Mafiascum.net

You agreed to this situation, Why are you complaining now? Because you're suddenly not so obvtown anymore?

Feel free to throw your vote down on me. It's win win for me if you makes this 1v1, either I don't check back anymore cos I'm dead or we potentially win.

And yes, I agreed under the stupid assumption nacho might give this game some of his time after requesting it. Didn't happen though did it?

I don't see the need to. I have more than enough trust in Nacho's scumhunting abilities.
If he fails to find it, then he's definitely it. It's that simple.

In post 677, StubbsKVM wrote:I have more than enough trust in Nacho's scumhunting abilities.

I have not read a scummier statement all week.

VOTE: Stubbs - let's go, Nacho.

[/b].

Sorry guys, went away for the weekend. But it appears Nacho is getting scummier by the minute anyway. I don't know why he is prolonging this if he is scum though. He's a dead man walking. Stubbs was my preferred lynch today so I'm happy with how its looking so far. Still want to hear from Nacho though.

Nacho is deadscum walking if he's not Town, so we might as well look elsewhere for today. But yeah, super frustrated with his lack of attention to the thread.

I'm going to re-read stubbs...

Nacho isn't helping his case by being inactive. However I still think we save him for tomorrow.

In post 664, Mr. Flay wrote:Generic still doesn't strike me as a good scum candidate. He could have stayed off the Antagonwagon D1, among many other things mentioned already.

I'm pretty tired of associative tells at present, actually. What are the other things mentioned already that you like the most?

In post 671, Karnage wrote:1 - as BP, were any of your early posts designed to draw a NK? if so, which ones?

No. I draw NKs easily enough already.

In post 671, Karnage wrote:2 - I think your current read on generic is that he could be scum, is that accurate?

Yes.

In post 671, Karnage wrote:3 - Under what conditions is it appropriate for a massclaim?

What do you mean?

In post 674, Generic wrote:You have my vote down now, I will check in periodically but not much more to say from me...

Why do you think it's Stubbs?

In post 676, Generic wrote:I agreed under the stupid assumption nacho might give this game some of his time after requesting it.

I haven't put time into this game? I do occasionally disappear but I don't think it's fair to say that I haven't put time in this game.

In post 678, Mr. Flay wrote:I have not read a scummier statement all week.

It's exactly the mindset I expected from him. Why is it scummy to you?

For a guy who asked for two lynches he would analyse and lead instead of us just lynching you, your return to this is to question me on my Stubbs vote, flay on his town read on me and then complain Bout my comment about you putting in no effort on this game?

Wow, I'm so glad I was wrong about you nacho, that was an analysis worth waiting all weekend for...

Since I've started pushing you, you've shut down completely and have started taking potshots at me. Why?

In post 319, StubbsKVM wrote:it's also possible a jailkeeper targeted the scum player
or the scum player could have targeted a bulletproof.

All speculation.

Btw, I found this very telling in my look back over Stubbs.

I believe this was pre champs revelation... If scum he would know that the kill was unsuccessful, making nacho the target and the mafia player not knowing if they had been protected or blocked

In post 685, Nachomamma8 wrote:Since I've started pushing you, you've shut down completely and have started taking potshots at me. Why?

I shut down out of boredom long before that. But have you analysed anything yet?

Being the case against me, if champ flay and karnage like it you have everyone on side, cos Stubbs is already sold.

And another question without addressing my content? Seriously nacho are you starting to give up at this stage?

Being the case = bring the case

In post 686, Generic wrote:

In post 319, StubbsKVM wrote:it's also possible a jailkeeper targeted the scum player
or the scum player could have targeted a bulletproof.

All speculation.

Btw, I found this very telling in my look back over Stubbs.

I believe this was pre champs revelation... If scum he would know that the kill was unsuccessful, making nacho the target and the mafia player not knowing if they had been protected or blocked

This is Day 2, after the first night without a kill, replying to your post

In post 318, Generic wrote:It's feel it or fegelein/chkflip.

But don't disregard any of the ones to be replaced or recently replaced, technically I should be dead by now. I was considered town universally and hammered the mafia player.

So unless we have a doc (silence if you are out there, I do NOT want to know, just keep up the good work) the kill wasn't registered in time.

