Tiiihhhhaaaaah.
mykonian wrote:no, that is what my assumption was. If emp was a scum roleblocker, then I would expect him to claim his real target.
What if the town was one lynch from LYLO and his partner was set up to bus him if necessary?
mykonian wrote:but what you said before that, that you should have said yesterday.
I'd have said it yesterday if it had occurred to me yesterday. Caf's lynch also grants more significance to his interactions (or lack thereof).
mykonian wrote:based on what I thought till now, only emp and DDD remain as scum. I thought spolium highly protown day one, and had the same feeling with nonny.
DDD? You've expressed no real suspicion of him at all, so far. Do you actually have reason to find him scummy, or is this circumstantial evidence?
* Concerning your interactions with caf:
#521 - Six pages in, caf19 is your "most serious target" due to "interactions with dejkha".
#577 - Following 6 posts and a total of five pages of activity, you should "
give
caf
, ddd, zazie a bit more attention from now on
". How did your earliest and most serious suspect slip your mind?
#596 - You provide possible evidence for scum-Caf (but give no indication of your initial reasons for suspicion, oddly).
#602 - You conceded the mistake in #596, and state that the "scum-caf idea" is "gone for the moment". He was your "most serious target" when you started reading. What happened here?
#642 - You reply to caf's Empking vote with a vote on caf, citing Wall-E's criticism. Still no sign of original case for scum-Caf.
#674 - You state that Caf seemed to be "buddying up early to Zaz" (the only indication of your original case, it seems), and that this "counts against caf" (it doesn't count against him until you know Zaz's alignment). Smells like you're adding fuel to the fire.
You've stressed more than once that you consider me the most protown player, and you did so from an early stage in your participation. Was caf's "buddying" much like this?
* Concerning your interactions with Emp:
#535 - You state that Empking should be watched as you had meta on him, and that some of his posts seemed like they were "to place doubt".
#552 - You vote Empking.
#557 - You went so far as to say that this fit Empking's scumplay.
#577 - You unvote Empking, believing his claim
#596 - You suggest caf/emp scumteam
#602 - You concede the mistake in #596, "
scum-caf-idea is gone for the moment. Doesn't make it that Empking is any more likely to be antitown
".
#647 - You express that Empking "has very little against him" and imply that Zaz's claim is not as convincing.
#657 - More Empking defence, you say Zaz is more likely to be lying.
#680 - You think Empking and DDD are likely to be the scum... wait, what?
It seems that you've kept Emp on your scumlist AND enjoying the luxury of defending him while going after the guy whose lynch you've
actually
been pushing for consistently since you joined the game. J'accuse!
TIMMAAHHAHAH! TIM