Mafiascum.net

In post 645, Taly wrote:

LLD's

eye is critical, without looking at meta, it seems to be an aggressive solving style. Yeah, solving, I don't think she is scum unless someone within

{Cabd/2 other people I thought of last night but forgot}

Andante

feels like limbait but I did not like 629 because it did not address

LLD's

questions that I also wanted answers to.

Not that I'm worried about solving her alignment I'm pretty confident

Fire

lol leaves most of this plist.

Wait is it even sound to call anyone limbait in this setup? Mmm.

Me sad I've probably townread scum already yzvaoausuajskfiej

In post 569, GuiltyLion wrote:when Ladies need to build enough towncred to get proposed to?

In post 645, Taly wrote:

LLD's

eye is critical, without looking at meta, it seems to be an aggressive solving style. Yeah, solving, I don't think she is scum unless someone within

{Cabd/2 other people I thought of last night but forgot}

Andante

feels like limbait but I did not like 629 because it did not address

LLD's

questions that I also wanted answers to.

Not that I'm worried about solving her alignment I'm pretty confident

Fire

lol leaves most of this plist.

Wait is it even sound to call anyone limbait in this setup? Mmm.

Me sad I've probably townread scum already yzvaoausuajskfiej

In post 644, Andante wrote:

In post 639, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 634, Andante wrote:

In post 631, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Even if you are going to abandon your reads, which is completrlt fair a s I have done it before myself,

Your mindset in having developed those reads is critical for me.

So humor me, won't you? Play along, lemme get into those brain meats and get a better sense of you.

You're trying to lock me into the reads I don't wanna stand by, seriously, this is of 0 benefit to anyone, ughhh

"you joined the wrong game if you didn't want interrogation"
> excuse me? Large theme games. I join for fun, literally take cats vs dogs for example, I was miller, had no clue, basically kept claiming maf all game, and that's all I did. Everyone here is crazy serious, so obviously I'm being more serious here. I'm not doing interrogation stuff though, you can interact with me sure, but at the rate this is going, you're just gonna drag down my mood and make me not want to be here, which I'd rather not have happen. thanks

I'm explicitly not trying to lock you in to anything. You're allowed to change your mind on reads.

But when you state reads, I'm interested in why, even if you think they're wrong. I'm asking questions about that.

Oh, and, I'm sorry but saying things like "you're going to drag down my mood and make me not want to be here" when asked a few simple questions is not going to disuade me. That's weaponizing your emotions to evade a train of questioning, I'm simply not going to let you have that.

You can, of course, refuse to answer, but if you are town, and looking to be townread (which should be your goal) I encourage you to answer when you get a chance. It might shed some insight onto your play.

Because right now you're only showing me defensive and other scummy signs and that's very possible to come from town who just doesn't wanna answer the questions but I'm not gonna be able to townread you off that, assumign you are town.

And another effort to misrep me, I'm not trying to bring emotions into this!! I just wanna keep the good vibes, I seriously don't see the problem with that. How about this, I refuse to answer any and all questions from you (unless I feel like it's a reasonable one/question about my reads)

Also telling me to act more towny? whatever. I literally don't care if I'm townread or not, I'll find scum and that's that, not like I care what people think about me

In post 577, Datisi wrote:i think it's been talked about already, but i dislike 477, specifically the malakittens read. like, at the time of posting that, it had been 8 hours since the game started. that feels WAY too early to slap a "they're not posting therefore scum" sticker on someone, especially considering mala was complaining about the amount of posts, which to me seems like a possible indicator of "i'm too busy right now". the rest of the post is kind of meh, i'm curious why those exact people have been chosen for a readslist i guess.

and 481 is equally bad... like, marci was doing that readslist to help lily apparently. but, if i'm struggling to get into the game and someone does a post like that to help me, my first thought is to actually interact with that post and try to form my own reads and whatnot, and lily just blandly agrees, and she specifically agrees with the one read i find the worst on the list

i feel heartbroken taly doesn't see the towniness in me

not really digging galron, but i guess he gets some points for being the first person to call out lily in 514

554 - hm. agree with not liking RH9's response, not sure i see how guiltylion's post there is strictly bad. so would like an elaboration when you can, @lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?

okay, i made it to where i first started posting. i have... probably too many people i find suspicious and too many people i flat out don't have a read on. guiltylion and lld are probably the only two ladies from whom i felt something resembling townpings.

