Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:58 am
As to your other question*
On second thought this is actually a weird question.In post 647, Kazyan wrote:Also, should we consolidate wagons?
Okay, then please quote where you have explained your logic. But in a way that's deeper that "*quotes a random post* - this is a Townie thought process". Because I went looking for your reads specifically yesterday, I didn't find much.In post 608, GrandpaMo wrote:Naathan has not even come up with a good scumcase on me either just because I haven't explained my logic. When I have multiple times -- in which I responded and never got a response back -- explained to them.
Me looking at your ISO was only to see if you actually have reads as you had claimed, I said as much. However, in my skimming, I got the feeling that the vast majority of the posts I skipped were posts like "I'm bored/lazy", random setup specc, or otherwise useless posts that don't actually show much of your mindset.In post 609, GrandpaMo wrote:Okay this proves my point. You haven't read my iso -- and have not fully analyzed my mindset. This obviously leads to confbias into pinpointing specific posts (after people have scumread me) to scumread me for and never see a town motive for them. I suggest you doing that + looking at my past games before indulging into my point even more.
Why is Ythan in your Townreads?In post 643, Dwlee99 wrote:Ythan
I mean, I went through his ISO yesterday looking specifically looking for his reads and explanations for those, after I was told to do that as he's apparently already posted them. Now, I have been feeling like shit the past few days so I will admit my mistake if I am that blind as to not having seen them, but when the "I've already explained them and I'm not getting a response" keeps repeating... I don't know.In post 655, Ythan wrote:Pointing to your iso and saying "I've already explained this" (if this isn't demonstrably true) and refusing to engage is a scum tell I actually believe in.
He feels natural cause he is talking like I see him do outside of mafia
Sat down for 10 minutes to reread his ISO. This never happened. The only read that has been explained is the Ythan one. Andres/Kyouko/whoever else had been given weak reasons by quoting a post and calling it Townie. Either we're talking way past each other on what is he referring to as responding or explaining, or this is a lie.In post 608, GrandpaMo wrote:Naathan has not even come up with a good scumcase on me either just because I haven't explained my logic. When I have multiple times -- in which I responded and never got a response back -- explained to them.
Do you know if Scum!Ythan has trouble faking his casual tone? Cause if not, that doesn't sound like a great reason to Townread someone.
It sounds like you don't townread ythan? It isn't the best reason necessarily but it's good enough for me to have him higher than the people lower than him and I don't see a reason to have him lower.In post 660, Nathann wrote:Do you know if Scum!Ythan has trouble faking his casual tone? Cause if not, that doesn't sound like a great reason to Townread someone.
I don't Townread him, I've been saying that for... a while now. His push on geraintm way back pinged me wrong, and the rest of his posts didn't impress. Though, to be fair, this read is probably due for a reread on my part. That's most likely not happening Today as time is running low, there's not a lot of people that would want to vote him, and I'm feeling a bit lazy and don't feel like doing things that I don't have an immediate use for.In post 661, Dwlee99 wrote:It sounds like you don't townread ythan? It isn't the best reason necessarily but it's good enough for me to have him higher than the people lower than him and I don't see a reason to have him lower.In post 660, Nathann wrote:Do you know if Scum!Ythan has trouble faking his casual tone? Cause if not, that doesn't sound like a great reason to Townread someone.
In post 649, Ythan wrote:As to your only question the only wagon with two votes besides Gramps happens to be those exact two players. On Andres who is posting mad content.
To actually answer you though obviously yes.
I mean, we have a lot of players who have gone practically silent, so we kinda need a huge majority of active players cooperate to avoid a no-lim today, not just n/2 + 1. VOTE: GrandpaMo. Andre, if you're scum, you're really good at providing scumcases on people.In post 651, Ythan wrote:On second thought this is actually a weird question.In post 647, Kazyan wrote:Also, should we consolidate wagons?
In post 663, Kazyan wrote:Kyo, if you're out there, please hammer.
These posts being 7 and a half minutes apart sure is A Look.In post 665, Kazyan wrote:I do not love this gamestate. Nixie, AliceK, and gerantim (to a lesser extent) are off in space, and Enchant is one step above active-lurking. The game is going to be unwinnable if that persists; I actually think I want to yeet a lurker today instead of GMo, if there's enough political will left in the town. Does that sound agreeable?
lol I feel that. Wrt the push on gerain though, I didn't really find it AI cause I think town are likely to scumread the way he plays but if he is town he is also LHF sort ofIn post 662, Nathann wrote:I don't Townread him, I've been saying that for... a while now. His push on geraintm way back pinged me wrong, and the rest of his posts didn't impress. Though, to be fair, this read is probably due for a reread on my part. That's most likely not happening Today as time is running low, there's not a lot of people that would want to vote him, and I'm feeling a bit lazy and don't feel like doing things that I don't have an immediate use for.
Because I think it is best for town, we go into day 2 only 1 townie down and a bunch of night actions to help us tomorrow, rather than killing one of us
-> A 2v11 game with a confirmed Innocent Child.In post 672, geraintm wrote:a bunch of night actions to help us tomorrow