Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:54 pm
That I'm willing to hammer myself if it comes to it. I sincerely don't care who we lynch at this point as long as we lynch someone. I'm playing dota at the moment, so in-and-out.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
we talked pre game.In post 671, Bert wrote:@Mantis: Not really
Wisdom hasn't commented much, if at all , about you recently. Plus he may have talked to u before d1?
Sorry phone access only for the rest of the night :/
"i think you are scum, but maybe not"In post 673, serrapaladin wrote:So my thinking cap is on, and I'll go through this bit by bit.
This would be such an arbitrary thing for scum to come up with. Either there's some silly stuff going on and Nati has information he's trying to abuse, or this is genuine and he's town. I'm very much leaning the latter. Not lynching him today.In post 602, Natirasha wrote:God dammit. Time for some bravado.
VOTE: Serrapaladin
: Please don't consider this vote against you via case. I think you are town and this lynch is being driven by scum. However, I refuse to allow a No Lynch to happen here. Rest assured, I will not let your death be in vain.Serra
: I think you are the most townie of those in this game. I think you and I are on a similar wavelength at the moment, please don't betray my trust here.Bert
The Town: I have an idea, but it will only work if I can set it up in private with a player. I know this is a leap of both trust and speculation, but if there is a neighborizer, please speak to me tonight.
: I'm Om to you.The Scum
For the first time this game, I have a clear plan of action on how to proceed. Despite getting very little done today, I think the town is in prime position for day two. Let's finalize this lynch and go, folks.
This still rings alarm bells, but other posts have me reconsidering.In post 612, Mantisdreamz wrote:Xpost gimme a chance to claim at least? Christ
...
In post 551, Wisdom wrote:Vote serra, people.
what is this anyway?In post 620, Natirasha wrote:Slimer, I know you're there. Town Points for voting mantis.
"guys im being voted for the wrong reasons, please dont lynch me"In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
Yes, you have posted a few really, really awful posts that. if coming from town make me want to leave an imprint of my forehead in my wall. Unfortunately, there are also posts of yours that sound genuine.In post 681, Mantisdreamz wrote:BECAUSE.. this:
"i think you are scum, but maybe not"In post 673, serrapaladin wrote:So my thinking cap is on, and I'll go through this bit by bit.
This would be such an arbitrary thing for scum to come up with. Either there's some silly stuff going on and Nati has information he's trying to abuse, or this is genuine and he's town. I'm very much leaning the latter. Not lynching him today.In post 602, Natirasha wrote:God dammit. Time for some bravado.
VOTE: Serrapaladin
: Please don't consider this vote against you via case. I think you are town and this lynch is being driven by scum. However, I refuse to allow a No Lynch to happen here. Rest assured, I will not let your death be in vain.Serra
: I think you are the most townie of those in this game. I think you and I are on a similar wavelength at the moment, please don't betray my trust here.Bert
The Town: I have an idea, but it will only work if I can set it up in private with a player. I know this is a leap of both trust and speculation, but if there is a neighborizer, please speak to me tonight.
: I'm Om to you.The Scum
For the first time this game, I have a clear plan of action on how to proceed. Despite getting very little done today, I think the town is in prime position for day two. Let's finalize this lynch and go, folks.
This still rings alarm bells, but other posts have me reconsidering.In post 612, Mantisdreamz wrote:Xpost gimme a chance to claim at least? Christ
...
(twice)
In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:Then:
630 actually reads genuine to me by tater. I'm willing to believe her, and I suppose that also makes me okay with her progression on me.
mollie still isn't.
Lynx is completely right about slimer, but that's something to address tomorrow.
The neighbour claim is annoying. I'd really want to leave that alone until we get more claims.
If Mala is doing this right, Castle is as likely to be a fakeclaim as anyone else.
As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
In post 688, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:Then:
630 actually reads genuine to me by tater. I'm willing to believe her, and I suppose that also makes me okay with her progression on me.
mollie still isn't.
Lynx is completely right about slimer, but that's something to address tomorrow.
