Page 28 of 246
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:32 pm
by Rift Adrift
In post 672, Serene wrote:Calcifer actually went along with the bone-headed idea of supplying 4 players for some insane lynch pool.
Then voted a townie.
I want to hang this scummy thing in the temple of all that is sacred.
Interesting.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:10 pm
by StevieT92
In post 650, Zdenek wrote:Town:
Ankamius
Baby Spice
Brian Hollywood
BROseidon
dramonic
Rift Adrift
Nero
Calcifer
TheIrishPope
KingCrabd
ProHawk
Metal Sonic
orcinus_theoriginal
DOMO
StubbsKVM
Maybe scum:
Serene (hydra) truly14
The Goat
BulbaFenix
T S O
Scum:
Doc Holliday
StevieT92
TMTOLBTWNTOF
Shadi1337
dude you are trying SO HARD to look town right now
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:11 pm
by Serene
Dramonic started by emphatically voting scum, which we found pleasing. He then switched to a townie, which was correspondingly less impressive.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:13 pm
by Serene
@ Zdenek
The scum acknowledges that your reads are too accurate for comfort:
You should be proud.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:14 pm
by StevieT92
In post 678, Serene wrote:@ Zdenek
The scum acknowledges that your reads are too accurate for comfort:
You should be proud.
lawl so hard motherf***as wanna fine me
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:27 pm
by StubbsKVM
In post 657, Baby Spice wrote: In post 574, StubbsKVM wrote: In post 571, Baby Spice wrote: In post 468, StubbsKVM wrote: In post 464, Baby Spice wrote:To mr. Crab.
Re: Stubbs.
Private scum tell. Stubs did something specific that I have only seen done twice, both times by scum. Call this time yhe testing of a theory
His iso also struck me as scummy.
So what you're saying is: "I have a scumtell but don't want to share?" Why bother telling then?
it's easy to say someone is scummy. Making a (decent) case about it is a different matter.
Oh there's more. But I was asked why I had you on my list.
An actual case could wait until I, to pull an example out of thin air, actually vote you. Well that and computer access.
I can't wait.
You seem overly worried. Is there a reason for that?
Just want you to have something to say. Content on me is better than no content
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:32 pm
by StubbsKVM
In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
Why do
you
think I am scumreading you, Stubbs?
Nero is definitely town. I meta'd him to death for BSG. He's town. Don't touch him.
I'm not you, therefore I don't know. Why not just answer?
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:44 pm
by StubbsKVM
Forgot to mention: Nero posted a townread!
That counts as at least some content
UNVOTE:
VOTE: dramonic
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:26 pm
by Rift Adrift
In post 670, Rift Adrift wrote:
My opinion of policy lynches hasn't changed much.
I have zero experiential meta on dramonic. What about you?
I haven't done a meta dive yet. Will find some time for one tonight.
League of Legends game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26305 (sorry can't get an iso link to work). dramonic was town. The difference in content and seriousness between this game and that one is pretty dramatic. Nacho played that game, so I'd like to hear his thoughts.
Gay Mafia II game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4531749. dramonic was town in this game, too. A little more goofiness than the League of Legends game, but it looks like more content than this game.
Experimental Role Mafia:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=21773. paydirt, I think. dramonic was scum.
gonna have a talk with Syryana.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:29 pm
by Rift Adrift
Cabd, did you do meta research on dramonic for this game?
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:42 pm
by Ankamius
As someone who was in LoL mafia, I'm not really convinced about Dram-meta in that case. Most of his content in that game was more on the setup than actual reads and other things. Honestly, he might have done exactly the same thing he's doing here if LoL mafia didn't start off with something he had strong feelings against.
Yay tablet posting.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:38 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
Can you stop being so freaking obvscum
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:46 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 681, StubbsKVM wrote: In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
Why do
you
think I am scumreading you, Stubbs?
Nero is definitely town. I meta'd him to death for BSG. He's town. Don't touch him.
I'm not you, therefore I don't know. Why not just answer?
Can't you guess
It gives you towncred
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:47 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 676, StevieT92 wrote: In post 650, Zdenek wrote:Town:
Ankamius
Baby Spice
Brian Hollywood
BROseidon
dramonic
Rift Adrift
Nero
Calcifer
TheIrishPope
KingCrabd
ProHawk
Metal Sonic
orcinus_theoriginal
DOMO
StubbsKVM
Maybe scum:
Serene (hydra) truly14
The Goat
BulbaFenix
T S O
Scum:
Doc Holliday
StevieT92
TMTOLBTWNTOF
Shadi1337
dude you are trying SO HARD to look town right now
This man here is town
Do not touch him
Or you will have to answer to me.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:49 pm
by Calcifer
There is also plenty of other things to do.
In post 505, fferyllt wrote:Calcifer? Is it just me, or for a rev post does this ping a little?
Rev's postings have been pinging for me in little ways all game. Mastin disagrees, so I'm sitting back and watching him for now.
But yeah, that stinks.
