I'll start with Ghostlin. The way he went about the hammer looks town (probably enough to ignore him today) but I still have reservations. While Fuzzy's logic is all wrong (you can't explain why town might do something and then insist that scum wouldn't try to do that, because the whole point of scum is that they want to look like town) I think it's fairly obvious that he believes what he's saying, so I find posts like this hard to understand.
...my answer has to be 'no, not something specific in that last post'
but
, assuming for now that the masons are telling the truth, I find it difficult to imagine a scumgroup not containing TMOAFGKAMLDXP at this point. I'm happy enough to call Fuzzy, DV and Saint town for the time being and that does narrow things down a fair bit.
Amrun, you haven't actually spoken about TSAPTERASA today despite the early vote - could you summarise why you're voting him please? BRO, could you explain the quoted post?
Sure!
Basically, crazyletters has been playing very timidly, even accounting for being a newbie. He's being timid in a particular way I find indicative of noobscum: scared to commit, backing down immediately when challenged, etc. And when he DOES finally take a stance, I generally find it inaccurate and weak and I can't relate to it as coming from a town perspective.
One of the worst single incidents was when he was asked to explain a "strong townread," and his answer was, "It's not strong anymore." This doesn't read genuinely to me AT ALL.
Add to that refusing to put Angel at L-1 yesterday DESPITE her being a professed scumread and letters reads very much like "cautious scum" to me.
And as for your thoughts on fuzzy, I'm conflicted. As you said, he's obviously wrong, but DOES he believe it? I flip flop on it. One one hand, he SEEMS convicted enough, but on the other, his explanation makes so little sense that I can see it coming from scum who's being doggedly consistent even after putting forth a stance that doesn't quite make sense. Scum are often worried to back down on their word and appear inconsistent. Either way, I'm not eager and jumping to lynch fuzzy today, but as I said, my straight town read on him is retracted.
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 2:16 pm
by fuzzybutternut
^Lol
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:26 pm
by Lord Mhork
Oh! Those are good points! I'm gonna sheep amrun for now.
VOTE: TMTOLBTWNTOF
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:49 pm
by BROseidon
In post 676, fuzzybutternut wrote:The only thing I can say is that Rach and Mhork are pretty much conf. town now.
But no letters vote?
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:53 pm
by Nexus
Votecount 2.2:
TMTOLBTWNTOF (5)-
Amrun, Ghostlin, BROseidon, Channeldelibird, Lord Mhork
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch. The deadline is at 6am BST on Thursday 27th June 2013.
TMTOLBTWNTOF is being prodded
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:58 pm
by Saint
====[]
here's why
i don't like seeing him say "mhork is town" for 2 reasons
amrun and CDB both have good reasoning
not arguing with you all on this one
vote: tmtolbtwntof
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:03 pm
by Nexus
Votecount 2.3:
TMTOLBTWNTOF (6 - LYNCH)-
Amrun, Ghostlin, BROseidon, Channeldelibird, Lord Mhork, Saint
Amrun (1)-
fuzzybutternut
Not Voting (5)-
DeasVail, RachMarie, penguin_alien, TMTOLBTWNTOF
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch. The deadline is at 6am BST on Thursday 27th June 2013.
TMTOLBTWNTOF has been lynched. Flip (no scene because I'm going to be late for work) incoming
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:06 pm
by Nexus
Night 2. Deadline is 7am BST on Thursday 20th June 2013.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:42 pm
by Nexus
Day 3. With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Deadline is at 6am BST on Thursday July 4th
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:44 pm
by fuzzybutternut
Saint, that was absolutely terrible, and you should feel terrible.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:23 pm
by Ghostlin
In post 686, fuzzybutternut wrote:Saint, that was absolutely terrible, and you should feel terrible.
^This.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:24 pm
by Amrun
VOTE: penguin_alien
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:04 pm
by Lord Mhork
K then. I'm gonna check this over. How many scums are there likely to be in a setup like this?
inb4 "herpaderp fake towntelling"
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:15 pm
by Amrun
Why would you be concerned about towntelling or not towntelling as a mason?
