In post 641, cyrus62 wrote:@vork you been to concend about roles this game insted of realy scum hunti
Yes... God forbid I care about mechanics... in a game filled with them.
*ahem*
But yeah- I think understanding the setup outprioritizes conventional scumhunting- especially how weak dayplay is in a Bastard game.
I also think it's compete BS that you bring this up considering I have a nice read list where you know my position on literally every player here.... but ok.
Also- if you think yesterday's "slip" wagon in me was going through then....
I think you're OMGUS-ing because I said early on that you have cult equity.
In post 641, cyrus62 wrote:@vork you been to concend about roles this game insted of realy scum hunti
Yes... God forbid I care about mechanics... in a game filled with them.
*ahem*
But yeah- I think understanding the setup outprioritizes conventional scumhunting- especially how weak dayplay is in a Bastard game.
I also think it's compete BS that you bring this up considering I have a nice read list where you know my position on literally every player here.... but ok.
Also- if you think yesterday's "slip" wagon in me was going through then....
I think you're OMGUS-ing because I said early on that you have cult equity.
In post 246, Vorkuta wrote:hypothetical cultleader!baezu is now laughing like a maniac.
you fool if you read the rukes you were hung since you had the mpst votes and yes the way you acted this whole game comes off as scum so yes i do think i found one.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:28 pm
by Iconeum
Cyrus, can you be specific (like quoting posts?) when you say 'the way you act'?
In post 641, cyrus62 wrote:@vork you been to concend about roles this game insted of realy scum hunti
Yes... God forbid I care about mechanics... in a game filled with them.
*ahem*
But yeah- I think understanding the setup outprioritizes conventional scumhunting- especially how weak dayplay is in a Bastard game.
I also think it's compete BS that you bring this up considering I have a nice read list where you know my position on literally every player here.... but ok.
Also- if you think yesterday's "slip" wagon in me was going through then....
I think you're OMGUS-ing because I said early on that you have cult equity.
In post 246, Vorkuta wrote:hypothetical cultleader!baezu is now laughing like a maniac.
you fool if you read the rules you were hung since you had the mpst votes and yes the way you acted this whole game comes off as scum so yes i do think i found one.
fixd
what if the reason he broke the rules was to stop us from killing town though? o wpi;d have voted you also so yea
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:37 pm
by Iconeum
Cyrus please stop
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:38 pm
by Iconeum
In post 656, cyrus62 wrote:what if the reason he broke the rules was to stop us from killing town though
if what you are thinking here is true, then he broke the rules to stop a vorkuta lynch
which means vorkuta is town according to your own logic
In post 656, cyrus62 wrote:what if the reason he broke the rules was to stop us from killing town though
if what you are thinking here is true, then he broke the rules to stop a vorkuta lynch
which means vorkuta is town according to your own logic
unless doc and vork are town but at the time doctor votes were falling off so maybe.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:46 pm
by Iconeum
In post 659, cyrus62 wrote:unless doc and vork are town but at the time doctor votes were falling off so maybe.
that would make even more sense, sacrificing yourself to stop 2 town lynches
VOTE: nomnom
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:48 pm
by Vorkuta
Can't get behind nom- I've decided on
In post 563, Vorkuta wrote:But this feels genuine with you invoking "first time evar" so idk
+
Nom' s lack of followup
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:58 pm
by shos
VOTE: nom[\v]
BTW I think we shouldn't lunch Drew.. assuming cult, it puts us in a 3 cult 1? SK(2? Scum?) Tomorrow which is bad. Just let's try to hit the bad ones, and hope the bastard roles is for our best
What do you want me to say more than what I said yesterday?
If I say more, I'll be accused again of hammering people with the same stuff over and over again. My case on you hasn't changed. It's exactly the same, modkill or not.
Actually this vote was so bad and he contradicts himself in his ISO about how to handle Drew so this needs to go. Either you're really bad as town or you're openwolfing.
VOTE: Shos
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:12 pm
by nomnomnom
Imagine voting Drew all of yesterday and now saying "lol let's not do that" and jump on a completely unrelated wagon without any kind of justification whatsoever just because someone else did it. That's just a pretty scummy move.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:13 pm
by Iconeum
nommers, you had an RVS vote there that turned into a scumread, not the other way around
what say you
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:15 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 667, Iconeum wrote:nommers, you had an RVS vote there that turned into a scumread, not the other way around
what say you
Alright, so I happened to vote someone in RVS who I thought happened to be pretty scummy. What's the problem?
And even if you're going the direction I am thinking, it is not a reason to lynch me and it's akin to a mislynch. That is if I'm correct about the sort of conclusion you're reaching.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:18 pm
by nomnomnom
By the way this Korina stuff is seriously unlucky for me. I was about to finally get one of my scumreads lynched and all of a sudden there's a modkill, and I'm the one voted? Jesus christ, talk about 0% luck lol
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:20 pm
by Iconeum
In post 668, nomnomnom wrote:Alright, so I happened to vote someone in RVS who I thought happened to be pretty scummy
what do you think was scummy about vorkuta at that time?
In post 668, nomnomnom wrote:Alright, so I happened to vote someone in RVS who I thought happened to be pretty scummy
what do you think was scummy about vorkuta at that time?
I saw that post, my intuition was like "vote him", so I did.
Then I found his other posts scummy, so I had no other reason to change it, and pushed him as a lynch yesterday. I don't see the problem with that. It doesn't matter right now though, Shos vote and justification is extremely scummy. Let's go there.
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:27 pm
by Iconeum
ok
VOTE: shos
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:19 am
by PMysterious
In post 656, cyrus62 wrote:
what if the reason he broke the rules was to stop us from killing town though? o wpi;d have voted you also so yea
If Korrina broke the rules to stop us from killing town, then either Korrina wanted to stop us from killing Drew or he/she knew that Vork was Town. Either way you look at it, it does not help your case. Drew has told us he's a cultifier, and yes, I wanted chaos to reign the previous day, but leaving a Cultifier alive is a mistake that can cost us dearly. If Vork is scum or not, it doesn't matter right now. What matters is that we eliminate the cult as soon as possible.
Why are we having these discussions now when we SHOULD be lynching the Cultifier? We can save it for tomorrow when all of us are worrying less about changing alignments.
In post 656, cyrus62 wrote:
what if the reason he broke the rules was to stop us from killing town though? o wpi;d have voted you also so yea
If Korrina broke the rules to stop us from killing town, then either Korrina wanted to stop us from killing Drew or he/she knew that Vork was Town. Either way you look at it, it does not help your case. Drew has told us he's a cultifier, and yes, I wanted chaos to reign the previous day, but leaving a Cultifier alive is a mistake that can cost us dearly. If Vork is scum or not, it doesn't matter right now. What matters is that we eliminate the cult as soon as possible.
Why are we having these discussions now when we SHOULD be lynching the Cultifier? We can save it for tomorrow when all of us are worrying less about changing alignments.
So wait, yesterday when people tell you that you're all "lol xd let's have fun" but now you want to lynch Drew?
Is this town alright or?