Mafiascum.net

also in defense of your insane argument against me, scum would not come clean that they were avoiding a mislynch as town like i have, they would try to stick by their insanity

dramonic (Andrius, TheLonging, vezokpiraka, ReaperCharlie, animorpherv1)
Andrius (inHimshallibe, Furcolow, Me=Weird, xvart, Friend)
Friend (Porochaz, Lord Gurgi)
ReaperCharlie (Faraday, ooba)
Furcolow (gandalf5166, zwetschenwasser)
TheLonging (Erg0) (Fixed)
gandalf5166 (Yosarian2)

Furcolow wrote:yosarian you are such a liar
i was voting you on august 30th pretty much before you ever posted

On the 30th, you voted me because I hadn't voted anyone yet. I didn't have a problem with that vote at all; that's a perfectly reasonable reason to vote on day 1.

Of course, that's not why you re-voted me a few days later. That vote looks like OMGUS.

Furcolow wrote:also in defense of your insane argument against me, scum would not come clean that they were avoiding a mislynch as town like i have, they would try to stick by their insanity

So, if you were scum you wouldn't have admitted that you acted in a scummy way by lying in order to avoid being lynched? Sorry, don't buy that kind of WIFOM at all. Basically, unclaiming the way you would gave you, as scum, a lot more flexibility; if you had stuck to a power role claim, you probably would have to claim in more detail tomorrow or so, and that would have got tricky. What you did is exactly what any scum would love to do, if they believed they would get away with it. Whereas there's no reason for town to do any of those things.

Oh whatever. I can see that this wagon is going nowhere. And don't be calling me VI guyzzzzzzzz. I only act this way in larges.

Andrius wagon is bigger + more Alliance people on it.

Where's that picture again... *checks wiki*

But some of us don't live in America.

Also I love how M=W voted Andrius based on a "scumslip" when in fact, it wasn't really a scumslip at all.

ITT my wagon is obviously scum-driven.
I'm still reading.

TheLonging wrote:But some of us don't live in America.

Boo!

And Andrius is scum for many more reasons than that.

RC: I live in America, but not all of us do <_<

And that scumslip isn't even a slip at all, or at least I can't see it the way M=W is seeing it, which means it's complete and total bullshit.

So it's BS just because... you can't see it?

Wow, thanks for reminding me not to bother making a case to YOU ever again

No it's not that the entire wagon is BS, because I can see legitimate points against Andrius. M=W's logic was bullshit because there WAS no scumslip in THAT certain quote, and believe me I tried to see it. It makes the whole wagon a bit weaker. It's why I'm still on dramonic.

You all sadden me. I'd much rather have the kurker die than someone who will actually be posting content.

*pretends to go look up 'kurker' in the wiki*

*links ani to Mavis Beacon and Ainsworth Keyboard Trainer*

I meant lurker.

I know what you meant.

animorpherv1 wrote:You all sadden me. I'd much rather have the kurker die than someone who will actually be posting content.

btw, are you saying that you'd rather have an active scum player trying to insert their agenda into the discussion than a lurker townie?

I'd rather get rid of scummy actives than scummy lurkers

TheLonging wrote:I'd rather get rid of scummy actives than scummy lurkers

qft

Andrius, 671 wrote:The tr;dr response to xvart's post is this:

xvart wrote: One final question: if you seriously thought you found scum with me and weren't simply throwing out random scum reads you thought you could later justify if questioned about it, why didn't you follow up on it? Why didn't you ask me any questions? Why didn't you make a bigger deal out of it?

Because dramonic continues to exist, and I'm *trying* to organize the mass of town players into something cohesive that can actually be used to lynch scum.

Way to take the most insignificant portion of what I said to try and derail my case before other people come in and comment while you finish your homework.

Furcolow, 675 wrote:also in defense of your insane argument against me, scum would not come clean that they were avoiding a mislynch as town like i have, they would try to stick by their insanity

This makes me sick.

gandalf5166, 678 wrote:Oh whatever. I can see that this wagon is going nowhere.

Aim: dramonic

And don't be calling me VI guyzzzzzzzz. I only act this way in larges.

If you are only interested in wagon's going somewhere, why did you choose dramonic over Andrius?

dramonic, 683 wrote:ITT my wagon is obviously scum-driven.

Yes, because it has Andrius' name all over it.

animorpherv1, 688 wrote:You all sadden me. I'd much rather have the kurker die than someone who will actually be posting content.

I would much rather have scum die regardless of activity level.

xvart.

animorpherv1 wrote:I meant lurker.

Please answer my questions.

If I had to pick between Andrius and Dram as scum...



Andrius-scum is fresher in my mind, and this doesn't look like it.

Mr. Flay wrote:

[2]

TheLonging (Erg0)

One of these things is not like the other.

Posting to avoid a prod, big reread ate my free time for a couple of days. I'll be catching up over the weekend.

Porochaz wrote:

animorpherv1 wrote:I meant lurker.

Please answer my questions.

I only saw one. I answered it.

People on dram wagon are a whole lot scummier than the people on the Andrius wagon. That should tell you something, at least.