In post 327, Datisi wrote:"evidence to suggest someone is scum" =/= "think somebody is scum", don't twist it
Like if you placed a "serious" vote
Then there must have been evidence to SUGGEST I am scum
Which you literally confirmed, because your reasoning was "referencing past games"
Which is literally "evidence to suggest"
This? I’ve already told you that you are wrong here. This isn’t true.
Is this what you really want to rehash?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:38 pm
by Datisi
In post 648, Wimpy wrote:There is nothing that relevant on page 14.
In post 647, Wimpy wrote:Page 14 definitely relates to that post.
ok
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:39 pm
by Wimpy
In post 329, Datisi wrote:Pedit: i still don't see a single place where he lied
This is you ignoring he lied by claiming you don’t see it.
I just spelled it out for you and you sidestepped it again. Why?
In post 327, Datisi wrote:"evidence to suggest someone is scum" =/= "think somebody is scum", don't twist it
Like if you placed a "serious" vote
Then there must have been evidence to SUGGEST I am scum
Which you literally confirmed, because your reasoning was "referencing past games"
Which is literally "evidence to suggest"
This? I’ve already told you that you are wrong here. This isn’t true.
In post 648, Wimpy wrote:There is nothing that relevant on page 14.
In post 647, Wimpy wrote:Page 14 definitely relates to that post.
ok
Page 14 is where you ignore his lie and try to tell me false information.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:41 pm
by Luca Blight
In post 647, Wimpy wrote:Page 14 definitely relates to that post. That post I made is basically the entire push from menal. It’s a lie but nobody , like actually nobody cares he’s lied.
It's not really a lie, though. A slight misrep, maybe, but nothing major and nothing I couldn't see coming from either alignment.
The AI thing is more the conviction with which he has made his push, which reads more as town atm. I have seen scum push aggressively like this early doors so I'm not cementing him as town, but it's enough for an early town-lean.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:41 pm
by Datisi
@everyone not named wimpy
Please read pg 14 and give me you opinion on it
Thanks
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:42 pm
by Wimpy
In post 644, Wimpy wrote:He accused me of saying I voted you because I thought you were scum.
Did I say that? No
That’s the narrative he’s pushed. It’s a lie
Why are you not commenting on this?
He made that accusation multiple times. Each time it’s still a lie.
In post 644, Wimpy wrote:He accused me of saying I voted you because I thought you were scum.
Did I say that? No
That’s the narrative he’s pushed. It’s a lie
Why are you not commenting on this?
He made that accusation multiple times. Each time it’s still a lie.
Ok I'll comment
He asked why "do you think I'm scum". You directed him to posts where you explained why I'm scummy. Implication that "you thought i was scum" seems alright. Your responses didn't help you.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:44 pm
by Wimpy
In post 655, Luca Blight wrote:It's not really a lie, though. A slight misrep, maybe, but nothing major and nothing I couldn't see coming from either alignment.
It is a lie cause he accused me of something I never did.
If it happened once maybe it’s a misrep. He’s pushed it 20 plus pages and when I’ve explained he’s been wrong, he still pushes the narrative. When I prove he’s wrong he ignores it.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:46 pm
by Datisi
Man I can't wait for icon to get into the shitshow too
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:47 pm
by Alduskkel
In post 656, Datisi wrote:Please read pg 14 and give me you opinion on it
I feel like the whole thing is mostly based on communication failures that each side perceives as the other one lying/being hypocritical and the reality is that it's not very alignment indicative.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:47 pm
by Wimpy
In post 658, Datisi wrote:He asked why "do you think I'm scum". You directed him to posts where you explained why I'm scummy. Implication that "you thought i was scum" seems alright. Your responses didn't help you.
So he made a mistake. Ignored me when I explained he made a mistake and just kept pushing that narrative over and over again.
Explaining why I think you are scum after I voted you for something scummy and after you’ve done more scummy things doesn’t warrant him blatantly lying like he did.
But thank you for responding.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:49 pm
by Wimpy
Now I’m done. Nobody in this game seems to cares about him lying which is a shame.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:50 pm
by Luca Blight
This game is melting my brain.
I read on p14 that Wimpy said you 'don't need evidence to say someone is scum', which I would agree with, but then why are you now saying that there is no reason to warrant a scumread on you?
That's just hypocrisy. It's ok for you to SR Datisi without firm evidence, but completely unreasonable for others to do the same to you?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:52 pm
by Datisi
In post 664, Luca Blight wrote:but then why are you now saying that there is no reason to warrant a scumread on you?
He's a perfect played whose skill shall not be critiqued and who's done absolutely nothing wrong
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:55 pm
by Wimpy
Guys just lynch me and end the day. I don’t even care if you let menal get away with it. Mafiascum has clearly deteriorated since I’ve been gone. Nobody cares about the truth. Nobody cares about finding scum.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:56 pm
by Datisi
AtE AtE AtE AtE
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:02 pm
by Plum
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:05 pm
by Datisi
oof.mp3
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:08 pm
by Datisi
Hiiiiii Iconnnnnnnnn
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:18 pm
by alimdia
Sigh, I feel like this game is severely compromised
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:19 pm
by Datisi
I've seen worse.
Unvote the policy vote pretty please?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:24 pm
by Iconeum
hi everyone
lemme catchup today
is there a TL;DR for now?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:26 pm
by Datisi
I got voted because bullshit
Mena reacted to that bulshit
there was a lot of bullshit