants to be lynched because his ability is pro-town (not quite the same under the premise I started this list for but w/e)
So that leaves me, bork, Seiko, TOB, Aj. I'm not voting bork or Seiko. Aj I rather thought redeemed himself somewhat in the last few pages. That leaves TOB.
That said, I'm not supremely confident in a TOB lynch. I like the Raven head of it anyways. (I really should ISO just that head later, note to self)
That list leaves me with either an {Aj, TOB} scumteam (meeeeh), or at least one of the people in the role list is lying. If I had to pick a person in the list it'd probably be Persivul because the only reason I'm not voting him is the softclaim.
Seiko, bork, where are your heads at?
Fixed the VC.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:31 am
by Persivul
In post 578, Charloux wrote:Btw if you are not certain who to lynch, i suggest you lynch me. I'm useless right now, so the only thing i can do is help you with my ability that activates when i get lynched.
Why don't we just do this?
VOTE: Charloux
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:33 am
by Aj The Epic
Why take a conceding lynch that literally allows scum to get away free with a vote?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:39 am
by Persivul
Uh, because he said it will activate a power that benefits town...?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:41 am
by Aj The Epic
I'll take real information from a lynch over a town oneshot role any day.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:49 am
by Persivul
What if it makes a scum secretly hated tomorrow? That would be pretty useful.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:52 am
by Aj The Epic
What if it does nothing?
No cop-outs.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:55 am
by borkjerfkin
Ok I'm getting weirded out
In post 605, Persivul wrote:My role pretty much lets me prove I'm town tomorrow, so if you're town and lynch me, don't say I didn't warn you.
"Pretty much lets you prove" or "lets you prove"
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:57 am
by Dunnstral
In post 653, Syryana wrote:Dunn - voted Seiko which will do good things tomorrow
Actually, I've made it clear that you shouldn't really be considerate of my role when deciding to lynch me; with that being said, you still shouldn't lynch me just because shadow said so
Are we really getting off of shadow because he claimed? What if it's a fakeclaim? What if it was a provided fakeclaim?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:57 am
by borkjerfkin
basically i'm asking: it lets you prove you're town tomorrow, is it anti-town to talk about it now?
If you really think it is then so be it, but I want that on record in triplicate right now.