Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:04 pm**

Yea. No change. Lynch SC.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:07 pm**

In post 673, Wisdom wrote:
In post 672, enomis wrote:SC in scum. See his latest post. Lynch him.
whats scummy about that post?

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:09 pm**

In post 670, Wisdom wrote:
Considering that you might be wrong sometimes might help

Yes, go on and ignore me.
Same for StrangerCoug in the QT. Communications have been closed it seems.

Just like Majiffy, I'll tell you what needs to happen:

Lynch StrangerCoug.
Read pages 24-25 carefully and with as much of an open mind as possible.
Agree that Wisdom needs to be in the lynchpool, somehow.
Keep a close eye on how Elyse, Amrun and AngryPidgeon act during these proceedings.
Lynch them depending on how they perform.

Yes, that sounds like a very good plan.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:12 pm**

Ignore you? I don't see you addressing me, you're just ridiculously calling me scum.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:16 pm**

In post 670, Wisdom wrote:
Considering that you might be wrong sometimes might help

Oh yes, and the reason I quoted this specifically: I read you wiki-gamepage. You KNOW you are prone to tunneling. Don't you think it's time to follow your own advice?

Not that it is entirely relevant in this case, because you're scum. But I found it quite rich you'd be telling pirate_mollie what to do.

Just look at your scenario. Look at it. Consider that it might be wrong. Yet you don't.

I'd think you might be tunneling town, stuck in his own ideas, but I've seen you play before, I know common sense does strike you at some point. Yet here it does not, further strengthening my belief that you are scum.

Yes you are. You so are. Argh. I can see you wriggling behind your computer right now, knowing I'm on to you. Feeling a bit surprised that I am after our short exchange. But I am. Face it. All you have left now is trying to make me less "believable" somehow, make sure the link between you and StrangerCoug becomes as murky as possible. But I won't allow that to happen, and you know it. You better know it. If I'm lynched they will be my last words. My reminder to everyone that the two of you should be next.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:18 pm**

I seriously lol'd

And yes, I consider I might be wrong, but I also consider I might be right.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:23 pm**

You make too much of a habit of the last thing.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:27 pm**

Well obviously I will support what I think is right, not back off because I might be wrong.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:32 pm**

You cannot seriously think you're right in this case. There is simply no way. Majiffy calls it a moment of retardation but I refuse to believe it. You know very well what you are doing.

I don't blame you. I really don't. Getting my lynched is your only option in order to be able to continue this game in a peaceful state of nullread-townread.

But enough of this. You're not only tunneling on me, you're also tunneling on one argument: a supposed link between me and Majiffy. What about all the other things that have been going on? How do these fit into your scenario?

And acknowledge pages 2' and 25 damnit! They did not disappear in some kind of void. They are still there, for everyone to read. It's so damned Obvious...

(PS, not game-related: I noticed the word Obvious is always automatically capitalized. Is this a website-thing?)

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:36 pm**

Show me what you want me to acknowledge, I don't remember you addressing me.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:39 pm**

Btw you're silly if you think I'd try to protect my scumbuddy in a game where I can actually bus him. If you think I'm scum, you should be at least thinking that Coug must be town and that I'm going for the credit when he flips.
WIFOM, sure, but that's how it is.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:54 pm**

In post 676, Wisdom wrote:
In post 673, Wisdom wrote:
In post 672, enomis wrote:SC in scum. See his latest post. Lynch him.
whats scummy about that post?

Summary: Weak hop onto a popular wagon. From majiffy.

Posted: **Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:59 pm**

In post 685, Wisdom wrote:Btw you're silly if you think I'd try to protect my scumbuddy in a game where I can actually bus him.

That's what you were doing at first. You were on his wagon, were you not? What were those reasons again? Oh, yes, you'll tell me to read your posts again, thus avoiding the publicity of your inconsistencies and incoherent behaviour.
But after the bussing, SC appealed to me in the QT, and all hell broke loose (well, not really, but I can't really think of another way to summarize the events). You thought you saw an opportunity to paint me as scum, and you took it. But I'll be damned if I don't try for that awful plan to backfire in your face.

If you think I'm scum, you should be at least thinking that Coug must be town and that I'm going for the credit when he flips.
WIFOM, sure, but that's how it is.

Yes, WIFOM, no buts. WIFOM and WIFOM to the power of WIFOM multiplied by WIFOM.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:01 am**

In post 684, Wisdom wrote:Show me what you want me to acknowledge, I don't remember you addressing me.

