Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:37 pm
And now you're doing the same with me. I don't get it.
I've never heard scum say this before.In post 672, TheIrishPope wrote:Scum wouldn't be this obvious
Read 602 through 617In post 673, notscience wrote:Why do you think he's scum?
Show me where I said it.In post 675, TheIrishPope wrote:And now you're doing the same with me. I don't get it.
Kerberos wrote:Hey, Borkie when did you start town-reading us? I don't remember you mentioning us as town at all
bork wrote:I think Kerb is pretty town for her high level of paranoia, picking up on my point about Don, reading NS as town, and I just like Maragal's #492 overall.
Why?TIP wrote:Slight scumread [on bork]
What the hell is this? "Using the circumstances to look like town?" Explain what that means and how it's scummy because that just looks like you want to read me as scum but you have no reason to. I looked like town all the times I've beaten you as scum so I must be scum again? Are you fucking serious?AA wrote:
Bork you’re once again using the circumstances to look like town. This is what you have been doing with me from past two games where you were scum. And why exactly Jacob is minor town while he didn’t’ say anything either? And I also see you being soft with Hydra.. something is cooking..
wtf, are you reading another game? My scumreads are bork and TIP.In post 680, ArcAngel9 wrote:Notscience and wisdom both manage to list me, Jacob and DJ as scum.
Its the way you reading Kerb town, what do you even mean she is high level of paranoia?. TBH, I see kerb as null. there is nothing they said looked townie, the only decept post they made so far is psot #492 and you quickly read her town after that while ever mentioned anything positive about them, and yes, I am bit worried about our history. you tend to read people town out of small context which you did with me in the Friends and Enemies. So, I am being cautions, Again when did I say i read you scum? I said that you reading hydra as town out of one reasonable post sounds very oppurtunist and seems like something is cooking. And i don't have good opinion abou that.In post 683, borkjerfkin wrote:What the hell is this? "Using the circumstances to look like town?" Explain what that means and how it's scummy because that just looks like you want to read me as scum but you have no reason to. I looked like town all the times I've beaten you as scum so I must be scum again? Are you fucking serious?
I said exactly the post I read as town from Jacob. How am I being "soft" with kerberos? The fact that I'm townreading them? How should I be acting toward them instead?
In post 615, Wisdom wrote:ns:bork, I think AA, Jacob and dj are scum. You agree?bork: Jacob yeah, but feg > Jacob. Also Wisdom, but Jacob> Wisdom. And I agree with AA and dj too.
The question is about scumreads. You agreed with all three scumreads and gave two more; feg, who you suspect more than those three, and Wisdom, who's supposed to be a townread and therefore should not be mentioned there.
It's really out of nowhere.
And this one... Where NotScience happens to read you town... WOW, How Coincidental that you both not just have similar reads but She also reads you town..and what next ? Let me guess you someone read her town too... And they you both will take a part in LYNCH THE LURKERS, Isn't it???In post 593, notscience wrote:Bork, what do you think about the AA9, Jacob and DJ as 3/4 of the scumteam?Of course, it'd be better after a good flip. but as an estimate I like the prospects.
AA9 for reasons you've already brought up
Jacob is just sitting around, although you said he had a minor towntell I don't quite like him just sitting around doing nothing. I disagree with you saying he shouldn't be shot, but meh.
DJ for his hypocrisy and "shoot the hydra" mentality
In post 601, notscience wrote:Honestly, my biggest issue with TIP atm is that he won't answer my damn question. I don't like his excuse either. He also thinks he should be considered conf-town, which sits funny with me.
Kerb is a gut feeling that I think they are town.
Bork's posts have good points and seem overall pro-town.
I'm reading Wisdom as leaning town, as we had a lot of the same mentalities (look at the past few pages if you want proof of that) and that usually sits well for me.
OT I have leaning town, it's a gut feeling really.
Feg is null, I'd be willing to put him in with the scum lot however. Definately has potential to be one.
If there's other people they need to post more because I can't remember everyone.
AA wrote:Again when did I say i read you scum?
Says pretty definitively you're leaning scum slightly on me.AA wrote:I am leaning scum on Wisdom, slightly on bork and probably POPE
I was referencing ns's question to bork. Hence the "ns:" in front of it. I didn't say thatIn post 686, ArcAngel9 wrote:Alright Wisdom, Let's do this in your way...
SEE THE BOLDED!!!!
In post 615, Wisdom wrote:ns:bork, I think AA, Jacob and dj are scum. You agree?bork: Jacob yeah, but feg > Jacob. Also Wisdom, but Jacob> Wisdom. And I agree with AA and dj too.
Says pretty definitively you're leaning scum slightly on me.AA wrote:I am leaning scum on Wisdom, slightly on bork and probably POPE
In post 594, borkjerfkin wrote:Jacob's possible scum for sure,but Feg is more likely to me. Wisdom is possible but I'd shoot Jacob over Wisdom right now.
I agree on the other two.
And not to forget you stated that "He is a micro town too". the problem is that you reading him as town/scum at the same time. you can't read him both the ways..so pick your side and give a support reading.
Answer this: Who do you read town currently?In post 690, Wisdom wrote:ns means noscience in case you're wondering
So, derp? Or do you have any other reason why I am scum?
You're wrong. Its my business becuz I checked again. Its like you never statted who you read town in this game. that's weird.
*shrug* you asked why I thought I said you read me as scum, so I don't know what else to say to this.AA wrote:And again, I said I read you slightly scum, not entirely scum
It was a good post with a lot of content. Again, you're attacking the amount of evidence I'm giving, not the quality of it. That is disingenuous.AA wrote:And about your read on Kerbious, its not the number of reasons that you're basing to read them as town. its how you suddenly started reading them as town out of one post.
Your unwillingness to give town reads!! that's anti-town. therefore, makes you most possible scum.In post 695, Wisdom wrote:And that makes me scum because?
You read me as town in Friends and Enemies since your replacment into that game, you manage to read me town without giving any support content. you are almost acting similar with Kerb in this game. that's worrying me a lot...In post 696, borkjerfkin wrote:I have no idea why you're bringing friends and enemies into this...I was scum and you were bleeding obvtown in that game so I had no choice but to read you as town. Neither of those apply to this game.