Mafiascum.net

In post 648, Alisae wrote:Waaaaah my vote isn’t opportunistic my read on her was there before the vote I totally didn’t vote her just then because the wagon was gaining momentum waaaaaah

Ofc you’re not going to vote Kop, no one is going to hammer a slot who wasn’t posting.
I’m flipping town and considering how the day is currently being played out, that brings a lot of attention to you that you don’t want.

Voting my biggest scumread when their wagon was gaining momentum is scummy? It felt pretty natural to me.

I believe if I was scum and Kop was Town then I would have handled that situation differently - I wouldn’t have called for him to be replaced for a start, when his dodgy flippy vote already gave grounds for suspicion.

In post 647, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 644, Alisae wrote:

In post 642, Luca Blight wrote:318 - Klick was a topic of discussion at that time, so I iso’d him to see exactly where i stood on him. Earlier you called me scummy for being unsure of my Klick read, and now you’re calling me scummy for giving a solid, more confident townread on Klick. That is contradictory BS on your part.

here let me transcribe what your post here essentially is
This post - oh this post is a town post
This post - this post is also town
This post - and so is this one
This post - and this one also

Did anything you say add anything to the game?
No.

And guess what
In that exact same post, you STILL gave yourself room to turn that read into a scumread.

I do believe I added something to the game - the fact that Klick was the one who actually did the test (not Datisi) and that he didn’t try to take credit for it. No-one else had touched upon these points.

What is wrong with saying multiple posts are townie when Iso’ing someone? I said it exactly how I saw it.

waaaaaah
I came up with 1 irrelevant fact!
Waaaaaaaaah
My 1 irrelevant fact (that ANYONE can figure out just by READING THE GAME so its not actually new) is supposed to make up for the fact that I’m not actually doing anything but Ali isn’t buying it
Waaaaaaah

Seriously fuck off with that noise
You can add 1 thing but like, your iso is still shit and you’re still not doing anything

Also whats wrong with it just repeating that someone is town over and over again is that it can look unnatural and like you’re trying to force a read through to look like you’re trying.

In post 649, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 646, Alisae wrote:

In post 645, Luca Blight wrote:488 - opportunistic? Yeah right. I’ve been consistent on my Datisi read throughout.

And yet I wasn’t opportunistic on Kop’s wagon (of which you know the alignment already). You don’t mention this, however, as it doesn’t fit your narrative.

and you didn’t vote her earlier because?????????????????????

My read on her wasn’t that strong (given she had hardly any content) until after her reads list and Kop vote. I believe I’ve explained everything with regards to Datisi already.

so lets wait to see if someone else votes Datisi to see if the wagon will actually gain momentum instead of just voting her when she votes Kop
That’ll make me look sooooooo townie

In post 650, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 648, Alisae wrote:Waaaaah my vote isn’t opportunistic my read on her was there before the vote I totally didn’t vote her just then because the wagon was gaining momentum waaaaaah

Ofc you’re not going to vote Kop, no one is going to hammer a slot who wasn’t posting.
I’m flipping town and considering how the day is currently being played out, that brings a lot of attention to you that you don’t want.

Voting my biggest scumread when their wagon was gaining momentum is scummy? It felt pretty natural to me.

Yes.

In post 650, Luca Blight wrote:I believe if I was scum and Kop was Town then I would have handled that situation differently - I wouldn’t have called for him to be replaced for a start, when his dodgy flippy vote already gave grounds for suspicion.

lol nobody cares

It clearly wasn’t that obvious, given most people thought Datisi was the one who did the test.

You need to grow up, it feels like I’m arguing with a toddler.

You’re scum and scum aren’t people

If you’re Town then you’re a nasty piece of work. Either way, I’m done with this argument.

Seriously, you’re telling ME to grow up?
If you can’t handle how vicious I am grow a thicker skin its the internet
I don’t have to be nice to you

Like, I read the game.
Klick asked about that first
Datisi wanted to go into more detail about it

You don’t need to tell me that Datisi didn’t do the test. I know that.

In post 657, Luca Blight wrote:If you’re Town then you’re a nasty piece of work. Either way, I’m done with this argument.

BYE!!!!!!!!
Eat rope!!!!!!!!!!

I have thick skin enough, don’t worry, but basic manners/respect wouldn’t go amiss.

The point about Klick was that it seemed genuine due to his read progression - I’m not sure how you’re not grasping that point.

Because its not new to me???????????

But it was new at the time of writing, and your original point was that I hadn’t added anything new.

Stop moving the goalposts.

Doesn’t matter

Its not new to me
You’re not adding anything new to the game.

But yeah, I’m sure that 1 point must mean that you’re ISO is full of very useful contribut-
Oh wait a minute
You’re contributions are awful and you’re scum

In post 662, Luca Blight wrote:But it was new at the time of writing, and your original point was that I hadn’t added anything new.

Stop moving the goalposts.

like, are you trying to manipulate people?
Are you TRYING to be dishonest?
Calling something “new” when all anyone has to do is read the game isn’t useful contributions. You’re just paying attention to the game more. You’re not trying to analyze it or come up with any read that is even remotely nuanced.
Everything you’ve posted is super shallow and it sucks

If you’re saying that giving a read and valid reasons (ones which you seem to agree with) for it isn’t adding to the game then I don’t know what else to say to you.

I think your contributions have been pretty shit myself, but now I’m descending to your level of rudeness so I really should end this discussion.

Here is what I am trying to say:
Your content sucks and you should be lynched for it

In post 664, Alisae wrote:Its not new to me
You’re not adding anything new to the game.

But yeah, I’m sure that 1 point must mean that you’re ISO is full of very useful contribut-
Oh wait a minute
You’re contributions are awful and you’re scum

In post 665, Alisae wrote:

In post 662, Luca Blight wrote:But it was new at the time of writing, and your original point was that I hadn’t added anything new.

Stop moving the goalposts.

like, are you trying to manipulate people?
Are you TRYING to be dishonest?
Calling something “new” when all anyone has to do is read the game isn’t useful contributions. You’re just paying attention to the game more. You’re not trying to analyze it or come up with any read that is even remotely nuanced.
Everything you’ve posted is super shallow and it sucks

Do you understand the concept of Iso’ing someone?

And I was ‘analyzing’, I mean that is literally what I was doing, I’m not sure how you can pretend otherwise.

Btw you never explained how I was throwing shade in 85? Was they just put in to pad your terrible case out or what?

Do you understand the concept of that you’re scum and that you need to eat rope????????
Seriously, why haven’t you selfvoted yet??????????
Are you even trying to change my mind????????? It really just doesn’t seem like that and it seems like you’re just defending yourself for the sake of it.

You’re not going to tell me that you’re not scum dude.

At this point no, I’m not trying to change your mind, because you’re either scum or confbiasing beyond reason.

Yeah if I can’t convince scum that they’re scum and they should selfvote I should just stop posting

You have now twice dodged my question about post 85 - how was I throwing shade?

Waaaaaaaah I’m being pushed and the person who’s pushing me is being rude and waaaaaaah someone is being rude to me on the internet waaaaaaaaaaaaaah