Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:15 pm
VOTE: Key
Nope. Not how that works. "I cannot not" means "I must."In post 674, Jon Doe wrote:So 3 n't's make a net can't, right? So who else do you like Am?
If it is signed, it's Titus. If it isn't signed, it is Waynegg, I'm pretty sure.In post 677, borkjerfkin wrote:upon skimming Jon Doe's 405 is a weird hard pounce on SK despite having no interaction with them prior, and 426 ("I'm sure SK is scum") is out of sync with 458 (vote for SK) but I have no idea which head is doing what there
In post 31, Toogeloo wrote:MattP Merle Dixon confirmed?
Where's my Glen at? If you claim Glen now, I'll love you forever and give you total town points.
In post 90, Toogeloo wrote:No one claiming Glenn yet? I'm sad. No Town points for anyone yet.
Looking at motivation here. I see no town motivation. I see exactly what he alluded to ~ gambit. It works to give him town cred while at the same time looking for (and finding?) a PR for NK. Claim yourself is fine, stupid IMO, but fine. Coaxing someone who could easily not be vanilla to do the same...nah. Why isn't this a hot topic?In post 112, Toogeloo wrote:Erm... no?In post 106, Majiffy wrote:Because I don't see scum that knows what they're doing trying something like that. If it were a scum move, it'd be a scum move by newbie scum that saw a more experienced scum pull off something similar before. MattP does not fall under this category.
Newbie scum play safe games, try to stay out of the lime light, etc.
Pro scum try gambits that will excuse the reason they are still alive later in the game when they are normally night killed early on.
Making I joke of the can't at the end and thing them together. It's ok to laugh.In post 678, Amrun wrote:Nope. Not how that works. "I cannot not" means "I must."In post 674, Jon Doe wrote:So 3 n't's make a net can't, right? So who else do you like Am?
Yeah. Help me out?
405 was attacking Trust Fund, 426 was agreeing that SK was looking scum as well (I don't see that as an either/or situation), 458 was a miscue from hydra dissonance.In post 677, borkjerfkin wrote:upon skimming Jon Doe's 405 is a weird hard pounce on SK despite having no interaction with them prior, and 426 ("I'm sure SK is scum") is out of sync with 458 (vote for SK) but I have no idea which head is doing what there
I actually think them just going AWOL probably means they're townIn post 688, Sugar Cain wrote:I had mollie as a goodish town-read earlier, but both her and DGB's recent actions are making me unsure of that read
Cuz there's no scum motivation either? You might be on to something with coaxing someone to claim their flavor though.... hmmm.In post 683, Jon Doe wrote:Looking at motivation here. I see no town motivation. I see exactly what he alluded to ~ gambit. It works to give him town cred while at the same time looking for (and finding?) a PR for NK. Claim yourself is fine, stupid IMO, but fine. Coaxing someone who could easily not be vanilla to do the same...nah. Why isn't this a hot topic?
Toogs claimed Maggie, I claimed Glenn. Just flavor, though.In post 694, chesskid3 wrote:Did I miss anything like claims or whatnot
plz look at that fery/nacho thingIn post 663, borkjerfkin wrote:I love how individual people have over 107 posts, that makes me want to really catch up
Who am I looking at? StupendousKey? who else?