Mafiascum.net

*so used to say lynch

I'm done correcting myself now. Just tell me your thought on either post #646 or #647 lol

In post 647, Redemption wrote:Do you guys want to agree on to who to lynch now?

*looks at activity log*
yes... let's decide before giving any of these low-content posters a chance to reengage with the game

In post 647, Redemption wrote:I propose that we decide between PenguinPower and Dectivite Pikachu

No way in hell PP is our D1 lynch. All your (plural) cases on him are flimsy and the wagon comp is bad.
Pika feels like lynchbait tbh

In post 649, Redemption wrote:IN A BILLION GAMES

Town needs to town it up more so I can cross their names out please and thank you.
Stop doing the "I'm acting scummy to draw out scum but I'm actually town, they'll never know teehee" thing and get in line for town points

In post 407, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 406, MaryJoLisa wrote:nor for the game state.

I disagree- penguin and I TR him as a result of his "flailing" (semantically incorrect but appropriate)

Do you still see him as flailing?

I don't and now that I understand he's no newbie, I feel no need to hold back on a D1 lynch.

VOTE: Redemption

In post 625, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 488, schadd_ wrote:{peng redemp}
{psyche}
{cdb}
{nm}
{vorq mjl gamma}
{uzi otter perfo}
{Detective Pikachu}

In post 492, schadd_ wrote:ugh

{peng redemp psyche}
[...]

In post 496, schadd_ wrote:oh nevermind seems not lol

{peng redemp}
{psyche}
{cdb}
{vorq}
{nm}
{mjl gamma}
{uzi otter perfo}
{Detective Pikachu}

I don't really get why there was the need to post this twice... there would have been no reason to make a new list just because you were changing your placement of psyche if he wasn't moving more than one tier. Seems like ... not exactly busywork, but I don't see why you felt the need to do this as town. If it was just because Vork was below NM, why was Vork still below NM in 488?

Interesting take... I don't see this as busywork (or AI) at all. Calling someone out for posting a slightly updated reads list, and your posts 626, 627, 628, and 630 that are devoid of anything useful seem more like busywork, actually.

I don't think the case against schadd is strong enough to be trying to start that wagon right now, whereas you could be looking into any of the other people who have wagons going. Think they're all town? Why, then?

VOTE: Detective Pikachu

Just going to remind everyone though that LUV still hasn't contributed anything of substance, and I'm wondering why I'm the only one who cares.

Penguin vs. Psyche is reading TvT to me. I don't see a Penguin lynch today and if ppl aren't getting on board with LUV, then this is where I'm going.

The only thing that gives me pause is Redemption trying to push to eliminate competing wagons already. Vote counts were 4, 3, 2, 2, so at 6 days out, what makes the 3-person wagon more viable than the 2-person wagons?

In post 559, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: MaryJoLisa

Want to elaborate on this?

In post 563, Redemption wrote: [...]

Probably scum

: Detective Pikachu, Lucky Otter

Detective Pikachu: Just returned from over a day of absence without mentioning or justifying it.

Lucky Otter: Only person voting me as of now. Just because he didn't like my answers at some point in the game, wasn't even bothered emphasizing on his motives since.

[...]

First of all that is not a great reason to put Pikachu as probably scum.

Re: me, I haven't been voting you for awhile, and I did justify my motives in 177.

A couple of lazy reads here.

In post 629, Detective Pikachu wrote:VOTE: schadd

YES

it's true that DP's posts are uninspiring
but i can't really get a read off any of it

In post 657, schadd_ wrote:

In post 629, Detective Pikachu wrote:VOTE: schadd

YES

This is more of what I'm talking about. the confidence level here seems fake.

And this is what I mean with the meme too. It's day 1 and I had a busy week so apparently that means his scumread on me is so strong that he's going to abandon the hope of working with the person you're focusing on?

Like I have made shitposty memes as part of pushes before... On like day 4 when I have total confidence th slot is scum. I wouldn't make one to get a read on a player because if I was wrong then the player is probably going to lose objectivity. I don't feel objective about schadd because right now I more feel while he is still alive in the game I don't really want to do anything other than lynch him. This is what it means to do a bad faith push and that's why I don't think town does aggressive tunnely memes like that day 1. I don't feel like he actually is thinking about my slot, he is thinking about how he looks pushing my slot.

im not really closed off to working with u

In post 656, LuckyOtter wrote:Just returned from over a day of absence without mentioning or justifying it.

I'm sorry guys I was out for a few hours. It was quite necessary. Please don't scum read me for it

I mean I don't think you make that meme if you don't want me to tunnel you because right now seeing people pat you on the back for that post has me thinking I either lynch you or get lynched so I don't have to play with you and deal with this town. I'm hoping you're just scum and if you're not I don't really see why I should care rn

i think there's a 50%ish chance you flip red and you absolutely have the choice whether you scumread me because of the meme lmao

In post 659, Detective Pikachu wrote:I don't feel objective about schadd because right now I more feel while he is still alive in the game I don't really want to do anything other than lynch him. This is what it means to do a bad faith push and that's why I don't think town does aggressive tunnely memes like that day 1. I don't feel like he actually is thinking about my slot, he is thinking about how he looks pushing my slot.

I guess there's some touchy history with that meme post? I didn't pick up on the nuances of it. I just liked the smileys around Psyche's name.

I mean I think you're great I just don't think you do the meme as town, it seems purely bad faith.

I don't think mod will accept that hammer but I guess that's as close as nm gets to intent.

I'm a ub so I'm basically not confirmable, lynch away just get schadd tomorrow.

I have no history with schadd that's relevant to how I'm reading the meme; I'm talking about the thought process behind making the meme and the decision to do so on day 1. I think making memes can be ti but not in this circumstance.

i think the only person that was like "hmm gotta lynch dp now bc of schadds hilarious meme" was vorkuta and even if you're forced into trying to lynch me you're still cordially invited to try to form other reads

if your catchup looks wolfy to me (slightly though not that much) it's because you went through the motions of assessing other slots than me without really coming to conclusions (lucky otter is "maybe townie", "big oof" at redemption, annoyed with cdb

In post 664, schadd_ wrote:i think there's a 50%ish chance you flip red and you absolutely have the choice whether you scumread me because of the meme lmao

How "50%?"

blugh UNVOTE:

In post 666, Detective Pikachu wrote:I'm a ub

AHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA
No

In post 669, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 664, schadd_ wrote:i think there's a 50%ish chance you flip red and you absolutely have the choice whether you scumread me because of the meme lmao

How "50%?"

what do you mean

no schadd u can't