Mafiascum.net

come on s_s

In post 649, PenguinPower wrote:Their answer is in the same post

In post 637, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i also believe that Hoopla flipping red absolutely condemns Penguin whereas the opposite is not necessarily the case, and so this is a better elimination for today.

That's not an answer. It's just two unrelated statements, the second of which does not follow from the first.

If it is true that you are definitely scum if Hoopla is (something which I don't follow at all, but I'm discussing the logic here and not the premises), then you have a strictly higher chance of being scum than Hoopla does, and you flipping town also clears Hoopla, so it seems far better to execute you in that case.

i mean - that's objectively their reasoning for the hoopla vote, validity aside.

In post 644, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 565, Uncrowned wrote:sorry to be self-indulgent but do you have any thoughts on Post 552

It seems mostly accurate and I would like to hear a response from dave if he hasn't given one yet.

I did, so you can comment on it.

In post 651, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 649, PenguinPower wrote:Their answer is in the same post

In post 637, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i also believe that Hoopla flipping red absolutely condemns Penguin whereas the opposite is not necessarily the case, and so this is a better elimination for today.

That's not an answer. It's just two unrelated statements, the second of which does not follow from the first.

If it is true that you are definitely scum if Hoopla is (something which I don't follow at all, but I'm discussing the logic here and not the premises), then you have a strictly higher chance of being scum than Hoopla does, and you flipping town also clears Hoopla, so it seems far better to execute you in that case.

i guess you're right, I didn't think that through, and maybe the penguin!scum if hoopla!scum was misguided and a bad conclusion to draw from my argument. hoopla (imho) is more dangerous as scum than penguin is, i think hoopla is a more accepted wagon for others (due to a reason for my penguin read i cannot talk about), and i want more time for penguin to post before i'm confident in my read on him, so i'm keeping my vote on hoopla.

In post 643, PenguinPower wrote:

tgp

I dont think they're that bad tbh

Ignoring the 4's cuz they're doubled is silly, let's just focus on whoever we think is scum!

In post 645, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 583, skitter30 wrote:Except town!her usually brings a lot more content, is more focused, doesn't ask inane questions which basically dont go anywhere (but this is something she does as scum!), and is capable of quickly becoming an obvtown force to be reckoned with

Maybe?

I don't feel like she exhibited these characteristics that much in the last game I played with her. She did become obvtown but like on D4 after I died, and I died still being paranoid of her.

I guess in my sample set those features were all p prominent in the towngames, and absent in the scumgames

hey look ma! I can rewrite a narrative to fit what I want.

Oh, this?

In post 631, davesaz wrote:I don't normally comment on stuff I agree with or butt into other people's conversations.

It doesn't really feel satisfactory to me. It's certainly possible to respond to someone without butting into their conversation.

In post 655, skitter30 wrote:

In post 643, PenguinPower wrote:

tgp

I dont think they're that bad tbh

Ignoring the 4's cuz they're doubled is silly, let's just focus on whoever we think is scum!

i don't think they actually believe what they are saying.

UNVOTE: ok I’m not really getting scumvibes from tgp.

Can we really talk about whether we can elim in the 4s on d1 cause I kinda wanna get hoopla.

I don't see why we wouldn't be able to.

In post 658, Something_Smart wrote:Oh, this?

In post 631, davesaz wrote:I don't normally comment on stuff I agree with or butt into other people's conversations.

It doesn't really feel satisfactory to me. It's certainly possible to respond to someone without butting into their conversation.

Of course it's possible. I'm saying I don't normally do it.

In post 659, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 655, skitter30 wrote:

In post 643, PenguinPower wrote:

tgp

I dont think they're that bad tbh

Ignoring the 4's cuz they're doubled is silly, let's just focus on whoever we think is scum!

i don't think they actually believe what they are saying.

Eh, maybe I'm underestimating a bit on the commenting on things I agree with thing.
I agree with this. Though PP in general is giving me trouble this game. I don't remember if I normally have that much trouble.

In post 659, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 655, skitter30 wrote:

In post 643, PenguinPower wrote:

tgp

I dont think they're that bad tbh

Ignoring the 4's cuz they're doubled is silly, let's just focus on whoever we think is scum!

i don't think they actually believe what they are saying.

Followup: Is your lilith vote more or less grounded than your thought that TGP doesn't believe what they're saying?

I hope DGB's RL lightens up and Pine is able to play soon, a 7 day deadline is mighty fast with 2 absent.

They are equal in rainbow color.

DGB is probably scum

Did you have a reason for lilith scumread?

yes - mostly her posting on ss and skitter

482 felt like fake paranoia

I will read up tonight.

is that pagetop really all that close?

like ... kinda

I guess I'll grab it anyway