Page 24-25 is mainly a conversation between the both of us. Who else would I have been addressing?

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:16 am**

In post 688, Grimgroove wrote:
In post 684, Wisdom wrote:Show me what you want me to acknowledge, I don't remember you addressing me.
Page 24-25 is mainly a conversation between the both of us. Who else would I have been addressing?

If its a conversation between us then how have I not acknowledged its existence?

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:17 am**

In post 687, Grimgroove wrote:That's what you were doing at first. You were on his wagon, were you not? What were those reasons again? Oh, yes, you'll tell me to read your posts again, thus avoiding the publicity of your inconsistencies and incoherent behaviour.
But after the bussing, SC appealed to me in the QT, and all hell broke loose (well, not really, but I can't really think of another way to summarize the events). You thought you saw an opportunity to paint me as scum, and you took it. But I'll be damned if I don't try for that awful plan to backfire in your face

Now who is the one making assumptions?
I would never go back on my bussing like that, Grim.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:34 am**

In post 689, Wisdom wrote:
In post 688, Grimgroove wrote:
In post 684, Wisdom wrote:Show me what you want me to acknowledge, I don't remember you addressing me.
Page 24-25 is mainly a conversation between the both of us. Who else would I have been addressing?
If its a conversation between us then how have I not acknowledged its existence?

I'm talking about afterwards. You're pretending all the points I made about you there are non-existant.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:34 am**

In post 690, Wisdom wrote: I would never go back on my bussing like that, Grim.

Oh, ok, you're cleared then! Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:38 am**

In post 691, Grimgroove wrote:
In post 689, Wisdom wrote:
In post 688, Grimgroove wrote:
In post 684, Wisdom wrote:Show me what you want me to acknowledge, I don't remember you addressing me.
Page 24-25 is mainly a conversation between the both of us. Who else would I have been addressing?
If its a conversation between us then how have I not acknowledged its existence?
I'm talking about afterwards. You're pretending all the points I made about you there are non-existant.

I should remain calm and aim to be more clear. I'm guessing this will have confused you.

When I say "I'm talking about afterwards" I mean you didn't respond to the points brought up here. The only conclusion from your side was that you wanted to hear StrangerCoug's version of things. Despite you not finding his explanation satisfactory ("weird but whatever") you have not acted upon that. Why did you find SC's explanation so important at the time, if later on you do nothing with it?

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:39 am**

Can you summarize your points against me? All I seem to recall is you thinking that I'm trying to protect Coug. Which is stupid because a) we don't have a Coug flip yet, and b) You assume that I would stop bussing in the middle of the lynch and try to save my buddy which I'd never do. I'd take you more seriously if you supported I'm WKing Coug to take credit and push other mislynches next, because that's something I would do, but you don't.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:43 am**

In post 693, Grimgroove wrote:Why did you find SC's explanation so important at the time, if later on you do nothing with it?

Because I didn't know if I believe you, that thing seemed too weird.
But since he confirmed it happened, there's nothing I can do with it except think that Coug is weird.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:51 am**

In post 695, Wisdom wrote:
In post 693, Grimgroove wrote:Why did you find SC's explanation so important at the time, if later on you do nothing with it?
Because I didn't know if I believe you,

Which was ludicrous to begin with.

that thing seemed too weird.
But since he confirmed it happened, there's nothing I can do with it except think that Coug is weird.

Yes, that says it all really. Just accepting the fact that someone you used to have as "scum" in your reads is plainly weird and doesn't make sense in his explanations.

How is my assumption that he was trying to pull off an AtE any weirder than his explanation? Let alone scummier?

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:52 am**

Because that doesn't make sense as AtE.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:53 am**

And however weird it is that he asked you to do that, it's not alignment indicative. It's plain weird.

Posted: **Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:54 am**

In post 694, Wisdom wrote:Can you summarize your points against me? All I seem to recall is you thinking that I'm trying to protect Coug. Which is stupid because a) we don't have a Coug flip yet,

Partially thanks to you.

and b) You assume that I would stop bussing in the middle of the lynch and try to save my buddy which I'd never do.

There's a first time for everything, in case you're not simply lying about your meta. But I guess that's also something you'd never do, right?

I'd take you more seriously.

Oh, you take me seriously. I know you do

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1468: Legends of the Hidden Temple- Game Over!