Mafiascum.net

In post 634, Chara wrote:once again Tweet continues to validate me, it's really hard to scumread you for this, even though i want to because you'd be doing such a great job of pocketing me right now if you were scum.
but no i feel like you're going to obvtown again, which is the outcome i wanted anyway.

Yah i am not particularly bothered by being scumread for playing too much (≧∀≦) (sort of)

I'm not very into anime, maybe that plays into it idk

I actually find it interesting that skitts thinks it's a bad reason to prod me, i think it's alright on the basis of it being easier for scum to create content than seem "carefree", as that is usually the case for me

Of course, I get that joining fluff is probably more closely what you'd typically expect scum to do so :/ i'm nowhere yet really. Perhaps a tad odd skitts didn't think of the alternate scenario where Chara thinks that scum!Tweet simply has trouble being fluffy?

i think in a similar spot as auro but again woudln't like form a read off of that

Hi, I'm Daisy.

In post 640, Starcrossed wrote:

In post 621, unwnd wrote:Generally speaking? All of his early posts are really scummy, but part of me is psyched because of the setup

Feel like Pooky would just troll as town just to spite Flavor Leaf for picking him (or maybe I'm projecting)

I'm just naturally scummy I can't help it.

i am assuming unwnd has not played with you before, pooky, but i do think this isn't a strange vibe to get from you.

also my scumread on pooky is just... gone. that was fast.

In post 651, skitter30 wrote:i think in a similar spot as auro but again woudln't like form a read off of that

I don't believe you are.

I've played with pooky plenty of times actually

In post 653, Chara wrote:also my scumread on pooky is just... gone. that was fast.

if you read my posts and assume I'm mostly trolling you will see I have to be good :3

In post 655, unwnd wrote:I've played with pooky plenty of times actually

really?

have we played together in the old days?

In post 654, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 651, skitter30 wrote:i think in a similar spot as auro but again woudln't like form a read off of that

I don't believe you are.

?

In post 650, Morning Tweet wrote:Yah i am not particularly bothered by being scumread for playing too much (≧∀≦) (sort of)

this line pings me as a scumtweet line :3

I don't believe you and Auro are in similar spots at all. I think you had a much more likely chance to being picked by Hectic.

In post 650, Morning Tweet wrote:I actually find it interesting that skitts thinks it's a bad reason to prod me, i think it's alright on the basis of it being easier for scum to create content than seem "carefree", as that is usually the case for me

Of course, I get that joining fluff is probably more closely what you'd typically expect scum to do so :/ i'm nowhere yet really. Perhaps a tad odd skitts didn't think of the alternate scenario where Chara thinks that scum!Tweet simply has trouble being fluffy?

skitter pinged in her response but i'm having a hard time articulating why, something about how her response was straightforwardly correct but failing to account for general weirdness in different players having different mindsets about what is plausible/pushable. just seemed very by the book.

no i was talking about titus, not abt myself
that's why i was confused

i think i'm more likley to be picked than auro, but perhaps not as high as you think i am in this pl

In post 655, unwnd wrote:I've played with pooky plenty of times actually

crap, well there goes my cred.

In post 661, Chara wrote:skitter pinged in her response but i'm having a hard time articulating why, something about how her response was straightforwardly correct but failing to account for general weirdness in different players having different mindsets about what is plausible/pushable. just seemed very by the book.

i still don't think scum start this game that way
i think they join the general scumfest

In post 659, Starcrossed wrote:

In post 650, Morning Tweet wrote:Yah i am not particularly bothered by being scumread for playing too much (≧∀≦) (sort of)

this line pings me as a scumtweet line :3

uh oh! he's onto me!! ♡･ᴗ･♡

it's okay, im not affected by this either

* general flufftest

In post 662, skitter30 wrote:no i was talking about titus, not abt myself
that's why i was confused

i think i'm more likley to be picked than auro, but perhaps not as high as you think i am in this pl

I'm going to do a draft spec sometime. Probably tomorrow morning after I write.

In post 665, Morning Tweet wrote:uh oh! he's onto me!! ♡･ᴗ･♡

*flops ears*

it's ok, i'm secretly on your side too

In post 667, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 662, skitter30 wrote:no i was talking about titus, not abt myself
that's why i was confused

i think i'm more likley to be picked than auro, but perhaps not as high as you think i am in this pl

I'm going to do a draft spec sometime. Probably tomorrow morning after I write.

do you want to mockdraft?

I can roleplay as Hectic or Krazy

the other thing bugging me about skitter is how much she's been focusing on FL so far. that read is a little dependent on how much skitter's townplay relies on finding obvtown/conftown and trying to work with them.

In post 657, Starcrossed wrote:

In post 655, unwnd wrote:I've played with pooky plenty of times actually

really?

have we played together in the old days?

Comments reflected more recently regardless

In post 670, Chara wrote:the other thing bugging me about skitter is how much she's been focusing on FL so far. that read is a little dependent on how much skitter's townplay relies on finding obvtown/conftown and trying to work with them.

?

In post 664, skitter30 wrote:

In post 661, Chara wrote:skitter pinged in her response but i'm having a hard time articulating why, something about how her response was straightforwardly correct but failing to account for general weirdness in different players having different mindsets about what is plausible/pushable. just seemed very by the book.

i still don't think scum start this game that way
i think they join the general scumfest

but do you think it's strange that i, Chara, would think scum might do that?

In post 664, skitter30 wrote:

In post 661, Chara wrote:skitter pinged in her response but i'm having a hard time articulating why, something about how her response was straightforwardly correct but failing to account for general weirdness in different players having different mindsets about what is plausible/pushable. just seemed very by the book.

i still don't think scum start this game that way
i think they join the general scumfest

I can see you thinking that -- it makes sense, but what leads you to believe that Chara is scum forcing a scumread, even up til now?

I maybe lean slightly that you realize Chara took me as a fluffy bat player and thought it odd i wasn't meeting that expectation, but you ignored that when you called it odd that she scumread me despite not knowing my meta for example. maybe a tad overblown

But yeah, joining general scumfest does makes sense in theory so i cant really say this is outright scummy either

pedit: yes that ^