Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:36 am
643 is a flail defense if I've ever seen a flail defense before.
In post 649, Frogsterking wrote:Dragons please, scum slot IMOIn post 638, Enchant wrote:So, who we killing and why
It's monologuing and parallel communication. Gives you time to double check everything you say and doesn't force you to interact with other players. It makes your slot appear more Townie on a reread than it should and is a very common scum tactic.In post 643, Save The Dragons wrote:why would you attribute that motivation to me being scum?
Enchant may have been joking but that's the vibe I'm getting from your slot. Game isn't moving fast either, so I think all the drama over catching up is just theater.In post 646, Enchant wrote:Imagine catching up only to discover there's 3+ pages which you also need to catch up.
Therefore catching up is pointless exertise.
Honestly?In post 653, KittyTacky wrote:Honestly I can sheep the case on Dragons, it makes sense to me.
ShadedIn post 642, marcistar wrote:rudeIn post 636, Greeting wrote:especially if it's not the player's meta to do nothing every game (which, in my personal experience, is true for marcistar and Toogeloo).
I thought I did that (652)In post 654, Save The Dragons wrote:I feel like you're so dodgy you should be scumreading yourself frogsterking
How about actually responding to me instead of saying bullshit
I asked firstIn post 648, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:whats your read on him
I think he could be scum for some vibes but I'd rather have him post to help confirm or negate those feelingsIn post 647, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:Whats your read on him then?In post 645, Save The Dragons wrote:as far as malcolmtucker goes i'm not a fan but i'm willing to give him a chance to catch up today
Were any of them good though?In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one
YesIn post 661, Frogsterking wrote:Were any of them good though?In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one
I reread and they weren't good. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man straw man fallacy, you're straw manning my case against you.In post 663, Save The Dragons wrote:YesIn post 661, Frogsterking wrote:Were any of them good though?In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one
Try harder
I think you just randomly drew my name out of a hat and decided to double down on it and anyone who thinks you have a case is an idiot no offense
In post 656, Save The Dragons wrote:I don't believe that I'm seriously being scumread for making catchup posts. This isn't even amatuer hour, it's bizarro world.
Stop confirm biasing yourself and actually listen to what I'm saying. Thank you
I'm close to believing this flail because of the word choice but somehow it seems less genuine than MariaR.In post 664, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: frogsterking
This is just unreal there's no way this is legit
In post 662, Frogsterking wrote:I'd like to hear MariaR thoughts on Dragons.
I am not strawmanning you if anything you are strawmanning me by picking and choosing what part of my case is important and what part of my case is just vaguely beneath you.In post 665, Frogsterking wrote:I reread and they weren't good. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man straw man fallacy, you're straw manning my case against you.In post 663, Save The Dragons wrote:YesIn post 661, Frogsterking wrote:Were any of them good though?In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one
Try harder
I think you just randomly drew my name out of a hat and decided to double down on it and anyone who thinks you have a case is an idiot no offense
Also you claimed low activity != scum but there is evidence that there's a correlation. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection MathBlade made a similar objection (and later flipped scum) when I accused him D1 in the large theme you just modded.
I can yes, I'm choosing not to because I believe in my heart you are lying.In post 669, Save The Dragons wrote:Can you take a beat and reevaluate your position or are you seriously dead set on crucifying me for not posting as much as other people while blatantly ignoring other offenders