In post 513, Brian Hollywood wrote:Ah, makes sense. Well, I didn't do it for reaction tests. I did it just to generate more discussion.
What do you think of the discussion that has been going on without your reaction test?
I'm seriously doubting Zdenek scum.
In post 600, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Thanks.
But since we're on the subject I'm a bit surprised I'm still being townread so easily despite said game.
Should I be a bit worried
No.
In post 608, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Oh yeah, most of the times it's obvious, but for the times that it isn't I need Mastin and Nacho to sign their posts please thanks
I can't tell the two of you apart :/
Sucks for you.
In post 672, Serene wrote:I want to hang this scummy thing in the temple of all that is sacred.
Have you read any of our posts since that one?
He's been playing to his scum meta so far. It usually takes longer to sort him out, though.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:54 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: calcifer
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:12 pm
by StubbsKVM
In post 687, orcinus_theoriginal wrote: In post 681, StubbsKVM wrote: In post 659, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:I dunno if TIP is scum or not
I want to policy lynch dramonic, not TIP. Talk to me about that fery.
Why do
you
think I am scumreading you, Stubbs?
Nero is definitely town. I meta'd him to death for BSG. He's town. Don't touch him.
I'm not you, therefore I don't know. Why not just answer?
Can't you guess
It gives you towncred
I'd rather look into other people than try to look into my own posts to see how you could find me scum. That's a waste of time.
If you've got a point to make, make it. If you don't, then I'm dropping this.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:19 pm
by Shadi1337
In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscum
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:29 pm
by StubbsKVM
In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote: In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscum
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them
, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
We have to ask before you'll share your reads??
So you have no intention to contribute anything before we ask?
okay I'll ask:
How can we consider you to be town if you don't share any of your thoughts/reads?
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:38 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: Shadi
We're done for today. Lynch his face lol
Reaction testing is a bullshit excuse. I've always held that if you can't tell me what you've learned through your reaction test, it's not a reaction test, it's just a scummy thing that you did that you're trying to wiggle out of.
Stubbs hi want to bus your buddy for me
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:41 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
And of course you note that I scumread you within like 30 minutes of starting to read up in the game
so
Unsuccessfully, yes.
You've let your scumbuds down
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:47 pm
by T S O
"I want to work my own reads out of others." What the hell does this even mean?
Vote: Shadi1337
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:55 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
If you were really reaction testing, this was your chance to own up to you. You would've noticed that I was scumreading you. In response, however, you said
I don't know
Yeah bullshit. If you were reaction testing then you would've known what it was that you were doing that I found scummy.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:12 pm
by StubbsKVM
In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote: In post 176, ProHawk wrote:For the record, I hate all of you that have nothing to say but criticism. It's honestly not all that dumb, but I do suppose change is hard for the simple minded. Regardless it has served its purpose regardless of whether or not you agreed with the idea or not.
VOTE: Shadi
From him I get the shielded scum-vibe.
Sorry dude, but what are you searching for? A medal? I mean kudos for (perhaps) trying to scum hunt and set some pressure on a few players but other than kicking off the game a bit your reasoning was weak; just rvs for that.
The simple minded would let it go and think it meant nothing, smart people question the purpose of a lot and criticise stuff rather than going along blind-folded.
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
In post 177, Mac wrote:
Krab person (cabd?) - why did you feel the need to seperate orc for not having enough posts from everyone else who don't have enough posts? I found this kinda bizarre behaviour.
I think (not sure) what was meant is that Orc posted unlike many others, but not a lot. Just a shoot in the dark though. It does indeed seem a bit off, but so far I'm having a town read on Krab more or less; unlike the one I had in newbie newbie by Maestro with him. Then again he's a split personality this time.
In post 306, Shadi1337 wrote: In post 305, Baby Spice wrote:The last.
You answered a question directed at someone else. It could even be said that you defended someone whom you could not possible have a town read on from a question directed at someone else.
I can even see you leaving the vote in there as an attempt to direct the attention of others away from you question to me.
"Look I'm just asking a question, she's voting someone else"
As for the part, fair point. I'm not going to argue against it. I just thought I could share my thoughts about it while /maybe/ answering his question. inb4 this post is also very scummy
As for the second part, welp wasn't the intention but whatever; I genuinely just... left it.
In post 692, Shadi1337 wrote: In post 686, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Can you stop being so freaking obvscum
Like you are pressuring people about their reads in this shitty general manner that does nothing but try (unsuccessfully) to look like you are doing something, while having basically /no reads of your own/.
Finally someone jumped onto the fact that I wasn't giving reads myself, shame it had to be one I personally read scum.
Unsuccessfully? It worked fine up until now; and I want to work my own reads out of other people's reads instead of spamming reads more than Google is used.
If you want reads so badly then ask for them, give names preferably I cannot be bothered with a full reads list.
so you're not giving reads, while giving reads in the quoted posts. Your posts are contradicting.
Also, your ISO strikes me as very defensive.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shadi
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:24 pm
by Baby Spice
Yeah, early read firming up.
Vote Shadi