Mafiascum.net

In post 649, ruru wrote:VOTE: Something_Smart

In post 648, Something_Smart wrote: How do you have anything AI on me?

In post 648, Something_Smart wrote:How do you have anything AI on me?

Well, this quote especially

It reads like "but I didn't leave any evidence" not "but I'm not guilty"

Well, I'd be skeptical of ANY strong read on me, not just a scumread.

I don't believe that a strong scumread on me is questionable because I'm obviously town-- if that were the case, I'd write something closer to the latter. Instead, I believe that a strong scumread on me is questionable because I haven't given enough content to be readable that confidently, in which case my guilt or innocence is actually irrelevant.

Also, by what little meta I've read so far, it feels consistent with how scum.you might think

Yeah, it is. But that's because it's consistent with how I think, independent of the color of my role PM

Hmm

What are your current reads?

I mean very little readable content is concerning in itself but idfk

HitAlt I have a few issues with your meta read and general scum!ducky reasoning here. I am a complex and confusing human being and your meta read is very basic. If you want to talk about it hmu. Have you read 1+ of my scumgames and maybe know a few of my town games?

Irrespective I'm an awful D1 lynch so I'd strongly suggest finding someone else.

Also just a quick apology in general, I'm busy irl and have really inconsistent internet access (hence cautionary v/la status). My level of energy for mafia is super low and this game is lowish as far as my level of engagement goes

Expand on your progression on ofrhz

What do you want exactly

I'm not sure how you went from disagreeing with people scumreading ofhrz, to being unsure, to agreeing with them, when the reasoning never actually changed

In post 659, jjh927 wrote:I'm not sure how you went from disagreeing with people scumreading ofhrz, to being unsure, to agreeing with them, when the reasoning never actually changed

that's a good point

was being dumb with my initial read imo
I talked myself out of the stuff I was liking from ofrhz for being AI

In post 653, ruru wrote:Also, by what little meta I've read so far, it feels consistent with how scum.you might think

TW answering questions right now compared to SS disappearing from the thread when asked for reads, combined with the above, makes SS much more likely to be scum in my opinion

In post 659, jjh927 wrote:I'm not sure how you went from disagreeing with people scumreading ofhrz, to being unsure, to agreeing with them, when the reasoning never actually changed

In post 660, BlackStar wrote:

In post 659, jjh927 wrote:I'm not sure how you went from disagreeing with people scumreading ofhrz, to being unsure, to agreeing with them, when the reasoning never actually changed

that's a good point

In post 661, the worst wrote:was being dumb with my initial read imo
I talked myself out of the stuff I was liking from ofrhz for being AI

Why are you guys talking about this now when I made this exact same point a few days ago? @Duckling I think you never answered that, I'm catching up right now but skimmed a little bit and didn't see anything; Here's the post I'm talking about.

Also sorry for not being here, this was my last tests' week, infamous week with 4 tests in a row; we have 2 each semester, and this is my last college semester so yay. That, with a friend's father passing away on Friday made a really busy weekend. I'll try to catch up now.

didn't really process that post. you took 354 out of context, refer to like 254 or thereabouts (where I talked about ofrhz originally, which is what I was elaborating on in 354 anyway)

Are people just going ctrl+f and searching for ofrhz in my iso? because I talked w blackstar about my read trajectory as well so that's gonna be confusing.

Blacky--what if anything did you get out of us talking in real time?

feels like I'm stuck explaining myself in circles.

In post 663, pinturicchio wrote:That, with a friend's father passing away on Friday made a really busy weekend.

Sorry to hear

Woah it's skitter

omfg I didn't even make that connection

In post 641, Almost50 wrote:

Sharing is Caring D1 VC #10

ofrhz (3): northsidegal, BlackStar, the worst,
jjh927 (2): Mathdino, ruru,
BlackStar (1): ofrhz,
Mathdino (1): pinturicchio,
the worst (1): HitAlt,
ruru (1): davesaz,
pinturicchio (1): jjh927,

Not Voting: HeWhoSwims, Something_Smart, Zoronos,

S_S V/LA till Tuesday

(expired on 2018-06-06 23:00:00)

A neutron goes into a bar and asks the bartender, "How much for a beer?"
The bartender replies, "For you, no charge."

This still confuses me

ofrhz why are you voteparked on Blackstar?
Pintu why are you voteparked on Math?

In post 665, the worst wrote:Blacky--what if anything did you get out of us talking in real time?

Talking to you helped me to better articulate the reasons why ohfrz seems scummy. It also moved you from scum to null

In post 655, ruru wrote:Hmm

What are your current reads?

Town feelings on ofrhz and HitAlt, smaller ones on you and Zoronos.
Slightest of scumleans on nsg and BlackStar, though I trust Mathdino to read nsg and BlackStar is usually scummy from what I recall of him. (Though the last time I thought he felt bad I was right.)

Also... if you think my activity is indicative of anything other than me playing Settlers of Catan with my brother, you'd be wrong.

In post 671, BlackStar wrote:

In post 665, the worst wrote:Blacky--what if anything did you get out of us talking in real time?

Talking to you helped me to better articulate the reasons why ohfrz seems scummy. It also moved you from scum to null

we're on a similar page wrt ofrhz then

In post 672, Something_Smart wrote:Also... if you think my activity is indicative of anything other than me playing Settlers of Catan with my brother, you'd be wrong.

Catan > mafia.
ALWAYS.