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:30 pm
by RachMarie
mhork chill you are my twin relax we got this.
@ Saint whats up with the whole hammer no intent and then using as your reason the mhork is town bit? You STILL think he and I are scumz? what the hay?
GOOD NEWS I get my new computer TOMORROW
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:36 pm
by Lord Mhork
Force of habit there. I just wanna know how many scums we should consider and whether or not we are nearing LyLo. I dunno. It's really late and I'm fried.... >.<
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:23 pm
by RachMarie
in a 13 player game it is usually 3 or 2 scumz plus a SK .
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:01 pm
by ChannelDelibird
Amrun, you haven't mentioned penguin_alien for a long time. I don't necessarily disagree with the vote but why not expand on it?
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:38 pm
by ChannelDelibird
I'm not normally one to do this but I had the urge (and the time) just now and I think it could help. I went back and had a look through the vote counts to see if there was anything to be learned.
I put confirmed dead town in green and myself in blue and that didn't illuminate an awful lot but, when I put the masons in purple (as I don't think they're lying), it looks more interesting.
If scum were on the ArcAngel lynch, they came to it late. I will have a look back at that lynch as a matter of priority - Ghostlin's hammer, which I thought was town at the time but stands against a few scumdar pings, needs reevaluation.
I'll go and do that now but I think I know where I'm going to be voting at the end of it.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:53 pm
by ChannelDelibird
Ghostlin's 531 (pre-supersaint claim) has a weird language dissonance. He says "Let me give it to you slowly: We. Are. Not. Lynching. Claimed. Masons. Today." which sounds like the sort of thing you'd say as a last chance, get-your-shit-together-or-I-vote-you thing, but then he just votes her anyway. Seems like a best-of-both-worlds scum post.
Yeah, I feel there's enough there that Ghostlinscum would have believed that Arc was faking for some reason and be confident enough to hammer. I mean, we all knew Arc was faking, it was obvious bullshit, that's why she was lynched.
Also worth noting: Jake wanted Ghostlin dead pretty badly and he died N1.
Meanwhile, BRO's 523 looks like scum keeping hands clean in expectation of Arctown while encouraging pressure.
VOTE: Ghostlin
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 6:27 am
by fuzzybutternut
Yeah, I agree with CDB.
VOTE: Ghostlin
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:50 am
by Ghostlin
In post 696, ChannelDelibird wrote:Ghostlin's 531 (pre-supersaint claim) has a weird language dissonance. He says "Let me give it to you slowly: We. Are. Not. Lynching. Claimed. Masons. Today." which sounds like the sort of thing you'd say as a last chance, get-your-shit-together-or-I-vote-you thing, but then he just votes her anyway. Seems like a best-of-both-worlds scum post. (1)
Yeah, I feel there's enough there that Ghostlinscum would have believed that Arc was faking for some reason and be confident enough to hammer. I mean, we all knew Arc was faking, it was obvious bullshit, that's why she was lynched. (2)
Also worth noting: Jake wanted Ghostlin dead pretty badly and he died N1.
Meanwhile, BRO's 523 looks like scum keeping hands clean in expectation of Arctown while encouraging pressure.
VOTE: Ghostlin
1) No. She was being stupid and insisting Mhork was going to hammer a super saint claim. We don't put masons in danger because you've got a boner of a fake claim and you want them to hammer you as supersaint. It doesn't happen. It was scummy.
2) Reading this sentence it essentially reads, "Ghostlin was secure that Archangel was scum and willing to hammer because Archangel's claim was bad." This ignores two facts: Town or scum, I wouldn't have necessarily known AA was bluffing. I would have a lot more to lose as scum being correct than Town. Fact two: this reason is a bunch of cognitive dissonance masquerading as a valid reason to vote. I could of been equally secure of AA's claim being fake as Town but wanted to test it. I could of been holding out on my own flip. Fact is, bad claim, volunteering to hammer for town because Town insists=/=scum.
3) This is WIFOM and you know it.
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:54 am
by fuzzybutternut
Ghostlin, tell me why your scum team is trying to frame the two masons, please.