Mafiascum.net

In post 641, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 632, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 626, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 624, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 620, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 619, Save The Dragons wrote:why do you think it's me

I don't have a super-strong feeling that it is, but how else is Pan getting elimmed?

I think Pan's points against you are not bad though.

do you wanna like talk about it and engage with me

My gut reaction to you voting Why is that I thought it was Scummy. It would be like you doing the same thing to NM. I don't think you need to do that as Town. I think as Town you can find Scum without needing to do a PE.

but i unvoted N_M so it was clearly about the person who wasn't voting and was only asking why to arbitrary questions

i didn't need to do it as town but felt strongly enough about it that i didn't care if why got eliminated and we can just play a fuckin' micro game without them.

Yeah, but in that newbie that we played, didn't you sort of not vote the Null slot that hadn't posted much? That's what I'm drawing from here.

i think i did vote that slot and it's not comprable

i also found scum in that newbie and latched on like in this game

In post 650, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 641, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 632, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 626, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 624, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 620, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 619, Save The Dragons wrote:why do you think it's me

I don't have a super-strong feeling that it is, but how else is Pan getting elimmed?

I think Pan's points against you are not bad though.

do you wanna like talk about it and engage with me

My gut reaction to you voting Why is that I thought it was Scummy. It would be like you doing the same thing to NM. I don't think you need to do that as Town. I think as Town you can find Scum without needing to do a PE.

but i unvoted N_M so it was clearly about the person who wasn't voting and was only asking why to arbitrary questions

i didn't need to do it as town but felt strongly enough about it that i didn't care if why got eliminated and we can just play a fuckin' micro game without them.

Yeah, but in that newbie that we played, didn't you sort of not vote the Null slot that hadn't posted much? That's what I'm drawing from here.

i think i did vote that slot and it's not comprable

i also found scum in that newbie and latched on like in this game

You're now latching on to me though?

i can have more than one scum read

In post 652, Save The Dragons wrote:i can have more than one scum read

Okay, well, why am I Scum?

quick is blatantly town

Party getting started. You're welcome.

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

you complain about gamma not engaging with you yet i had to ask you to engage with me

i don't like your tone mister

i don't like that you're "using data" to force eliminations it's not actually solving the game

i think quick's tone is pretty towny as he's showing extreme smugness and single minded thoughts so yall trying to frame him on what is quick's playstyle as town(gamma should know better btw i am seeing some intentional ignorance from them rn) is pretty big hm.

In post 657, Save The Dragons wrote:you complain about gamma not engaging with you yet i had to ask you to engage with me

i don't like your tone mister

i don't like that you're "using data" to force eliminations it's not actually solving the game

And I engaged with you when you asked me. And my vote wasn't naked like yours mister smarty pants.

My tone is fine. I have a bad tone as Scum and this isn't it.

And yeah, I'm using data... I gave an example where the data was correct. You were actually a part of that game.

I don't believe your Scum read on me.

btw the first and 3rd reasons STD listed are scummy reasons to push someone if used on their own. good players will understand why.

In post 649, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

Not at all. You're dealing with a one-of-a-kind player here. I have very obscure reasons for my reads. It's a hallmark of my play.

But sure, how are GMo and I the same? This is just a really terrible read. I still TR you but this is just bad.

The same criticism you had of my questioning in ln 235 was repeated by GMo in mini 2234, that’s what I’m saying is similar between you
There could be more as well but that’s the notable bit

i'm not saying using data is bad, i'm saying you're using data as the sole basis to push your elimination is bad, you didn't try to read pan or i you just decided an argument is usually TvS so we should get rid of both of them that's not solving

drawing info from past games is actually +town because its shows a higher level of cognition

you can argue quick is wrong from your pov.

quick has been a circus performer in games before


but i know that doesnt mean he is always wrong - as I am currently agreeing with him. (plus last time we played we did agree on kyouko)

In post 658, Pan Smierc wrote:i think quick's tone is pretty towny as he's showing extreme smugness...

I don't think I have been smug at all fwiw.

I still think one of either you or StD is Scum. That read is probably not going anywhere soon.

In post 661, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 649, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

Not at all. You're dealing with a one-of-a-kind player here. I have very obscure reasons for my reads. It's a hallmark of my play.

But sure, how are GMo and I the same? This is just a really terrible read. I still TR you but this is just bad.

The same criticism you had of my questioning in ln 235 was repeated by GMo in mini 2234, that’s what I’m saying is similar between you
There could be more as well but that’s the notable bit

VOTE: Gamma

back to e-2 you go

In post 662, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm not saying using data is bad, i'm saying you're using data as the sole basis to push your elimination is bad, you didn't try to read pan or i you just decided an argument is usually TvS so we should get rid of both of them that's not solving

Okay, that's just blatantly false.

In post 655, LicketyQuickety wrote:Party getting started. You're welcome.

this is most definitely smugness but if not its at the very least ego fueled which is just a semantical difference to me

where have you analyzed pan and i outside your data

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:where have you analyzed pan and i outside your data

I said pan was slippery once and I said they were slimy another time.

In post 669, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 656, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 648, Gamma Emerald wrote:And I think based on GrandpaMo also bitching about my aimless questioning in the game I referenced, GMo and LQ are actually comparable players for me

u are intentioanlly ignoring my next post where i say its NAI for gpamo lmfao

Don’t buy it
I found scum!GMo in that game in part because he kept badgering me to engage with his questions @ me.

then you got lucky idk what to say lmao, its not a good metric to find scum.

In post 670, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:where have you analyzed pan and i outside your data

I said pan was slippery once and I said they were slimy another time.

and yet you're voting me

because quick understands its NAI for me

why are you shading your scumpartner and voting town