Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2021 2:22 pm
I remember you said you didn't read though
...okay, so why am I the scum in this "interaction" again...?In post 649, Noraa wrote:The interaction is unsettling in the sense that you are directly SRing while redtea is indirectly SRing. This interaction is just very scummy and likely SvT
TvT doesn't look like this. There is almost always a back and forth that is direct and straight forward for TvT
SvS always looks more natural than this. These are much harder to catch.
Makes the most sense as SvT
I did not read prior to joining in. I caught up in the ~1.5 hours as this game was short.In post 650, Noraa wrote:I remember you said you didn't read though
Nope, it does matter. You just tried to derail the redtea wagon, so you have to own up to that.In post 654, Noraa wrote:i already answered this and either way it doesn't matter. if you are town, you believe redtea will flip scum so you have nothing to worry about.
Purpose of what? Replying to someone who voted me?In post 657, Noraa wrote:i dont get what the purpose of this even was from town you
ok i will explain more in depth if redtea flips scum. for now, i can believe what i want and i believe he is town.In post 656, Vulture wrote:Nope, it does matter. You just tried to derail the redtea wagon, so you have to own up to that.In post 654, Noraa wrote:i already answered this and either way it doesn't matter. if you are town, you believe redtea will flip scum so you have nothing to worry about.
scummy interactions always have scum. this read has only failed me once in the past. it is one of my few reads that have been correct throughout games and if you're scum, you know exactly why you're scum.In post 655, Vulture wrote:and why it is my fault that their lack of rebuttal to me makes me scum.
Instead you just asked me why like three times and I replied three times. What do you get from that as town???In post 658, Vulture wrote:Purpose of what? Replying to someone who voted me?In post 657, Noraa wrote:i dont get what the purpose of this even was from town you
Pray tell, what am I supposed to do if not that?
go ahead. it makes perfect sense to me.In post 660, Vulture wrote:Maybe I should have taken a leaf out of redtea's book and have just called everything you said stupid.
No, I don't. Lay it out for me because I have yet to understand why you're putting the weight of redtea's inaction and words on my alignment.In post 661, Noraa wrote:scummy interactions always have scum. this read has only failed me once in the past. it is one of my few reads that have been correct throughout games and if you're scum, you know exactly why you're scum.In post 655, Vulture wrote:and why it is my fault that their lack of rebuttal to me makes me scum.
What do I get from interacting from someone calling me scum for poor reasons? The ability to have them explain their mindset and point out the poor reasons and have people recognize what they are saying.In post 662, Noraa wrote:Instead you just asked me why like three times and I replied three times. What do you get from that as town???In post 658, Vulture wrote:Purpose of what? Replying to someone who voted me?In post 657, Noraa wrote:i dont get what the purpose of this even was from town you
Pray tell, what am I supposed to do if not that?
your red role pm would be the reason....In post 664, Vulture wrote:No, I don't. Lay it out for me because I have yet to understand why you're putting the weight of redtea's inaction and words on my alignment.In post 661, Noraa wrote:scummy interactions always have scum. this read has only failed me once in the past. it is one of my few reads that have been correct throughout games and if you're scum, you know exactly why you're scum.In post 655, Vulture wrote:and why it is my fault that their lack of rebuttal to me makes me scum.
"You are scum because you have a scum PM."In post 666, Noraa wrote:your red role pm would be the reason....In post 664, Vulture wrote:No, I don't. Lay it out for me because I have yet to understand why you're putting the weight of redtea's inaction and words on my alignment.In post 661, Noraa wrote:scummy interactions always have scum. this read has only failed me once in the past. it is one of my few reads that have been correct throughout games and if you're scum, you know exactly why you're scum.In post 655, Vulture wrote:and why it is my fault that their lack of rebuttal to me makes me scum.