Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2021 8:03 am
truth be told if strange flips scum i think std is with them.
In post 637, Lukewarm wrote:And? Do you have a point?
I don't actively scum read haschel, I just am mainly concerned by his lurking.
No shade intended. I was just pointing out that Haschel got to e-1 in a hurry and you moving your vote brings us back from that edge.
I actively scum read strange at this point, and if she is trying to egg people into hammering haschel, I don't want to leave it at e-1
Very much do not like the vague shade coming from Pav.
Sorry for blank post. Phone acting up.In post 651, Pavowski wrote:In post 637, Lukewarm wrote:And? Do you have a point?
I don't actively scum read haschel, I just am mainly concerned by his lurking.
No shade intended. I was just pointing out that Haschel got to e-1 in a hurry and you moving your vote brings us back from that edge.
I actively scum read strange at this point, and if she is trying to egg people into hammering haschel, I don't want to leave it at e-1
Very much do not like the vague shade coming from Pav.
I will re-evaluate my read on him d1 but hes not getting condemmed d1, so mehIn post 653, cyrus62 wrote:and if lukewarm is scum hockey is with them.
Damn. Condolences, man.In post 640, Haschel Cedricson wrote:I will come back later tonight. My grandpa died 30 minutes ago and that has knocked this down my priority list.
Please don’t kill me before then.
as i said always check those that do not post. but seeing how we just learned rl issues i think we should all unvote till other wise.In post 652, Pavowski wrote:Sorry for blank post. Phone acting up.In post 651, Pavowski wrote:In post 637, Lukewarm wrote:And? Do you have a point?
I don't actively scum read haschel, I just am mainly concerned by his lurking.
No shade intended. I was just pointing out that Haschel got to e-1 in a hurry and you moving your vote brings us back from that edge.
I actively scum read strange at this point, and if she is trying to egg people into hammering haschel, I don't want to leave it at e-1
Very much do not like the vague shade coming from Pav.
No shade intended, I was just pointing out that Haschel had gotten. To e-1 too fast for my tastes, and you moving your vote brought us back from that ledge
huh . im doa so dont bother.In post 655, HockeyFan wrote:I will re-evaluate my read on him d1 but hes not getting condemmed d1, so mehIn post 653, cyrus62 wrote:and if lukewarm is scum hockey is with them.
so quick why 1st you defended them. then you bus them? your a odd one.In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:willing to hammer strange but i want to give haschel some time
Okay, first of all, I did NOT say to not give Town reads. Reread post #69. I pushed for scumreads over town reads, but did not tell other people not to give out their town reads, just stating what I was thinking about said scenario. Implications on what I mean have been generally your basis for your scumreads, from what I can tell, when normally I make decisions based off logic and how people act. Another fact is, I've been trying to gauge people using questions and studying their posts accordingly.In post 649, Lukewarm wrote:I mean yeah. They are my top scum readIn post 647, cyrus62 wrote:i feel seeing where lukewarm top scum read flips . you can learn alot about lynches . luke has been pushing him for a bit now.
Telling other people not to give out town reads. Telling people they should focus on scum reads, but then not having any scum reads of their own. Lots of posts without actually saying very much - like look at their iso, it is almost all defended themselves- Then this recent bit with Haschel
No, he's double voting again.
Sorry to hear that. And that definitely takes precedence over the game, so don't feel too rushedIn post 640, Haschel Cedricson wrote:I will come back later tonight. My grandpa died 30 minutes ago and that has knocked this down my priority list.
Please don’t kill me before then.
you ment d2 right? funny how you act that way.In post 655, HockeyFan wrote:I will re-evaluate my read on him d1 but hes not getting condemmed d1, so mehIn post 653, cyrus62 wrote:and if lukewarm is scum hockey is with them.
Yes I meant d2, sorry the typo. and also what do u mean "funny how I act that way" ??. Do you really think Luke is the scummiest person atm cause I dontIn post 670, cyrus62 wrote:you ment d2 right? funny how you act that way.In post 655, HockeyFan wrote:I will re-evaluate my read on him d1 but hes not getting condemmed d1, so mehIn post 653, cyrus62 wrote:and if lukewarm is scum hockey is with them.
hmmm and why not you said you moved him to null but here you go defending.In post 671, HockeyFan wrote:Yes I meant d2, sorry the typo. and also what do u mean "funny how I act that way" ??. Do you really think Luke is the scummiest person atm cause I dontIn post 670, cyrus62 wrote:you ment d2 right? funny how you act that way.In post 655, HockeyFan wrote:I will re-evaluate my read on him d1 but hes not getting condemmed d1, so mehIn post 653, cyrus62 wrote:and if lukewarm is scum hockey is with them.