Mafiascum.net

I like the use of the term cowardly.

Not that i agree at all, but it’s amusing.

In post 648, Nero Cain wrote:

@margot

Spoiler:

how is it? I don't know if I wanted to spend the $40...do you think its worth it? Did you get it on cpu or X-box?

Dwlee99 wrote:It's cowardly to vote an inactive slot when you think a bunch of active slots have town told? Okay

I wouldn't call it cowardly. I would call it foolish to vote someone who hasn't spoken up yet.
If someone hasn't spoken yet, then what will voting them do? They haven't been active yet, so why vote them? You have literally nothing to base it on, as irregardless of alignment, some players will just be more inactive than others.

In post 653, Loftwing wrote:

Dwlee99 wrote:It's cowardly to vote an inactive slot when you think a bunch of active slots have town told? Okay

I wouldn't call it cowardly. I would call it foolish to vote someone who hasn't spoken up yet.
If someone hasn't spoken yet, then what will voting them do? They haven't been active yet, so why vote them? You have literally nothing to base it on, as irregardless of alignment, some players will just be more inactive than others.

You just said you think most scum are in the lurkers. Why are you now criticizing someone for voting lurkers?

We live in a society

In post 654, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 653, Loftwing wrote:

Dwlee99 wrote:It's cowardly to vote an inactive slot when you think a bunch of active slots have town told? Okay

I wouldn't call it cowardly. I would call it foolish to vote someone who hasn't spoken up yet.
If someone hasn't spoken yet, then what will voting them do? They haven't been active yet, so why vote them? You have literally nothing to base it on, as irregardless of alignment, some players will just be more inactive than others.

You just said you think most scum are in the lurkers. Why are you now criticizing someone for voting lurkers?

You misunderstood me, or you misread what I said. Someone who has posted 0 or less times is null. There could be a variety of reasons why someone has yet to post and, more importantly, hasn't asked to be replaced yet. Starting a mob against them for doing nothing won't make them appear any more quickly, it will just get them axed faster, regardless of alignment. Do you really think it wod be wise to kill someone from which you know nothing about?

Dwlee didn't vote a lurker, he voted for a nonposter. Lurkers are those who can post more, but have so far failed to. I am scrutinizing Lurkers, not nonposters.

It is a very fine distinction that I made, but I am still aware of the distinction made.

In post 643, Wake1 wrote:

In post 632, DkKoba wrote:

In post 630, Wake1 wrote:

In post 628, DkKoba wrote:I mean like i dont think its a good move I just think how dwlee arrived at it comes from town (in my very convoluted theory)

Um, could you un-convolute that theory, please?

rain check pls

Sure, but then when would you like me to remind you, Koba?

In post 644, Wake1 wrote:

In post 635, Dwlee99 wrote:LQ's post does the same thing to me it's just like dwlee is town or scum oh well

To be frank with you Dwlee you're feeling a little cagey to me and I just wanted to get your insight on how it's going over there.

You know, I'm getting a bit tired of people not responding back to me when I ask questions and point things out.

In post 656, Loftwing wrote:Someone who has posted 0 or less times is null.

Can someone actually post in a negative count???

So far you've posted -31 times.

So I'm null to you?

No, just a satirical replacement for an actual player.

In post 657, Wake1 wrote:

In post 643, Wake1 wrote:

In post 632, DkKoba wrote:

In post 630, Wake1 wrote:

In post 628, DkKoba wrote:I mean like i dont think its a good move I just think how dwlee arrived at it comes from town (in my very convoluted theory)

Um, could you un-convolute that theory, please?

rain check pls

Sure, but then when would you like me to remind you, Koba?

In post 644, Wake1 wrote:

In post 635, Dwlee99 wrote:LQ's post does the same thing to me it's just like dwlee is town or scum oh well

To be frank with you Dwlee you're feeling a little cagey to me and I just wanted to get your insight on how it's going over there.

You know, I'm getting a bit tired of people not responding back to me when I ask questions and point things out.

Wake be trying to solve and the player base isn't having it. These are perilous times.

In post 662, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 657, Wake1 wrote:

In post 643, Wake1 wrote:

In post 632, DkKoba wrote:

In post 630, Wake1 wrote:

In post 628, DkKoba wrote:I mean like i dont think its a good move I just think how dwlee arrived at it comes from town (in my very convoluted theory)

Um, could you un-convolute that theory, please?

rain check pls

Sure, but then when would you like me to remind you, Koba?

In post 644, Wake1 wrote:

In post 635, Dwlee99 wrote:LQ's post does the same thing to me it's just like dwlee is town or scum oh well

To be frank with you Dwlee you're feeling a little cagey to me and I just wanted to get your insight on how it's going over there.

You know, I'm getting a bit tired of people not responding back to me when I ask questions and point things out.

Wake be trying to solve and the player base isn't having it. These are perilous times.

These fuckers I tell you.

Nobody is solving here on my watch.
Only fluff and memes please.

I think some are if you look closer.

644 isn't a question my guy

In post 666, Dwlee99 wrote:644 isn't a question my guy

On the contrary, it doesn't have to be.

It's an observation: something pointed out.

I would appreciate your feedback.

Dwlee, why are you being so cagey?

Almost all your posts are one-liners and you're barely playing the game.

in this game right now?

Totally missed the game start, and have 27 pages to catch up on. I'll do that over the weekend as I have work today and won't catch up all together.

But the last page and a half I quickly glanced over, I have always thought activity is generally NAI. Majority of the games that I have participated in, a lot of the time the low key posters that I have seen eliminated have been town. But yeah, I do agree that it's hard to get a read on players who haven't been active a lot and could be lurking, but there's a difference between lurking and being non active.

I will promise to catch up all together over the weekend and will start to perform once I'm fully up to speed.

Wake if you clicked the ISO button you would have seen that I've given a poe. If you wanna ask about that, go for it, but I'm not answering to give "insight on how it's going over there" when I already gave a poe I'm working from

ok nee is town lol

[]