The neighbour claim is annoying. I'd really want to leave that alone until we get more claims.
If Mala is doing this right, Castle is as likely to be a fakeclaim as anyone else.
As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
...ok.
am thinking of unvoting.
what do you mean by lynx is not right about slimer? do you have a town read on lynx? and what are your thought on slimer?
why is the neghbour claim annoying??
*back to thinking that you might be a good vote*
"Scum caught for the wrong reasons" is such a bad tell. It doesn't work. Not even close. Town is as likely to argue against false accusations as scum.In post 685, Wisdom wrote:"guys im being voted for the wrong reasons, please dont lynch me"In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
^scum
so.... who are you left off with wanting to lynch then?In post 687, serrapaladin wrote:Yes, you have posted a few really, really awful posts that. if coming from town make me want to leave an imprint of my forehead in my wall. Unfortunately, there are also posts of yours that sound genuine.In post 681, Mantisdreamz wrote:BECAUSE.. this:
"i think you are scum, but maybe not"In post 673, serrapaladin wrote:So my thinking cap is on, and I'll go through this bit by bit.
This would be such an arbitrary thing for scum to come up with. Either there's some silly stuff going on and Nati has information he's trying to abuse, or this is genuine and he's town. I'm very much leaning the latter. Not lynching him today.In post 602, Natirasha wrote:God dammit. Time for some bravado.
VOTE: Serrapaladin
: Please don't consider this vote against you via case. I think you are town and this lynch is being driven by scum. However, I refuse to allow a No Lynch to happen here. Rest assured, I will not let your death be in vain.Serra
: I think you are the most townie of those in this game. I think you and I are on a similar wavelength at the moment, please don't betray my trust here.Bert
The Town: I have an idea, but it will only work if I can set it up in private with a player. I know this is a leap of both trust and speculation, but if there is a neighborizer, please speak to me tonight.
: I'm Om to you.The Scum
For the first time this game, I have a clear plan of action on how to proceed. Despite getting very little done today, I think the town is in prime position for day two. Let's finalize this lynch and go, folks.
This still rings alarm bells, but other posts have me reconsidering.In post 612, Mantisdreamz wrote:Xpost gimme a chance to claim at least? Christ
...
(twice)
Are you kidding me? You are doing literally EXACTLY what you just voted me for doing.In post 689, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 688, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:Then:
630 actually reads genuine to me by tater. I'm willing to believe her, and I suppose that also makes me okay with her progression on me.
mollie still isn't.
Lynx is completely right about slimer, but that's something to address tomorrow.
The neighbour claim is annoying. I'd really want to leave that alone until we get more claims.
If Mala is doing this right, Castle is as likely to be a fakeclaim as anyone else.
As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
...ok.
am thinking of unvoting.
what do you mean by lynx is not right about slimer? do you have a town read on lynx? and what are your thought on slimer?
why is the neghbour claim annoying??
*back to thinking that you might be a good vote*
woo! ty!Fixed your booched quote tag. 'Cause I'm awesome ~Mala
i asked you questions. ANSWER THEM!!In post 692, serrapaladin wrote:Are you kidding me? You are doing literally EXACTLY what you just voted me for doing.In post 689, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 688, Mantisdreamz wrote:In post 682, serrapaladin wrote:Then:
630 actually reads genuine to me by tater. I'm willing to believe her, and I suppose that also makes me okay with her progression on me.
mollie still isn't.
Lynx is completely right about slimer, but that's something to address tomorrow.
The neighbour claim is annoying. I'd really want to leave that alone until we get more claims.
If Mala is doing this right, Castle is as likely to be a fakeclaim as anyone else.
As to why I'm being voted: slimer thinks I've been misrepping his meta to score an easy lynch, Wisdom thinks my annoyance at slimer is fake because I couldn't possibly be that annoyed at lurkers, and desp thinks???
...ok.
am thinking of unvoting.
what do you mean by lynx is not right about slimer? do you have a town read on lynx? and what are your thought on slimer?
why is the neghbour claim annoying??
*back to thinking that you might be a good vote*