I think your reaction is pretty worse, looking back at it.

Im still waiting on the analysis of why nacho has chosen me for the lynch for today.

but like I said, you are already sold, and the only reason I wont be following through with a vote on me is I don't believe in self votes, otherwise I would endorse the nacho vote one last time.

I know im flipping town if its me for the lynch, so nacho is a dead man the next day and if he has been telling the truth you are out of options stubbs. But do feel free double teaming me with no actual case, its fun to see these comments with nothing to back them up.

endorse the nacho vote one last time = endorse giving him the second lynch he requested before he is himself lynched.


Its part of why I think you are scum stubbs. You had me as your top town read, but now im your top scum read. please explain.

Your play after day 1 hasn't been as good to say the least.

Miss Stranger was my top town read.
Nacho is my first scum option, although it's only because of the night actions, and not because of his play.

You're my other option, because I think Flay would have killed champino if he was scum.

You know you're town is not a valid argument by the way.

I know I'm town, but I'm pretty sure you won't believe me neither.

I'm trying to find more options for people being scum. If we're all here just waiting for Nacho to do all the work, why bother playing?

I have a lot of confidence in Nacho's scumhunting, and he has a flawless record on reading me. If Nacho is somehow town, I'm pretty confident he will find the scum.

If he's scum, we'll lynch him at lylo and have this in the bag anyway.

You keep complaining about me actually trying to find something, and the only thing you've got on me is my response to your post on day 2.

On another note, nobody has voted you, why do you think you're so definitely going to get lynched today?

Im only interested in lynching you or nacho, so I have made my vote respecting the wishes of the only confirmed town player.

And still waiting for the case that makes me scummiest by posts. OMGUS doesn't count.

I think if scumnacho thought he would be given the lynch without question he would remove me, because you are scummier looking and he can try and talk his way out of the lynch the next day. Yet you have dropped the scummiest post of the day phase by sucking up to nacho before now saying he is top scum read by night actions only? so this avoiding direct analysis, deflecting criticism of his play by firing questions back at the player and generally not showing any real drive to live (if I was in his position I would have placed an analysis for 2-3 reads the previous day, he sort of just went with the flow of where the mood was going with the choice of feel it...).

And again you buddy up to him...

Nacho wrote:I'm pretty tired of associative tells at present, actually.

In general/meta, or in this game specifically?

In post 683, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 664, Mr. Flay wrote:Generic still doesn't strike me as a good scum candidate. He could have stayed off the Antagonwagon D1, among many other things mentioned already.

What are the other things mentioned already that you like the most?

I'll have to reread to tell you specifically, and this week is very busy. Basically it was all of the Good Guy Generic posts after D1, rolled up in a ball.

Nacho wrote:

In post 678, Mr. Flay wrote:

In post 677, StubbsKVM wrote:I have more than enough trust in Nacho's scumhunting abilities.

I have not read a scummier statement all week.

It's exactly the mindset I expected from him. Why is it scummy to you?

It's pure buddying. "I believe in you Nacho! You can do it Nacho! As long as you're not going to lynch me..." And he does it again in 692.

I don't think you're comprehending how DEMORALIZING it is to wait days and days for you, Nacho. Everyone's basically beholden to your decision-making, but you're not interacting, you're proclaiming from on high, every few days, and then disappearing again. There's no fucking reason this game has to take as long as it is right now...

I have no problem getting lynched if that's what everybody wants. I'm just asking to put in a little effort yourselves.
Yes, I trust Nacho's scumhunting ability. If he want to lynch me, fine.

You all wanted a massclaim, you got it.
You all agreed to Nacho's idea, deal with it.


If I'm the one getting lynched today because I'm looking at other people besides Nacho, fine. At least I won't blame myself for handing out the victory.

I am looking at the same number of candidates as you Stubbs. 2.

But I'm not telling nacho he's the greatest while telling the rest of us he's in your bottom 2.

I don't really see your point.

If Nacho leads us to another mislynch, it only makes me more confident he's scum.

I have not crossed Flay off my list yet. I am only trying to have a discussion about this.
And your stubborn "it's you or Nacho" isn't helping.