Mafiascum.net

In post 6323, Something_Smart wrote:Because The Split Killed My Wim And I Don't Remember My Reads And Haven't Gotten It Back Yet

In post 6361, Something_Smart wrote:I Am Going To See If I Can Get Back Into This Game Tomorrow

No Promises Though The Post Restriction Is Definitely Not Helping

In post 6565, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 6510, Good Luck Buddy wrote:i tend to agree with SS being scum now. He is distant from game and day 1-2 i think was forgivable but the fact he hasn't gotten traction anywhere is concerning.

I Can't Think Of Any Reason I Might Be Distant This Game Maybe Because RC Keeps Throwing Bullshit At Us

By The Way I Do Think Locking The Hydra PT Is A Terrible Mechanic But I Didn't Know He Had Instructed You Not To Communicate It Was Never My Intent To Tell People To Disobey Him Of Course

Even with the post restriction, you could still try, no one is expecting you to make Mastina-type wallposts or anything.

In post 6698, Cheeky Wings wrote:beetlejuiceing

What's that?

In post 6701, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 6698, Cheeky Wings wrote:beetlejuiceing

What's that?

Suddenly showing up in a thread only when your name is mentioned or more specifically when you’re either being voted or scumread, because that implies active lurking.

In post 6695, Cheeky Wings wrote:Yes but that shouldn’t be an excuse not to try to solve.

It Isn't I Am Still Trying

The Hydra PT Thing Shook Me A Bit Especially Since I Felt Bad About What I Said

In post 6698, Cheeky Wings wrote:Also SS, this looks like textbook beetlejuiceing to me.

Well Yeah Of Course It Was

In post 6663, Cheeky Wings wrote:Nancy since we're dying tonight, should we claim?
~C

Is this a claim? That you will die tonight?

In post 6705, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 6663, Cheeky Wings wrote:Nancy since we're dying tonight, should we claim?
~C

Is this a claim? That you will die tonight?

Cheeky apparently thinks we will but no there’s no other reason for her to think this other than we’re widely tr.

In post 6703, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 6695, Cheeky Wings wrote:Yes but that shouldn’t be an excuse not to try to solve.

It Isn't I Am Still Trying

The Hydra PT Thing Shook Me A Bit Especially Since I Felt Bad About What I Said

It would really help to see some actual evidence of that.

i have never seen something scum attempt to solve in my entire life

In post 6708, Good Luck Buddy wrote:i have never seen something scum attempt to solve in my entire life

And something town?

something town does not exist

GLB claims BP.
No GLB wagon has gained traction since the bp claim despite of scum indications and no credible towncase.
Three options come into mind...
GLB is scum
GLB is pocketed
I think it is 1.

They said they weren't bulletproof but night immune, yet they claim to have received food from GMo. My eyes just glaze over when ever I think about sorting them properly tbh.
~C

The night immune claim is in our split pt for reference. The food receiving claim is after GMo flip in main thread.
~C

here is a very simple logic game u can play if ur not sure of my alignment:
Day 2:
> I claimed receiving food from GMO
> This was also claimed by GMO to send me food cause he was confirming it with me asking me "what food i got"
Day 3:
> I was pushing heavily against gmo yeet.

For you to think I am scum you have to think the following:
1) me and gmo decided to both lie about getting food
2) i decided against yeeting gmo even though given fact 1 his yeet would make me look good (why would scum give food to partner that kills unless its a lie)

Like i know this is role shit argument but my actions don't make sense as a partner with gmo given those actions unless again u think both me and gmo lied about me getting food, and gmo either didn't send food to anyone or i guess was roleblocked or w/e.

So in summary. I am town, unfortunately. Game would be funnier if i was scum.

Now I challenge NK15 to argue against that fact set. Twist the logic and show me the mental gymnastics u can do bud

In post 6715, Good Luck Buddy wrote:Now I challenge NK15 to argue against that fact set. Twist the logic and show me the mental gymnastics u can do bud

No, that makes sense.

GLB, can you elaborate your case on CW?

In post 6717, Not Known 15 wrote:GLB, can you elaborate your case on CW?

?????

In post 6718, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6717, Not Known 15 wrote:GLB, can you elaborate your case on CW?

?????

Towncase.

In post 6710, Good Luck Buddy wrote:something town does not exist

He actually does try to solve as town though, your hydra buddy will attest to that.

Abcdeg

So the case for T3 being town is that scum!attacher would have helped scum!T3 by now and scum!attacher = true because town!attacher would also have helped T3 by now?

Can't town!attacher just have been too paranoid of scum!T3 to enable his role? Can't scum!T3 just be lying about whether they have been helped by scum!attacher?

In post 6601, Cheeky Wings wrote:Noone except Taly claimed their hood was closed from day start AND since Taly claimed that in the thread obviously GMo shouldn't have claimed to be in an open hood. So if the information was already public it doesn't seem like it matters if their scum partners knew or not to claim being in an open hood

Can you point me to when Taly said that? Clearly I missed it

In post 6692, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 6685, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 1767, Deimos27 wrote:I literally cased Gamma's Ircher vote in a neighbourhood and that argument involved indirect soft defense of Ircher's readslist with comments saying e.g. that the readslist was "RVSy" and that the high confidence figures are obviously ironic and to suggest otherwise is "ridiculous".

GLB is not in said neighbourhood

Yet fire's comments were iirc very much in the context of that particular readslist, and they said they thought it was

me

who had a good point about Ircher potentially still being in his town range.

Implies they were communicated the content of my case in a scum PT and misremembered that it was in main thread

Implies guilt

Just found this while going through Deimos' ISO.
VOTE: GLB

I would like to see what Deimos' thoughts are on this.
~C

That potential slip is a factor that has been playing in the back of my head all game wrt GLB. I suppose I am somewhat surprised that NK15 puts so much faith in my account of things, unless they are tr'ing me for something.