Mafiascum.net

In post 651, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:still just want hammer lmao

In post 650, FBJim wrote:this may be total galaxy brain but the demand of "retract your vote and i'll reveal" is so bizarre and senseless (what's to stop you from just re-voting again?) that i don't even know if it qualifies as scummy


formal request to replace "WIFOM" with "galaxy brain"

In post 629, FBJim wrote:not good enough. nothing in 495 demonstrates intent to force a claim. that post is e-1 with the stated rationale of "somewhat sussing flow trap" but "don't know why and can't really explain why, but it seems very odd"-

KittyTacky wrote:

In post 545, team rocket queen wrote:though maybe kittytacky e-1 is fine if kittytacky is just thinking force claim tos style, hammer or move on

Yup this is it. Maybe it's a mindset difference but where I come from... Not claiming when pushed by half the town is extremely sus.

but now it's "extremely sus". this is not to mention that you were hesitant to E-2 them earlier. this is also not to mention that their refusal to claim when pushed by half the town (not including your push of their PR earlier) happened *after* your vote

In post 644, floo wrote:274 flow's read list looks genuine enough. There are some reads I disagree with, but that will happen with any other readlist, and there is pushing a square peg into a round hole than I'd expect from a scum readlist. It's the first half of D1. If flow trap does not have two scumreads for that reason, we should not force him into making a bad scumread.

Scumleaning Ydrasse at this point. 348 and 524's "work with us" is glib. I have said before why they basically say "go scumread someone else." Someone who has twice as many posts as me doesn't care about any players except flow trap. She has forgotten kittytacky, a former scumread, and her scumread on me is wholly dependent on the flow trap read. The recent response to me was scummy too, attacking my argument as intimidation or whatever as an excuse not to actually respond to my points.

If you asked me for one reason to townread flow trap it would be the existence of the wagon. Considering the poor arguments to vote flow, some of which border on maliciously fallacious, I don't see an alternative to at least one flow trap voter being scum.

Lastly @KittyTacky what do you think about the relationship of these two posts?

In post 33, flow trap wrote:Because I'm a PR

In post 44, flow trap wrote:

In post 43, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:I tend to use a lot of hyperbole and/or "jokeclaim" masons day 1.

Hey mason buddy

In post 659, KittyTacky wrote:However it did not come across as a joke. It came across as more like a scum being caught with their pants down while trying to claim a PR.

In post 658, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 629, FBJim wrote:not good enough. nothing in 495 demonstrates intent to force a claim. that post is e-1 with the stated rationale of "somewhat sussing flow trap" but "don't know why and can't really explain why, but it seems very odd"-

KittyTacky wrote:

In post 545, team rocket queen wrote:though maybe kittytacky e-1 is fine if kittytacky is just thinking force claim tos style, hammer or move on

Yup this is it. Maybe it's a mindset difference but where I come from... Not claiming when pushed by half the town is extremely sus.

but now it's "extremely sus". this is not to mention that you were hesitant to E-2 them earlier. this is also not to mention that their refusal to claim when pushed by half the town (not including your push of their PR earlier) happened *after* your vote

I said I tried to force him to claim before my E-1 so your point is moot.

flow trap wrote:Like, there is literally a ":P" face

FBJim wrote:

In post 658, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 629, FBJim wrote:not good enough. nothing in 495 demonstrates intent to force a claim. that post is e-1 with the stated rationale of "somewhat sussing flow trap" but "don't know why and can't really explain why, but it seems very odd"-

KittyTacky wrote:

In post 545, team rocket queen wrote:though maybe kittytacky e-1 is fine if kittytacky is just thinking force claim tos style, hammer or move on

Yup this is it. Maybe it's a mindset difference but where I come from... Not claiming when pushed by half the town is extremely sus.

but now it's "extremely sus". this is not to mention that you were hesitant to E-2 them earlier. this is also not to mention that their refusal to claim when pushed by half the town (not including your push of their PR earlier) happened *after* your vote

I said I tried to force him to claim before my E-1 so your point is moot.

That wasn't half the town earlier, that was mainly just you.

In post 670, team rocket queen wrote:kittytacky these recent posts feel like 'just want flow trap hammered', which flow trap will say happy unbirthday boon is the same but does it really

feel

like happy unbirthday boon is not doing a thing because to me it really

feels

like happy unbirthday boon is doing a thing which makes town the more likely option

In post 672, KittyTacky wrote:I'll stop pushing if they claim because they're being quite sus. Isn't not claiming when asked to at E-1 practically just saying "kill me"?