Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:30 pm
That presupposes I was frustrated, I didn't feel frustrated at all when I made that post.
You have the most accurate scum reads of anyone I've played with so far on this site. Fuzzy is such a bad and opportunistic push. Although you did do the same thing with Aaron. I guess I have you in the BoP category in my mind so it pings me when you're pushing in the wrong direction.In post 596, Luca Blight wrote:How’ve I deviated from my town meta?
I townread you that game, but you made your own bed with the lolhammer. I thought your lynch was beneficial for Town even if you flipped green, and I was right as we ended up winning.In post 655, popsofctown wrote:Luca mislynched me when I was obvtown in Autumnal. Total baddie
Lol I was just about to post this same thingIn post 657, popsofctown wrote:I SAID TO STOP TOWNTONING
This is incorrect. Emotions are commonly the same regardless of the nature of one's soul, as they are the manifestation of the person's opinions and ideals. If he feels strongly enough about such a thing being worth having that large a reaction to, it would have little to nothing to do with the color of his soul.In post 603, Luca Blight wrote:Why would scum replace out over a player deliberately lying and drawing attention to himself? That would be a perfect opportunity to dig into a tunnel. The fact he replaced out over it proves his anger was genuine, which only makes sense from town there.In post 600, popsofctown wrote:In post 598, Luca Blight wrote:His anger about the lying and subsequent replace-out was obviously Town imo.In post 597, popsofctown wrote:In post 596, Luca Blight wrote: I thought dog was pretty obviously Town, even if I am slightly biased.Perceiving his iso as better than leantown is definitely implausible to me. I agree with Ame's read hereI don't view it that way, but eh I can see you seeing it that way after getting biased by a green PM if you really have one
Come play mafia with us
Do I get to say the same thing about lolhammeringIn post 659, Luca Blight wrote:I was right as we ended up winning.
I suppose you can, I couldn’t refute it.In post 663, popsofctown wrote:Do I get to say the same thing about lolhammeringIn post 659, Luca Blight wrote:I was right as we ended up winning.
In a Mini Normal, the mafia know the alignment of every single player in the game, because they are necessarily the only anti-town faction. That's a whole lot of information. Town are (except for knowledge of their own role) going into the setup blind.In post 662, Yshtola Rhul wrote:This is incorrect. Emotions are commonly the same regardless of the nature of one's soul, as they are the manifestation of the person's opinions and ideals. If he feels strongly enough about such a thing being worth having that large a reaction to, it would have little to nothing to do with the color of his soul.In post 603, Luca Blight wrote:Why would scum replace out over a player deliberately lying and drawing attention to himself? That would be a perfect opportunity to dig into a tunnel. The fact he replaced out over it proves his anger was genuine, which only makes sense from town there.In post 600, popsofctown wrote:In post 598, Luca Blight wrote:His anger about the lying and subsequent replace-out was obviously Town imo.In post 597, popsofctown wrote:In post 596, Luca Blight wrote: I thought dog was pretty obviously Town, even if I am slightly biased.Perceiving his iso as better than leantown is definitely implausible to me. I agree with Ame's read hereI don't view it that way, but eh I can see you seeing it that way after getting biased by a green PM if you really have one
Come play mafia with us
The emotions are dependent on the alignment: rabid said himself numerous times that lying townies make it easier for scum to hide. This shows it was a townie ideal and that he recognized the benefit from a scum perspective.In post 662, Yshtola Rhul wrote:This is incorrect. Emotions are commonly the same regardless of the nature of one's soul, as they are the manifestation of the person's opinions and ideals. If he feels strongly enough about such a thing being worth having that large a reaction to, it would have little to nothing to do with the color of his soul.In post 603, Luca Blight wrote:Why would scum replace out over a player deliberately lying and drawing attention to himself? That would be a perfect opportunity to dig into a tunnel. The fact he replaced out over it proves his anger was genuine, which only makes sense from town there.In post 600, popsofctown wrote:In post 598, Luca Blight wrote:His anger about the lying and subsequent replace-out was obviously Town imo.In post 597, popsofctown wrote:In post 596, Luca Blight wrote: I thought dog was pretty obviously Town, even if I am slightly biased.Perceiving his iso as better than leantown is definitely implausible to me. I agree with Ame's read hereI don't view it that way, but eh I can see you seeing it that way after getting biased by a green PM if you really have one
Come play mafia with us
I find that I develop much stronger reads on people when I've interacted with them, so can I answer this question after I talk with Tom?In post 636, Luca Blight wrote:What do you think of Tom?
Do you see the folly of this stance? Those who lead the charge against falsehoods with no higher meaning are those who benefit the most from the false accusation.In post 671, Luca Blight wrote:The emotions are dependent on the alignment: rabid said himself numerous times that lying townies make it easier for scum to hide. This shows it was a townie ideal and that he recognized the benefit from a scum perspective.In post 662, Yshtola Rhul wrote:This is incorrect. Emotions are commonly the same regardless of the nature of one's soul, as they are the manifestation of the person's opinions and ideals. If he feels strongly enough about such a thing being worth having that large a reaction to, it would have little to nothing to do with the color of his soul.In post 603, Luca Blight wrote:Why would scum replace out over a player deliberately lying and drawing attention to himself? That would be a perfect opportunity to dig into a tunnel. The fact he replaced out over it proves his anger was genuine, which only makes sense from town there.In post 600, popsofctown wrote:In post 598, Luca Blight wrote:His anger about the lying and subsequent replace-out was obviously Town imo.In post 597, popsofctown wrote:In post 596, Luca Blight wrote: I thought dog was pretty obviously Town, even if I am slightly biased.Perceiving his iso as better than leantown is definitely implausible to me. I agree with Ame's read hereI don't view it that way, but eh I can see you seeing it that way after getting biased by a green PM if you really have one
Come play mafia with us