Mafiascum.net

u know this interaction just screams u don't scumread me right.

to expand on to make more clear:
when you asked would it be helpful for u to respond, it was pretty clear ur purpose or attempts or focus were to change my stance. Which is a strange position to take when you think i am scum, since when does scum change minds. Then next post when i tell you no, you say "sure i understand completely where ur coming from". But you don't take either into saying how this makes me scum either just "yep kind of thought that was case". Like i don't think ur using any of this inform a read on me. We just had an engagement with purpose of persuading a read change.

and like i don't say skitter pls change ur mind here. I am directly challenging the read u have on me. You back down from that challenge and say "well let me convince you that i am town. Instead of me telling you why ur scum".

I don't believe this is town you. Like it can't. Your A and B priorities are all screwed up.

i initially asked you to eleaborate not to give myself things to refute / to attack your read on me, but rather to get a glimpse into how you're forming this read in order to try to gauge if maybe i'm just wrong and this is a real read you have on me

if it isn't something you're going to change your mind on, i'm not going to go through the motions of trying to do so when that wasn't ever my point to begin with

like i think you thougth i went into that trying to change your mind. that wasn't what i was trying to do

That doesn't make sense.

You knew my read previously. This read isn't new. We went over it before, how are you taking an approach of getting glimpse of my read when you knew it this whole time, i only gave you more about it.

Like I don't believe you think this is at anyway possible a fake read. If you at all thought that it was I expect some good fucking arguments from you beyond "not sure if this is a real read" given how you acknowledge my strongest read was on you.

and you aren't going to go through the motions of trying to figure out my read is genuine on you because it won't change my mind? and changinig my mind was never the purpose? Whaat?!?!?! Are you listening to the words your posting.

You realize that is a huge contradiction.

In post 5535, superbowl9 wrote:I mean we're in Eylo if both threads are shooting are we not? Is it massclaim time? I honestly think the crumb detective work and guessing is just leading town astray and we would benefit from clarity here. Ofc if we could wait another day it would be optimal, hence why I think one thread not limming is an option, but if not I think massclaim is a good idea

In post 6553, Firebringer wrote:i only gave you more about it.

fire, this was the point. this is all i wanted out of you. i wanted to see the reasons for the read, because i didn't know them, and as best as i knew you hadn't articulated them in at least a dayphase

it wasn't to change your mind. it wasn't to fight your reasons. i just wanted to know where the read was coming from, and to see if it makes sense as a ~real read~ to me (which is a work in progress, i'll get back to you like later tonight or tomorrow when i look at it again, i'm having a hard time concentrating on this today)

In post 6553, Firebringer wrote:and you aren't going to go through the motions of trying to figure out my read is genuine on you because it won't change my mind? and changinig my mind was never the purpose? Whaat?!?!?! Are you listening to the words your posting.

i was saying that i wasn't going to try to bicker with you abt the reasons for your read, cuz that's not why i asked in the first place. if you had wanted to talk abt it, i would have, but if you don't i don't feel the need to argue against each point

I am fine with talking to you about it. I told you i am not open to changing my mind. so all ur going to get with me is argumentation right now.

i'm not sure if i'm the one who's communicating badly here or not

What am i not communicating properly? You say you don't want to bicker with me. I said well im fine talking to u but i am gonna argue with you if i engage with you cause im not taking an approach that ur town here.

Fire i'm gonna take a break from this convo, i'll restart it later tonight or tomorrow when i'm feeling a bit better and can actually talk with u coherently. I think i might be the source of why this is going awry and why i'm not getting across what i'm trying to say properly but i'm not able to do this better atm

Aside did annie say why they were trying so hard to get to the other thread?

take care of urself skitter.

Ty fire

Annie I think superbowl is wrong about Dunn. And I think he's intentionally wrong because he's scum.

I've been not wanting to interact with you this day because I felt like you were trying to aim AtE directly at me last night. Not my slot. Me. And I feel like you're trying to drive a huge wedge between Dandelion and me, coming out with your scumread on them.

In post 6562, Deacon Blues wrote:And I feel like you're trying to drive a huge wedge between Dandelion and me, coming out with your scumread on them.

why aren't u arguing im doing thaat?

In post 5551, Annie Edison wrote:Cabd.

I tracked dunn to Cabd n1 and Dunn’s a neighborizer.

Cabd crumbed this to me and anyone else paying attention yesterday with crumbs visible from high orbit.

Just stop this fucking paranoia-fueling if you're town.

In post 6564, Deacon Blues wrote:Just stop this fucking paranoia-fueling if you're town.

no

In post 6559, skitter30 wrote:Aside did annie say why they were trying so hard to get to the other thread?

@annie

In post 6563, Firebringer wrote:

In post 6562, Deacon Blues wrote:And I feel like you're trying to drive a huge wedge between Dandelion and me, coming out with your scumread on them.

why aren't u arguing im doing thaat?

Because you have no leverage over my Cabd read, even if you're town. which I'm questioning.

I thought it was very notable though that you came out with your cabd suspicion at almost exactly the same time that Annie started making those rumblings.

In post 6567, Deacon Blues wrote:I thought it was very notable though that you came out with your cabd suspicion at almost exactly the same time that Annie started making those rumblings.

we coordinated that in our pt

scum are looking for crumbs, which is why they shot vanilla townie zmuffinman lmao

In post 5554, superbowl9 wrote:@ deacon why am I scum? How does my play even remotely fit into a scum mindset

Basically everything that peta has pointed up about you day 2 and today.

Also, your arrival in the forwards thread, declaring you're not reading the prior days and didn't follow that thread to speak of before you turnstiled, and yet felt perfectly ok running someone up to E-1 IMMEDIATELY. Also didn't like that you through suspicion on Bell initially and then just...let it go.

the entire way he integrated himself into that thread and started pushing people is flagrantly scummy

and i don't buy for a fucking second someone who is going to hop timestream with a power role approaches it with such incuriosity

he's someone who's trying to get a clean slate by putting himself in a thread thats not looking to read him

I don't hate the idea of mass claim.

If we do that in this thread, I go last. We locked into our claim in the purple neighborhood.

like he was throwing out a scumread on dandelion but now that hes over there hes putting suspicion on dunn because its convenient, eff that