Mafiascum.net

In post 8467, Deacon Blues wrote:

In post 6572, skitter30 wrote:and for the fact that dandelion/you have been controlling a lot of the game - at least from my pov, it feels like a lot has gone down in the hoods that has been hidden (on purpose or not) from everyone else, and it has directed quite a lot of how later days has gone. in particular the spiffeh/sb9 turnstile. it still doesn't make sense to me honestly why there were so many machinations for that to have happened, or what benefit we particularly got out of it. to me, if cabd was town, i feel like we'd have seen more pro-town reads, conclusions, or mechanical outputs than we actually have. i'm aware that this is some level of bop, but he's been directing a lot of this game, and i just still don't see the +town purpose to a lot of what he's doing. maybe i'm just being blind and so i odn't see it. but like maybe you can help me here, by explaining how he's been approaching the game in a +town fashion? like what was he doing to concretely help solve the game in those hoods?

agree that this is worth talking about and involves some collection on my part.

-b

In post 6578, Bell wrote:You've acknowledged that you haven't read me in depth. So any comparison between me and other players seems relatively meh. I don't know which posts you've read and which you haven't,
or which posts you've read in depth that gripped your attention and which haven't.

But your statement underneath all that or rather the foundation of your reads is skewed because you're reading the game haphazardly as available.
It lacks authority, even though you took an authoritative town when comparing me to other players in terms of townieness.

In post 6580, Hench Princesses wrote:Bell I can't believe you didn't comment on my "doctor tennant" joke because that was seriously a good joke. If you don't get it because you haven't seen Doctor Who then that is also something we need to work on

In post 6581, skitter30 wrote:

In post 6578, Bell wrote:You've acknowledged that you haven't read me in depth. So any comparison between me and other players seems relatively meh. I don't know which posts you've read and which you haven't,
or which posts you've read in depth that gripped your attention and which haven't.

But your statement underneath all that or rather the foundation of your reads is skewed because you're reading the game haphazardly as available.
It lacks authority, even though you took an authoritative town when comparing me to other players in terms of townieness.

that is fair.

but i feel like the reasons i ahve for townreading the people i have are fairly strong

, which means i'll probably hit scum in the people i'm not. i do need to refine the reads in the 'outside of townreads' group, but like i said, i'm actively working on it

like i do think that the townreads are something that are fairly accurate/foundational. the not-townreads no, i agree with you that they're not

pedit if that's directed at me i don't know much abt doctor who

In post 6582, Bell wrote:authoritative tone*

Ah man, I just figured out how to say this more concisely, it seems there's pretense behind your positioning.

In post 6576, skitter30 wrote:well, no, i don't necessarily think that. like i can see that being a possibility for why i got yeeted here but i don't know if that was the only or main reason
honestly i'm not entirely sure why it happened.

i do think i was more likely to get yeeted there than here tho, yes

for people i'm townreading here:
- hp is significantly out of their scumrange and i don't think i can vote them this game like ever
-

gypyx is probalby out of their scumrange as well, but not quite as strongly

- unwnd was town, and i'm not as solid on dunn but i feel p good on uwnd and it's enough that i wouldn't vote that slot today

and i'm town
so that's half the thread and so if there's scum i gotta look at the other people
admittedly i don't have super strong reads on everyone else, but that's what i'm working on rn

In post 6585, skitter30 wrote:

In post 6582, Bell wrote:authoritative tone*

Ah man, I just figured out how to say this more concisely, it seems there's pretense behind your positioning.

i'm not sure i know what you mean
and ok if you think i shouldn't have townreads on those people, like, why not?

In post 6591, skitter30 wrote:ok but i don't think i really have experience with you, but i do have a lot of irsthand experience with the others

In post 6526, skitter30 wrote:

In post 6521, Gypyx wrote:you have both brian and bell as scum with the heavy shitfight they got themselves into? please enlighten me on that one

i mean not inherently scum together? i don't think i implied or indicated that i thought they were together

In post 6554, Hench Princesses wrote:Likely scumflips:

Pooky -- seems to be building entire iso around firebringer, almost no reflection on reads, seems night and day from his townplay, the boon push was literally the towniest thing about this slot and that's really saying something
A50 -- As described above, his iso is unengaged and now half filled with austin powers memes so probably scum
Firebringer -- seems like obvious scum to me, I don't really get why anyone is townreading this slot, he has at no point cared about any of his pushes. I kinda liked at one point his thought process about skitter, but at this point given the timing of when he pushed skitter (early d1 and then d3 when numbers were screwy) I'd just as easily see fire/skitter being s/s -- playing very politically, I have more feelings here but don't want to go into more detail, the retracted cop claim is NAI but his solving is scummy

In post 6554, Hench Princesses wrote:even though his posts on their own make me feel like I'm talking to someone who is going to kill me 'later, when I'm no longer of use.'

In post 6554, Hench Princesses wrote:it almost would surprise me for both Dunn and Brian's roles to be town because generally 'has thing that lets you interact with other timeline' veers a little bit more toward bad guys in the movie.