Newbie 1,276 (Game over!)


Forum rules
User avatar
HerrRudi
HerrRudi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HerrRudi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 223
Joined: August 3, 2012
Location: Wisconsin

Post Post #675 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:34 am

Post by HerrRudi »

Either way, you didn't have a good NK choice, City.

You could kill:
Nhammen: IC, most experience of the players left, but would push vehemently for your lynch today so everyone would draw that connection
Me: I suspect you at the end of D4, and killing me keeps nhammen in, which is bad for reasons stated above.
Jason: That's pretty much auto lose for you
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #676 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:36 am

Post by CityElectric »

Any NK looked bad on me and good on Jason. Good for him that he was the one killing.

Contrary to other people around here, I don't lie. Thing is, this is the third time I feel like I'm watching the entire game crumbling through my fingers. This time I want it to be different.
User avatar
HerrRudi
HerrRudi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HerrRudi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 223
Joined: August 3, 2012
Location: Wisconsin

Post Post #677 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:40 am

Post by HerrRudi »

So what do you do when you're scum then, City?
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #678 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:41 am

Post by JasonWazza »

The reason it looks bad on you city is that because you are scum, there is a difference.
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #679 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:46 am

Post by CityElectric »

HerrRudi wrote:So what do you do when you're scum then, City?

The same as I'm doing now, trying to save the game for my faction. I feel like I'm more likely to give up as scum, though.
JasonWazza wrote:The reason it looks bad on you city is that because you are scum, there is a difference.

Shut up, scum.
User avatar
HerrRudi
HerrRudi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HerrRudi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 223
Joined: August 3, 2012
Location: Wisconsin

Post Post #680 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:48 am

Post by HerrRudi »

My whole point was that it looked bad no matter what, Jason. She is right to say that just looking at the game from the outside, you are in a much better position than her if you were scum than if she was scum. I hope that makes sense
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #681 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:56 am

Post by JasonWazza »

Correct but that is because i'm not scum and have played this game as so.
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #682 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:04 am

Post by CityElectric »

I have no idea how Jason's statement relates to Rudi's... Apart from a misrep and, well, I don't know.
User avatar
StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
User avatar
User avatar
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
Does not Compute
Posts: 12456
Joined: May 6, 2008
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post Post #683 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:56 am

Post by StrangerCoug »

VOTE COUNT

CityElectric (1): JasonWazza
JasonWazza (1): CityElectric
Not voting (1): HerrRudi

With
3
players alive, it takes
2
players to lynch.

Day 5 ends in (expired on 2012-11-10 18:12:51).

Opening flavor will be up shortly.
It's up now.
STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!

Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #684 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:20 am

Post by JasonWazza »

CityElectric wrote:
Paschendale wrote:
Nekoko wrote:Hi everyone! This is my third game in the forums and ever since my first game here,
I became fond of the Random Questioning Stage. It is a way for people to talk more
about substantial things than voting people randomly. So here goes...


Okay, Nekoko likes that RVS isn't just random and wasteful. It brings out meaningful things.


No, that isn't what she's saying. She says she likes RQS as a way to talk more substantial things, as opposed to RVS. If anything, that isn't "RVS isn't just random and wasteful".

Paschendale wrote:
And since I don't go for no-lynches, I will always try to vote the most suspicious player.
Since the day is still young, here is the random vote

VOTE: Paschendale


Right... RVS shouldn't be completely random, and yet here is a random vote. On someone who hasn't even posted yet.


Again, no. She said that she likes RQS better than RVS. That doesn't mean she can't place a random vote.

Paschendale wrote:
Nekoko wrote:For some reason Paschendale reminds me of
classical game so that's why I voted you :P


For a really random reason. Saying one thing and doing another is pretty suspicious. I didn't even base my vote on this originally, but looking back, it looks like laying groundwork for getting away with shoddy logic later on.

Same could be said about you, Pasch. Nice way of misrepresenting Nekoko/JohnnyFarrar (Johnny). You've just earned some scum points.


Hard core defending of meaningless sorts of things that pasch put on nekoko/johnny the scum slot.

CityElectric wrote:
Johnny: not always the best arguments, but he asks good questions. Town.


And an end for johnny's slot as town for good questions.

CityElectric wrote:
Cheery Dog wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Well, everyone seems to be moving away from him.

I'm pretty sure I was the only person that moved away from him and was the last (besides you since you hadn't come in yet) of the people who claimed to have found anything scummy.
I just looked at what other people are looking at - and certainly weren't moving away.
I don't see nhammen's posts as moving away either. (seeing as he hasn't moved his vote)
Wiibox, Johnny & MissMaggot haven't been active enough to have shown any movement either way

How could everyone therefore be moving away from ewo?

I think you might be agreeing with my points a little too much..

Both haven't been posting in a while and I'd need one more vote from someone to lynch ewo. Plus, those votes were old. And, okay, I admit, I was wrong in possibly giving up the ewo lynch. It seems that it still has some potential. I thought it had died. Dunno what I was thinking.


Trying to jump the townie lynch ship, on pretty poor premises.

JohnnyFarrar wrote:
Post 184, City's intro post, is interesting. I'll go through all of it, because I have stuff to comment on.
The first page is empty. Second, he comes to the aid of Nekoko (Me) even though the points made are no longer relevent (they barely were when they were brought up).


Feels like "stop trying to defend me those points don't matter"

Honestly there is defenses of each other all through the iso, this is just some of the early defenses between the 2 that i have noted, due to there almost petty reasoning's to defend.

Herr i honestly feel confident you will do the right thing by the town go ahead.
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #685 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:46 am

Post by CityElectric »

I'm on my phone right now, do I'm not gonna quote that thing, however, Jason, I had no idea ewo was town. I was really surprised by his flip.
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #686 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:51 am

Post by JasonWazza »

this is about you and johnny being partners, what does ewo have to do with that?
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #687 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:56 am

Post by CityElectric »

It's about the 'trying to hop on the townie-lynch ship' part.
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #688 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:58 am

Post by JasonWazza »

no trying to hop off the townie ship, you tried to bail from the ewo lynch when there were others on it, by saying that it had no momentum (when it clearly still did).
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #689 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:02 am

Post by CityElectric »

Oh, so that's what you meant... (I'm sorry, English isn't my first language, and your syntax was a little vague, so...)

Anyhow, I really need a computer to read and analyse your post on more detail, so I'm afraid you'll have to wait for that. I'll probably have something tonight.
User avatar
HerrRudi
HerrRudi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HerrRudi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 223
Joined: August 3, 2012
Location: Wisconsin

Post Post #690 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:48 am

Post by HerrRudi »

Yeah I'm pretty busy but this game will be over by Tuesday night because I just want it out of my system. I'll definitely wait for city to post something.

Jason look at Venrob's first post of this game on Nekoko (scum slot) and his subsequent reaction to how he talks about his vote. Thoughts?
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #691 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:52 am

Post by CityElectric »

Okay, I've got time now. I do want to say that I don't think looking for Johnny's partner is going to help us much, because of bussing and distancing and stuff.

JasonWazza wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Paschendale wrote:
Nekoko wrote:Hi everyone! This is my third game in the forums and ever since my first game here,
I became fond of the Random Questioning Stage. It is a way for people to talk more
about substantial things than voting people randomly. So here goes...


Okay, Nekoko likes that RVS isn't just random and wasteful. It brings out meaningful things.


No, that isn't what she's saying. She says she likes RQS as a way to talk more substantial things, as opposed to RVS. If anything, that isn't "RVS isn't just random and wasteful".

Paschendale wrote:
And since I don't go for no-lynches, I will always try to vote the most suspicious player.
Since the day is still young, here is the random vote

VOTE: Paschendale


Right... RVS shouldn't be completely random, and yet here is a random vote. On someone who hasn't even posted yet.


Again, no. She said that she likes RQS better than RVS. That doesn't mean she can't place a random vote.

Paschendale wrote:
Nekoko wrote:For some reason Paschendale reminds me of
classical game so that's why I voted you :P


For a really random reason. Saying one thing and doing another is pretty suspicious. I didn't even base my vote on this originally, but looking back, it looks like laying groundwork for getting away with shoddy logic later on.

Same could be said about you, Pasch. Nice way of misrepresenting Nekoko/JohnnyFarrar (Johnny). You've just earned some scum points.


Hard core defending of meaningless sorts of things that pasch put on nekoko/johnny the scum slot.

That was more meant to attack Pasch than to defend Johnny.
Jason wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Johnny: not always the best arguments, but he asks good questions. Town.


And an end for johnny's slot as town for good questions.

And that's bad because? And if you're suddenly going to sheep Dog on this one, get out.
Jason wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Cheery Dog wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Well, everyone seems to be moving away from him.

I'm pretty sure I was the only person that moved away from him and was the last (besides you since you hadn't come in yet) of the people who claimed to have found anything scummy.
I just looked at what other people are looking at - and certainly weren't moving away.
I don't see nhammen's posts as moving away either. (seeing as he hasn't moved his vote)
Wiibox, Johnny & MissMaggot haven't been active enough to have shown any movement either way

How could everyone therefore be moving away from ewo?

I think you might be agreeing with my points a little too much..

Both haven't been posting in a while and I'd need one more vote from someone to lynch ewo. Plus, those votes were old. And, okay, I admit, I was wrong in possibly giving up the ewo lynch. It seems that it still has some potential. I thought it had died. Dunno what I was thinking.


Trying to jump the townie lynch ship, on pretty poor premises.

Not this again... I've already said countless of times that that post was terrible, and I can't remember what I was thinking at that point. Got something new?
Jason wrote:
JohnnyFarrar wrote:
Post 184, City's intro post, is interesting. I'll go through all of it, because I have stuff to comment on.
The first page is empty. Second, he comes to the aid of Nekoko (Me) even though the points made are no longer relevent (they barely were when they were brought up).


Feels like "stop trying to defend me those points don't matter"

Could say that to random town as well. Null tell. Also, I don't see where he says that I should stop defending him.
Jason wrote:
Honestly there is defenses of each other all through the iso, this is just some of the early defenses between the 2 that i have noted, due to there almost petty reasoning's to defend.

If there's more, I want to see it. Now.

Thing is, I still think is a scum tell, based on gut and own experience. Trying to discredit the claim which will screw you over as much as possible. Why would town do that?

StrangerCoug wrote:
VOTE COUNT

ewo2 (4): nhammen,
JohnnyFarrar
, CityElectric, Wiibox3
Wiibox3 (5):
JasonWazza
, Paschendale, HerrRudi, ewo2, Cheery Dog

StrangerCoug wrote:
VOTE COUNT

ewo2 (5): Paschendale,
JohnnyFarrar
, Cheery Dog, CityElectric, nhammen
nhammen (2): ewo2,
JasonWazza

Not voting (1): HerrRudi

Also, isn't it strange how a Jason/Johnny team would perfectly fit Johnny's one on-one off strategy?
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #692 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:10 am

Post by JasonWazza »

JasonWazza wrote:
Cheery Dog wrote:
In regards to deliberately withholding information, what do you make of the last post with 'content' from your predecessor?

Venrob wrote:I see things that are about to come, and i wait for them. Surely i will soon know where my vote goes.

(my gut is really really good, im waiting for something to make my vote not random)


yeah my predecessor is an odd one to say the least, from that post i would gather that he didn't have a good scum read on anyone "im waiting for something to make my vote not random" for that part of his line though i don't see how he couldn't have gotten scum reads myself.

I replaced into one of his other games and honestly he gave off the same sort of scummy vibe, which also explains this outburst

Venrob wrote:
FUCKING HELL ITS A FUCKING D1 RVS! EITHER I NO VOTE OR I VOTE! WHAT THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO DO IN RVS!


He kinda got grilled for his RVS in another game: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=22798

Which he also replaced out of.

He was town in said game.

He seems to misunderstand RVS in my opinion and it's more a newb tell then anything.


Herr this is my stuff for Venrob, i'd already mentioned it :P

CityElectric wrote:
Thing is, I still think is a scum tell, based on gut and own experience. Trying to discredit the claim which will screw you over as much as possible. Why would town do that?


No i didn't discredit the claim, i was saying that it is very possible that herr wasn't a protection and that there was a no kill, at the time i didn't see why herr would be a logical kill target.


If there's more, I want to see it. Now.


When did i start having to convince you of yourself being scum?

CityElectric wrote:
Not this again... I've already said countless of times that that post was terrible, and I can't remember what I was thinking at that point. Got something new?


What ignore it because it makes you look scum?



Also with the not wanting to find johnny's partner, you then look at why i am his partner, how does that work?

Not to mention one-on one-off is a pathetic scum tell.
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #693 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:24 am

Post by CityElectric »

JasonWazza wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Thing is, I still think is a scum tell, based on gut and own experience. Trying to discredit the claim which will screw you over as much as possible. Why would town do that?


No i didn't discredit the claim, i was saying that it is very possible that herr wasn't a protection and that there was a no kill, at the time i didn't see why herr would be a logical kill target.

By which you were saying that Rudi isn't likely to be confirmed town and you don't seem to buy Pasch's claim.
City wrote:
If there's more, I want to see it. Now.


When did i start having to convince you of yourself being scum?
[/quote]
Since when can I defend myself on thin air? I take it you haven't got anything.
Jason wrote:
CityElectric wrote:
Not this again... I've already said countless of times that that post was terrible, and I can't remember what I was thinking at that point. Got something new?


What ignore it because it makes you look scum?

Get out. Prove me that you've been reading this thread. I've been over it countless of times.
Jason wrote:
Also with the not wanting to find johnny's partner, you then look at why i am his partner, how does that work?

Not to mention one-on one-off is a pathetic scum tell.

And that's a misrep. I said that it's probably not going to help us much, not that I don't want you to look for it. I'm fine with you looking for it.

Also, VCA and Johnny's words is something different than our interactions.
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #694 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:32 am

Post by JasonWazza »

Actually no i just re-read Post 485, that was nothing to do with what you have linked it to, it was me questioning his play when we hadn't had all the claims yet, so i'm gonna actually quote it here, you can show me how it's a scum tell.

JasonWazza wrote:
Paschendale wrote:
Night 2 was somewhat more complex.
Only two people were on both lynches, me and Cheery.
So I looked at people I thought Cheery might want to kill. I didn't think they'd target Nhammen again, especially since Cheery had been a bit supportive of him. The other person Cheery had been supportive of was Jason. I'm pretty sure Cheery and Jason is our scumteam.

But the one who stuck out was Rudi. Rudi hasn't been so responsive to Cheery. I put myself in the mentality of who I needed around to keep the town lynches going, and who might be a liability. All of this on the assumption of being Cheery. And Rudi was the liability. Actually, I was the liability, but Rudi was second. Since I couldn't protect myself, Rudi was my target night 2. And he's alive, too.


First the bold part, how does that make Cheery scum?

I am all for Cherry's play being bad after yesterday and him being possible scum, but really, because he was on both lynches he is scum?

Paschendale wrote:Well, I don't want him to, as Cheery is one of my two top suspects right now.

City goes next.


Also wouldn't it be better to get cherry to claim next if that was how you felt?

As for the rest of it, so cherry is supportive of me and nhammen, i'm scum but nhammen isn't?

All of your tells are plain wrong (scum had to be on both lynches and being supportive=scum team)

Scum being on both lynches makes you and cherry scum, so that is wrong assuming you really are the town doc, so that tell is wrong by definition so you shouldn't use it, being supportive=scum team is wrong because of a thing called distancing and busing, tell me what benefit scum has of being supportive to there partner?


This is me questioning his reasons for;

a) how cherry was scum based on a tell that covers himself and cherry as scum.
b) Me questioning why you should go next over his scum read.
c) me criticizing that a tell makes me scum and not someone else that could be covered by the same statement (look even a and c are basically the same).

I even use the following phrase


so that is wrong assuming you really are the town doc


Tell me, how is that discrediting his claim?
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #695 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:38 am

Post by CityElectric »

And by discrediting, I mean making the claim sound implausible. But, okay, here goes.

a) Well, he obviously knew his own role PM, didn't he?
b) Yeah, that was weird, I agree.

Also, . "I honestly don't think we should totally confirm the doc saves just in case there was a no kill" Why would you want to make the hunt pool bigger as town?
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #696 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:50 am

Post by JasonWazza »

because i'd rather those not in the hunt pool are 100% town.

a) Yes but i am saying it's not a useful tell because we can't see his PM
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #697 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:55 am

Post by CityElectric »

Wouldn't it just be easier as town to assume all of those are town? I can see a use as scum, though, widening the possible lynch pool. Less chance they hit you. Also, yes, there is a bit of gut involved, which I've mentioned before.

a) It's about him choosing who to protect, so, do we care?

I see you haven't got anything else to say Johnny and I are partners? Fine, noted.
User avatar
JasonWazza
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
JasonWazza
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7598
Joined: August 1, 2012

Post Post #698 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:59 am

Post by JasonWazza »

So you want scum to be able to hide under the radar on a less then 100% chance they are town

a) I'm not allowed to question that?

I do just not yet.
User avatar
CityElectric
CityElectric
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
CityElectric
Goon
Goon
Posts: 718
Joined: June 28, 2012
Contact:

Post Post #699 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:02 am

Post by CityElectric »

I have no idea what you mean by that sentence.

a) Rather not.

Well, you saying there was more was a lie then. Again, noted.
Locked