In post 648, Lapsa wrote:and you are scum. there is no inconsistency in that
it's this scrutiny of pointless bullshit that gives you away
scum has to fabricate stuff so they do
i don't know how you haven't realized the obvious fact that you and i simply play the game differently. like, it's obvious that you and transcend are players who don't focus a lot on explanations and that i am. i'm not scrutinizing "pointless bullshit", i'm literally just trying to talk to you about your read on me. talking things through helps you refine a read and should allow you to see if there are any flaws in your thinking.
i'm not feigning ignorance when i ask you questions, i'm making an effort to not misrepresent what you're saying.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:12 pm
by Lapsa
In post 427, Lapsa wrote:
you do realize that's just continuation and you are making it worse?
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:17 pm
by northsidegal
funny how you quote a post originally accusing me of defending shinobi - i seriously think you have issues with confirmation bias.
let's talk something other than just reads then - what do you make of my claim?
oh, wait - this is obvious. i don't know how i had missed this before - shinobi must have jailed me. i mean, i'm still not sure why you think i should have died night one but that would explain it.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:27 pm
by Lapsa
In post 652, northsidegal wrote:funny how you quote a post originally accusing me of defending shinobi - i seriously think you have issues with confirmation bias.
what exactly you find funny?
In post 652, northsidegal wrote:
let's talk something other than just reads then - what do you make of my claim?
I don't believe it
and it's not restricting enough to just let you go
oh, wait - this is obvious. i don't know how i had missed this before - shinobi must have jailed me. i mean, i'm still not sure why you think i should have died night one but that would explain it.
no, it's almost certain that i was the vig shot and nero was the scum shot. it's possible that nero protected whoever scum were shooting but i think they probably just shot him.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:56 pm
by Lapsa
how come you were unsure why you should have died N1 yet 10 minutes later you are almost certain that you were a vig hit?
and nero was the scum shot. it's possible that nero protected whoever scum were shooting but i think they probably just shot him.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:11 pm
by northsidegal
i'm not sure why transcend is /saying/ that i should have died night one.
the second question was also a choice you asked me about - given the idea of mafia or the vigilante shooting me the vig shot seems more likely, but i still don't know.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:17 pm
by Lapsa
In post 658, northsidegal wrote:
i'm not sure why transcend is /saying/ that i should have died night one.
so you just casually baited transcend to admit he's a vig for no good reason, correct?
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:19 pm
by Lapsa
why are you almost certain that you were a vig shot?
In post 633, northsidegal wrote:really, i don't. you shot me night one? i have no clue why i would have lived through that. the obvious thought is that nero guarded me but not only do i find that doubtful, but it would also imply that scum shot him as well. perhaps there's a second protective role?
of course, there's always the explanation that you're just lying, but i really don't believe that here.
In post 635, Transcend wrote:Aite I'm not vig but you literally have a gun as you thought i was gs.
So hard claim lady.
In post 636, northsidegal wrote:vigilante. there's more to it but again, i don't think it's beneficial to reveal everything - it'd allows scum to plan their play accordingly.
i thought it was implied in your question of if i thought nero was the vig shot. if nero was the vig shot and i was shot but didn't die night one then it would imply that i was the mafia shot - i didn't think that was true so the inverse seemed likely to me, that i was the vig shot and nero was the mafia shot.
In post 633, northsidegal wrote:really, i don't. you shot me night one? i have no clue why i would have lived through that. the obvious thought is that nero guarded me but not only do i find that doubtful, but it would also imply that scum shot him as well. perhaps there's a second protective role?
of course, there's always the explanation that you're just lying, but i really don't believe that here.
In post 635, Transcend wrote:Aite I'm not vig but you literally have a gun as you thought i was gs.
So hard claim lady.
In post 636, northsidegal wrote:vigilante. there's more to it but again, i don't think it's beneficial to reveal everything - it'd allows scum to plan their play accordingly.
i'm really not sure what i'm missing here.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:00 pm
by Transcend
Thing is, I may or may not be vig
Regardless of what I am, you are not vig
So bye
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:04 pm
by northsidegal
what did you mean when you said "validated my fake claim"? why do you think i'm lying about being vig?
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:07 pm
by Transcend
633
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:33 pm
by northsidegal
is there a reason you're being so deliberately obtuse? unless you explaining would require revealing something about your role you don't want to, all you're accomplishing is clouding the truth and potentially furthering a misconception.
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:57 pm
by Dunkerdoodles
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:06 pm
by Transcend
the fact that you treated my vig claim as anything but bullshit as seen in 633 shows that your vig claim is also bullshit.
i thought it was implied in your question of if i thought nero was the vig shot. if nero was the vig shot and i was shot but didn't die night one then it would imply that i was the mafia shot - i didn't think that was true so the inverse seemed likely to me, that i was the vig shot and nero was the mafia shot.
633
you came up with that and tryharding to squeeze in
making stuff up w/o any kind of evidence with every new post you make
transcend outplayed you
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:25 pm
by Lapsa
In post 670, Transcend wrote:the fact that you treated my vig claim as anything but bullshit as seen in 633 shows that your vig claim is also bullshit.
perhaps you are tracker gunsmith vig motion detector role cop guerilla spiderman
of horse! that would explain it!
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:35 pm
by northsidegal
In post 670, Transcend wrote:the fact that you treated my vig claim as anything but bullshit as seen in 633 shows that your vig claim is also bullshit.
the modifier of my role makes it entirely clear to me that there is another vig out there. that person should know that i'm not lying.
