In post 616, jjh927 wrote:Scum:
Vivax
Ircher
furtiveglance
Malakittens
elaborate on furtive?
Klick wrote:We should either hammer Ircher or move on imo
I'm interested in pursuing an RCEnigma vote but I don't want to dampen the Ircher wagon for something that might not happen
i just want to hear from bbt (and andres, if he's still playing this game) again otherwise i'm good to go
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
like my comment and the ensuing conversation were prob useless. I just thought it was maybe a little weird that I'm a step above null when he's agreeing with most of my scum reads.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 654, jjh927 wrote:If I was literally just misinterpreting you this whole time why didn't you correct this misinterpretation until someone gave you an out
I think I've been pretty explicit about how I have been interpreting it
Thanks for the out fire, you saved me from drowning
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle
In post 662, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
I was asking how your reads made sense, not defending myself. I still don't know what line you're pushing with this post. You can just call me scum no matter what I say if you want, and never explain your reads, I'm sure it'll go down well.
In post 662, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
I was asking how your reads made sense, not defending myself. I still don't know what line you're pushing with this post. You can just call me scum no matter what I say if you want, and never explain your reads, I'm sure it'll go down well.
What do you think the gamestate is? Is Ircher being miseliminated or bussed? You're trying to have it both ways.
In post 662, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
I was asking how your reads made sense, not defending myself. I still don't know what line you're pushing with this post. You can just call me scum no matter what I say if you want, and never explain your reads, I'm sure it'll go down well.
What do you think the gamestate is? Is Ircher being miseliminated or bussed? You're trying to have it both ways.
And if you just scumread me regardless of Ircher or anyone else, I deserve to know why.
In post 662, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
I was asking how your reads made sense, not defending myself. I still don't know what line you're pushing with this post. You can just call me scum no matter what I say if you want, and never explain your reads, I'm sure it'll go down well.
What do you think the gamestate is? Is Ircher being miseliminated or bussed? You're trying to have it both ways.
I don't think you're getting that the answer is "I don't know yet"
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle
In post 662, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this aside, it's still pretty scummy that you would immediately jump in and try to defend yourself with "But I can't be scum because I scumread Ircher" who might not even actually be scum
I was asking how your reads made sense, not defending myself. I still don't know what line you're pushing with this post. You can just call me scum no matter what I say if you want, and never explain your reads, I'm sure it'll go down well.
What do you think the gamestate is? Is Ircher being miseliminated or bussed? You're trying to have it both ways.
I don't think you're getting that the answer is "I don't know yet"
And do you know why you scumread me? I'm 2nd last, out of 21.
My gut reaction is that you have placed much higher value on broadcasting the fact that you have reads and making sure everyone else knows you have reads than I would expect of town
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle
You hope others will townread you because of your reads, draw attention to them as a defence, and generally seem more preoccupied with ticking that "thing that town players do" box rather than using it as a tool to spur conversation and more accurately place people
At the base level, you appear to prioritise being townread over gaining information with which to eliminate scum.
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle