The aggression towards pitoli looks fake and completely unfounded
That and the joke of a list has me wondering
And what the fuck is wrong with it? Nothing. And all of this is a complete misrep.
The post quoting pitoli was addressed to everyone. I don't think I gave a clear indication one way or the other which way my opinion fell and which one I though was the most likely choice. Thus the hypotheticals. There was no aggression towards pitoli there wasn't even a hint of a FOS. So clean your reading glasses.
I think there's definite scum here because I don't think your reactions to each other are all coming from town.
↑SafetyDance wrote:
Possible scum in: nero, Lurker
I don't like these two and their play styles and their lurking and think its scummy (and Nero is scummy for what he posts too) so can see Scum here.
↑SafetyDance wrote:
No idea: pitoli, Deltabacon, Syryana
This is basically "null". Why? Because most of their postings and interactions are hidden behind PAGES of posts of others and I don't (or didn't) have a definite read on them. Do you accept null reads from others? So how is this different?
That is how I have grouped the playerlist. I'm sure you have brain capacity to understand this.
This post looks kind of bad and also counteracts the town read I had that was based on his anger-vote on me.
In all his bile I don't think he's taken a single shot at me.
VOTE: SafetyDance
I was wondering about this and about why scum-SD wouldn't jump on your wagon. What is your explanation(?), because I'm pretty sure it's not the same as mine.
I love how you list scum inthe three of us and made no effort to push a lynch, or even specify which of us is likely scum, or even list any evidence for why you think our interactions are forced.
I also have no interest in reading your posts which are just you spewing insults on the page. I've tried being nice to you.
You're right why policy when a scum just appeared in front of us
Good lord
I love how you fail TO SEE WHERE MY VOTE IS.
Good work champ. Keep up the delusions, so I should not bother reading your posts as well?
VOTE: orcinus_theoriginal
Oh lol, you've already lied there, what this, not a quoting a post of mine are you?
↑pitoli wrote:Hey guys, just posting quickly after skimming the thread again.
I've got a project due later tonight,
after which you can expect updates on my reads, however murky.
Is this something you find ok? Do you want someone who's hypothetically-town in the game to have "murky" reads that are due to time constraints and having to skim posts? Do you want hypothetical-scum to be able to use "murky" as an excuse for their inaccurate reads?
Asking for help towards clarity, again, is not laziness.
Then you're both reading it wrong and misinterpreting it. The "you" is directed to everyone, as I explained, otherwise it doesn't make sense. Do you find it acceptable that someone can have those sorts of reads with all this logorrhea that is happening?
↑fferyllt wrote:
Any suggestions on how to make it a more productive and less long-winded game day?
↑SafetyDance wrote:...seriously, calm down, go to sleep or walk the dog or something and then come back and post in the thread.
Not being on mafiascum 18 hours a day helps too. This isn't EpicMafia, you don't have to always be refreshing.
↑fferyllt wrote: I have a question up-thread for SD about Nero.
Going back...
↑fferyllt wrote:SD do you have any comment on Nero's intimations about you?
I don't know, I think he's trying to be bullish towards me because I've voted him, think he's play is shit and this is his (shit) way of dealing with it. He's the low-post, egotistical version of others here in the game.
↑Syryana wrote:Yeah, I'm with Orcinus on this one. SD's been super aggressive against everyone for no apparent reason.
Blatant contradiction. Nothing in his "in-between" posts justifies this flip-flop. Forgot he originally had FF as townread. Get the rope.
VOTE: SafetyDance
No there isn't. If I think there's scum IN there, between those three player. I just mentioned this above. I don't think they're all town. If ff is my "town" read out of them then I would start suspecting who? Oh, THE PEOPLE I'M VOTED for. Fancy that.
No reason? I gave the same reason as you did in your update post, I did it in my very first post. There's a lot to get through, I'd have liked it if they tried to slow down and that I wanted their reads of the other two and to try and slow down so other players can get into the game. Then they flew out with the negative reactions and buddying each other.
↑buldermar wrote:
This post looks kind of bad and also counteracts the town read I had that was based on his anger-vote on me.
Oh look a label 'bad' without a reason.
I also find it amusing that you can suddenly town-read someone based on nothing but a vote but not anything they actually say. Would love to hear the logic behind that one too.
I'm putting that in quotations because literally it is too terrible to be the work of even the worst town player.
Like I said his list looks like he just sorted the players according to level of activity. Also, that's an elaborate hidden little insult you have going on there ^^
In all his bile I don't think he's taken a single shot at me.
VOTE: SafetyDance
I was wondering about this and about why scum-SD wouldn't jump on your wagon. What is your explanation(?), because I'm pretty sure it's not the same as mine.
I'm pretty sure I know what your explanation is.
I can think of a few reasons. If the players that were currently under lynch threat are all town then letting town take a policy lynch on some other townie today means that I'm tomorrow's likely mislynch. Also, once I flip I'm predicting a whole lot of finger pointing and recriminations. That's why a couple players distancing from what looks like a town consensus that I'm probably scum is starting to bother me.
I'm putting that in quotations because literally it is too terrible to be the work of even the worst town player.
Like I said his list looks like he just sorted the players according to level of activity. Also, that's an elaborate hidden little insult you have going on there ^^
Touché to both of you if you end up being town as well.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:45 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
That's a giant backtrack and its so obvious I'm going to let somebody else explain it because I'm off to bed
Really quickly though
In post 511, SafetyDance wrote:
Scum in: buldermar, fferyllt, orcinus_theoriginal
I think there's definite scum here because I don't think your reactions to each other are all coming from town.
--
Why would you put ff under "scum in" if you don't think she was scum? It's like me giving a list that looked like
Scum in: [playerlist]
Your anger looks manufactured and its really not helping your case.
Buld: put him to l-1 or give me your reasons why you aren't
And nice OMGUS try to make it slightly less transparent next time, SD. I enjoy how you didn't address much of my post.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:46 am
by fferyllt
↑SafetyDance wrote:Not being on mafiascum 18 hours a day helps too. This isn't EpicMafia, you don't have to always be refreshing.
Insulting? Where I grew up playing mafia that's a fistbump. Didn't even register compared to what you've been dishing out elsewhere.
I'm putting that in quotations because literally it is too terrible to be the work of even the worst town player.
That kinda fits with the 'not here' vibe in a way. I'm almost certainly going to be lynched, though maybe not today. He's distanced himself from that. Nobody else has done so quite that emphatically, except maybe pitoli.
I love how you list scum inthe three of us and made no effort to push a lynch, or even specify which of us is likely scum, or even list any evidence for why you think our interactions are forced.
I also have no interest in reading your posts which are just you spewing insults on the page. I've tried being nice to you.
You're right why policy when a scum just appeared in front of us
Good lord
I love how you fail TO SEE WHERE MY VOTE IS.
Good work champ. Keep up the delusions, so I should not bother reading your posts as well?
VOTE: orcinus_theoriginal
Oh lol, you've already lied there, what this, not a quoting a post of mine are you?
↑pitoli wrote:Hey guys, just posting quickly after skimming the thread again.
I've got a project due later tonight,
after which you can expect updates on my reads, however murky.
Is this something you find ok? Do you want someone who's hypothetically-town in the game to have "murky" reads that are due to time constraints and having to skim posts? Do you want hypothetical-scum to be able to use "murky" as an excuse for their inaccurate reads?
Asking for help towards clarity, again, is not laziness.
Then you're both reading it wrong and misinterpreting it. The "you" is directed to everyone, as I explained, otherwise it doesn't make sense. Do you find it acceptable that someone can have those sorts of reads with all this logorrhea that is happening?
↑fferyllt wrote:
Any suggestions on how to make it a more productive and less long-winded game day?
↑SafetyDance wrote:...seriously, calm down, go to sleep or walk the dog or something and then come back and post in the thread.
Not being on mafiascum 18 hours a day helps too. This isn't EpicMafia, you don't have to always be refreshing.
↑fferyllt wrote: I have a question up-thread for SD about Nero.
Going back...
↑fferyllt wrote:SD do you have any comment on Nero's intimations about you?
I don't know, I think he's trying to be bullish towards me because I've voted him, think he's play is shit and this is his (shit) way of dealing with it. He's the low-post, egotistical version of others here in the game.
↑Syryana wrote:Yeah, I'm with Orcinus on this one. SD's been super aggressive against everyone for no apparent reason.
Blatant contradiction. Nothing in his "in-between" posts justifies this flip-flop. Forgot he originally had FF as townread. Get the rope.
VOTE: SafetyDance
No there isn't. If I think there's scum IN there, between those three player. I just mentioned this above. I don't think they're all town. If ff is my "town" read out of them then I would start suspecting who? Oh, THE PEOPLE I'M VOTED for. Fancy that.
No reason? I gave the same reason as you did in your update post, I did it in my very first post. There's a lot to get through, I'd have liked it if they tried to slow down and that I wanted their reads of the other two and to try and slow down so other players can get into the game. Then they flew out with the negative reactions and buddying each other.
↑buldermar wrote:
This post looks kind of bad and also counteracts the town read I had that was based on his anger-vote on me.
Oh look a label 'bad' without a reason.
I also find it amusing that you can suddenly town-read someone based on nothing but a vote but not anything they actually say. Would love to hear the logic behind that one too.
I'll explain either if anyone else is interested, but I'm not doing shit for you.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:54 am
by AngryPidgeon
Reminder: please try to to be civil as much as possible. Also make sure not to mention other ongoing games
Thanks!
Lurker is due a prod in about 20 hours.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:56 am
by Syryana
↑buldermar wrote:I'll explain either if anyone else is interested, but I'm not doing shit for you.
May I ask what purpose you were trying to convey with that quote-wall?
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:57 am
by Syryana
↑AngryPidgeon wrote:Reminder: please try to to be civil as much as possible. Also make sure not to mention other ongoing games
In all his bile I don't think he's taken a single shot at me.
VOTE: SafetyDance
I was wondering about this and about why scum-SD wouldn't jump on your wagon. What is your explanation(?), because I'm pretty sure it's not the same as mine.
I'm pretty sure I know what your explanation is.
I can think of a few reasons. If the players that were currently under lynch threat are all town then letting town take a policy lynch on some other townie today means that I'm tomorrow's likely mislynch. Also, once I flip I'm predicting a whole lot of finger pointing and recriminations. That's why a couple players distancing from what looks like a town consensus that I'm probably scum is starting to bother me.
I'm also pretty sure you know what my explanation is. However, I don't have a scum-ff explanation for why you'd voluntarily bring up that he has not taken a single shot at you, which bothers me.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:10 am
by fferyllt
By the time SD entered the thread hadn't my bandwagon already softened? The thread was choppy with other bandwagons.
Thread momentum here is not as big a factor as I'm used to, but it's still a factor.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:26 am
by pitoli
SafetyDance is leaning scum... I initially thought he was town because scum wouldn't want to jump into a game so aggressively - it'd be much easier to fly under the radar as Sotty had been doing before replacement. I'm more annoyed at the noise he added to the thread, and am inclined to think this could be a smokescreen of sorts? I don't buy that he's getting null reads on me and Syryana simply for lack of posts (Deltabacon I understand).
We're not lynching Orc today. Do you even have a case, SD?
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:58 am
by pitoli
↑Syryana wrote:So how would you characterize your town play versus your scum play?