In post 649, Datisi wrote:

In post 646, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 630, Datisi wrote:ew.

I'mma need you to explain this post, actually.

Your follow up question wasn't... sufficient to explain your reaction, and I'd like to know more.

629 struck me as a very Bad Post. i didn't want to comment more on it though, since you were in the middle of interrogating her and i think there's value in being able to read that discussion uninterrupted. but i wanted to express my dislike anyway, and see if anything comes from it. so here we are.

In post 587, RH9 wrote:

In post 570, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 548, RH9 wrote:We are going to win because Taly is the best but then I remembered that Mafia might try to get rid of you and then I was sad.

am I being too naive in thinking this just feels tremendously fake in an obvscummy way

RH9 do you have any completed scumgames anywhere you can link to?

Don't worry. Slayer's Gambit and WIFOM exists. It just makes everything harder. Especially since I love using Slayer's Gambit as VT and WIFOM as scum.

In post 577, Datisi wrote:@lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?

In post 658, Datisi wrote:my turn.

In post 577, Datisi wrote:@lld. also, do you currently have any preference on who you pair with?

In post 613, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

Firebringer & Andante have paired!

In post 617, Ydrasse wrote:@datisi i didn’t actually notice that he never followed up on that question (galron) which makes it a bit shadier

i’m a sucker for the questions like that though >_> also him calling dragons whimsical later as a kind of read. (i don’t really like galron reads)

In post 662, Galron wrote:

In post 617, Ydrasse wrote:@datisi i didn’t actually notice that he never followed up on that question (galron) which makes it a bit shadier

i’m a sucker for the questions like that though >_> also him calling dragons whimsical later as a kind of read. (i don’t really like galron reads)

The endgame thing? His not responding was a mark in my book. Not going to force an answer.

In post 378, Datisi wrote:

In post 375, Galron wrote:

In post 343, Datisi wrote: (2) i utterly despise endgames

are you anticipating endgaming?

i expect to probably survive until the second game, yeah. why?

In post 654, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So I'll tell you what: If you don't wanna answer questions about your earlier reads, at least do me a solid and come back next time you come back with some good reads and questions on other players.

In post 663, Datisi wrote:

In post 662, Galron wrote:

In post 617, Ydrasse wrote:@datisi i didn’t actually notice that he never followed up on that question (galron) which makes it a bit shadier

i’m a sucker for the questions like that though >_> also him calling dragons whimsical later as a kind of read. (i don’t really like galron reads)

The endgame thing? His not responding was a mark in my book. Not going to force an answer.

oh my god.

In post 667, Galron wrote:

In post 663, Datisi wrote:

In post 662, Galron wrote:

In post 617, Ydrasse wrote:@datisi i didn’t actually notice that he never followed up on that question (galron) which makes it a bit shadier

i’m a sucker for the questions like that though >_> also him calling dragons whimsical later as a kind of read. (i don’t really like galron reads)

The endgame thing? His not responding was a mark in my book. Not going to force an answer.

oh my god.

What's this about?

In post 669, Prism wrote:Very indifferent to recent events, and very low motivation.

RH9's posting lately is closer to his town posting but is just a complete enigma to try and read for alignment.

In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.

In post 672, Galron wrote:

In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.

Yeah. I just missed the response is all.

In post 673, Galron wrote:

In post 672, Galron wrote:

In post 670, Datisi wrote:i'm just annoyed that you said how me not responding was ~a mark in your book~ when in fact it was you who was not responding for a while now.

Yeah. I just missed the response is all.

And "for awhile now" would have been overnight while I was asleep.