Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 4:53 pm
I tried to follow your train of thought, misty's train of thought in 510, her initial post in 500, and the post she quoted as "your original push on her" which was just you saying you felt motivationless and I do not understand how any of that is resulting in a townread on mistyIn post 645, Infinity 324 wrote:Basically I had this idea where mistyx would not force thoughts if she didn't have any as town where she would force them as scum. It doesnt look like that was correct, but I finished townreading her for 510 which I felt like she would've presented differently (perhaps not even quoting my post) if it was both wrong and fake as opposed to just wrong.In post 639, Venus Fly Trap wrote:I still think infinity/leafeon interactions feel weirdly weak. infinity's line of questioning on "do you post like this as scum" etc doesn't seem like it's really meant to go anywhere meaningful and ends with her soft-townreading leafeon. I don't see how misty's responses were particularly towny.
this is ridiculously partnery as wellIn post 530, Infinity 324 wrote:@beeboy I know you just said you don't like readslists but scum are gonna figure out who I SR anyway, and I think this is important
{bulge, DC, NM, mom, nacho, cakez}
tell me about your infinity read? or link if you've gone in depth recently?In post 117, Kismet wrote:In my heart of hearts I want to believe that Infinity, VFT and I have all found each other early; Infinity is probably the closest thing I have to a proper townread atm, and I generally like how skitter is approaching the nacho read overall.
can you elaborate on what you were talking about here? why/how was it looking good for him?In post 163, Infinity 324 wrote:Also we can read NM based on who's pushing and defending them. Were more likely to get earlier scumflips in this setup that most
So far it's looking pretty good for NM
what's the context?In post 173, Venus Fly Trap wrote:Mena we've talked abt this like 6 billion times already but i really kinda fundementally disagree with u abt ur approach to not mafia
But, i do think the frustration you're exhibiting on this page given the context is townie for you
~ skitter
why not?In post 241, SirCakez wrote:I think Nacho's play has been bizarre but I don't think this is in the realm of possiblity.In post 101, Venus Fly Trap wrote:tbh I'm kind of thinking scum!nacho is getting his buddy NM out of the way so that he can direct a nightkill onto a townie of his choice rather than only being able to kill a miselim-able townie during the day.
- lilith
In post 639, Venus Fly Trap wrote:okay nvm I started reading and my brain can't stop
I still think infinity/leafeon interactions feel weirdly weak. infinity's line of questioning on "do you post like this as scum" etc doesn't seem like it's really meant to go anywhere meaningful and ends with her soft-townreading leafeon. I don't see how misty's responses were particularly towny.
- lilith
what do you two think about kismet's part in the interaction then?In post 640, The Bulge wrote:hey wow I was just reading that part and thinking exactly the same thing
Nacho wanting to lim them, skitter and kismet notIn post 660, The Bulge wrote:can you elaborate on what you were talking about here? why/how was it looking good for him?
But I'm here and I can talk!
Mostly I think nacho is scum and we should lim him and figure out the best from there.In post 669, Momrangal wrote:INFINITY YOU TOO!
What do you think about the game so far?
What do you make of Nacho and cake going after low ballers right off the bat
Por que no los dos?In post 670, The Bulge wrote:hi mom. are you looking for a voice to genuinely catch you up and brainstorm with, or are you doing something else?
@bulge this was the contextIn post 196, Venus Fly Trap wrote:Ya he was pissed at me in that jk++ cuz we were hydra'd and i wouldnt let hjm flip nm and nm was actually scum and he's getting annoyed at me again and idk why he would if he were scum here