I don't think I have a handle on what my forum play looks like yet, or what I want it to look like. But like most people, I try to play them similarly. As either faction I'm quiet and I'll let others talk over me, that's just indicative of my personality really - not making waves. As town I can be insecure in my reads, I rely a lot on intuition (this is simpler in real life), and I find building wagons difficult. I'm slow to vote and sometimes, this makes me scummy; other times, this makes people think I'm softclaiming an investigative role or something. As scum I feel more license to throw my vote around/be more aggressive, and I'll make the conscious effort to look paranoid. As both I get accused of being handwavy a lot, which as a self-critique I'd have to say is accurate.
But does this line of questioning actually lead anywhere? Do you really think as scum I wouldn't WIFOM the shit out of this or just blatantly make things up?
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:03 am
by SafetyDance
↑orcinus_theoriginal wrote:That's a giant backtrack and its so obvious I'm going to let somebody else explain it because I'm off to bed
Really quickly though
In post 511, SafetyDance wrote:
Scum in: buldermar, fferyllt, orcinus_theoriginal
I think there's definite scum here because I don't think your reactions to each other are all coming from town.
--
Why would you put ff under "scum in" if you don't think she was scum? It's like me giving a list that looked like
Scum in: [playerlist]
Your anger looks manufactured and its really not helping your case.
Buld: put him to l-1 or give me your reasons why you aren't
And nice OMGUS try to make it slightly less transparent next time, SD. I enjoy how you didn't address much of my post.
I THINK SHE'S THE MOST TOWN OUT OF YOU THREE. THEREFORE THE TOWN READ. WHAT CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
I don't like her self-meta defence, I think she's borderline trolling here with the "he's ignoring me" bs but I believe her claim and her favor and I don't think she's being particularly scummy out of the three of you and in general. So she's a town read but I think there's scum in that group. She's part of that group.
It's not an OMGUS, its you not even trying to understand what I'm saying and just insulting me for it because you have the others to back you up. You're deliberately misrepping what I say, you're being antagonistic as well and trying to obfuscate as much as what.
I've be addressing your posts constantly, and unlike you I hadn't even made a false claim of not reading them, so explain WHAT else I didn't address.
I'm putting that in quotations because literally it is too terrible to be the work of even the worst town player.
That kinda fits with the 'not here' vibe in a way. I'm almost certainly going to be lynched, though maybe not today. He's distanced himself from that. Nobody else has done so quite that emphatically, except maybe pitoli.
You also didn't read this, SD.
You being insulting? This is irrelevant, it ff still thinking I'm ignoring her. It's a complete fabrication like your claims.
↑buldermar wrote:
I'll explain either if anyone else is interested, but I'm not doing shit for you.
Lol, and I'm meant to be the insulting one?
↑pitoli wrote:SafetyDance is leaning scum... I initially thought he was town because scum wouldn't want to jump into a game so aggressively - it'd be much easier to fly under the radar as Sotty had been doing before replacement. I'm more annoyed at the noise he added to the thread, and am inclined to think this could be a smokescreen of sorts? I don't buy that he's getting null reads on me and Syryana simply for lack of posts (Deltabacon I understand).
We're not lynching Orc today. Do you even have a case, SD?
This is all based on a a post from yesterday. Do you think some of my reads may have changed since then? Are you going to go against everyone else for null reads? I can spend the half an hour it will take going back through the thread and find you others with them, are you going to accuse them too?
I'm not being a supplicant to their little whims and I personally don't enjoy having to read through the complete mass of worthless posting.
The fact that bulder for example, quotes and doesn't even both trimming them to what is relevant to what he is responding to shows he doesn't really care about anything other than his post count and making them look busy.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:16 am
by pitoli
Christ. Will you stop complaining about the amount of posts in thread or replace out.
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:21 am
by Syryana
↑pitoli wrote:Christ. Will you stop complaining about the amount of posts in thread or replace out.
↑buldermar wrote:pitoli, what do you think of Nero?
What do I think of Nero? I'm confused whether he's actually motivated by his wincondition or not. The occasional non-trollish post by him isn't actually meant to be helpful; it looks more self-preservatory from this angle. I do think it's something scum Nero would do to push the policy lynch onto Lurker.
