Mafiascum.net

In post 581, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 324, T3 wrote:

In post 262, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?

TSTBS

Not exactly.

I never played with

meme

Titus

before, do you?

In post 651, Save The Dragons wrote:T3 hasn't done anything crazy yet...

In post 589, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 364, T3 wrote:

In post 37, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 29, Gamma Emerald wrote:lul
PEdit: interesting, I feel like in past games you’ve used a “guilty until proven innocent” approach with me, am I wrong? If I’m right, why the flip in tactics?

You're right, I guess that's just how I look at everyone by default?
And cause I feel like it

In post 42, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 41, marcistar wrote:

In post 39, T3 wrote:marcistar anagrams to "Arm rats IC"
Naturally you are a rats arm who also rolled IC.

shh thats a secret for now yknow?

Hey I'm a hidden IC too!

In post 148, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 138, T3 wrote:Titus is being so overtly strange that I'm tempted to just call it NAI?

How? I've played with titus a bunch and she doesn't really seem abnormal to me thus far

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

In post 344, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 206, Galron wrote:

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

What is it that you see?

Just seems like their sorting has been artificial to me

In post 227, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.

lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true

eh its usually means it. im not arguing with you anymore regarding this -- i swear this SHIT HAPPENED IM GETTING DEJA VU LOL

WE WERE LITERALLYT BOTH TVT TUNNELING EACH OTHER FOR PETTY SHIT LOL

why would you jump to TvT here? seems very odd

In post 258, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 257, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 223, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 215, GrandpaMo wrote: ur questioning me regarding why i said that was a bread crumb but you replied to gamma regarding rolefishing. if you know that gamma was tryna rolefish > then you my narrative is correct that you do believe it was a bread crumb. do you understand? or do you want me to simplify it easier for u? its basically like a logic gate.

lol? I mean you're just assuming that just because I question soemoen else on why THEY know/want to know the "breadcrumb" and why THEY care doesnt mean i think its a breadcrumb? Me not seeing the "breadcrumb" and me questioning someone on someone whos fishing for that breadcrumb can both be true

I don’t think I’d need to ask if there was an actual breadcrumb
I moreso asked because I didn’t see it and scum are generally the ones who’d look out for them so I wanted to put GMo on the spot

if you didn't see it. and people have claimed they haven't either. and i said its a breadcrumb, then wouldn't that make me town? since what titus said not a breadcrumb from ur pov?

for someone who said they were moving on from this you sure haven't

In post 288, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselves

Are you

Not_Mafia

?

I'm a hectic alt

In post 299, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 83, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 80, Titus wrote:Townbinning Gamma.

SCUM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE FOCUS ON ME DOING THIS TO EARLY TOWNBIN A BUDDY HMMMMMMMM?~?!!?

Is this post serious?

Don't try me.....

In post 327, T3 wrote:I did some metadiving of sb9 last night but forgot to post it.

Don't bother no amount of work will get your scumbutt off the hook

These are all town Superb Owl 9 posts.

Ok

T3

is scum.

UNVOTE: sb9

VOTE: T3

In post 19, Save The Dragons wrote:OMG I just realized my name has the initials STD...well...I knew it had those initials...but I just remembered what else has those initials

In post 636, marcistar wrote:

In post 570, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 201, superbowl9 wrote:Agreed galron I smell something fishy about T3
VOTE: T3

UNVOTE: Titus

VOTE: sb9

wtf is ur thought process here..?
567 you have

"Titus/T3/?"

as your team, you then see superbowl vote t3 and vote them instead..?

In post 636, marcistar wrote:

In post 586, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 349, marcistar wrote:VOTE: roden

Huh? (2)

its a good vote, you should join me on it.

In post 640, Titus wrote:I think SF is scum with HockeyFan or Roden but not both.

Thoughts DGB?

In post 657, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 640, Titus wrote:I think SF is scum with HockeyFan or Roden but not both.

Thoughts DGB?

Why don't vote me then?

In post 644, Galron wrote:

In post 615, Salsabil Faria wrote:(their wagon formation seems off)

What's this about?

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

In post 659, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 644, Galron wrote:

In post 615, Salsabil Faria wrote:(their wagon formation seems off)

What's this about?

The way

Kop

's wagon was formed without resistance.

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 661, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go

In post 660, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read

DGb

?

In post 663, T3 wrote:

In post 661, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

I dont think so either but if that's your entire content you need to go

Dunno man, what if we have DGB as an IC by meta who we don't eliminate.

In post 666, Save The Dragons wrote:dgb gives content i don't know why you want to policy it

In post 664, T3 wrote:

In post 660, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 645, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

In post 641, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 639, marcistar wrote:

In post 638, superbowl9 wrote:^We might as well get rid of this slot if this is all of the content it's gonna produce

do u scumread them at all

Nope

btw wtf is this sequence lol. I dont think theres anythign wrong with DGB giving blanket reads

Can you read

DGb

?

I can. (she's town)

In post 670, superbowl9 wrote:naked reads are not content

In post 667, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 666, Save The Dragons wrote:dgb gives content i don't know why you want to policy it

such as?

In post 392, DrippingGoofball wrote:Superb Owl 9 should have an owl avatar.